That did it -- thanks.
On May 9, 10:41 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Greg Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How do I get a handle on the request object from within a custom
> > template tag?
>
> By making the request available to the
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Erwin Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 5, 1:47 pm, bobhaugen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Thanks. If I read that last one correctly, queryset-factor was merged
>> >
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Erwin Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 5, 1:47 pm, bobhaugen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks. If I read that last one correctly, queryset-factor was merged
> > into trunk on 4-26, andnewforms-adminmerged trunk on 4-28 (and
> > appears to do so
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Greg Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I get a handle on the request object from within a custom
> template tag?
By making the request available to the template as a context variable,
then accessing it the same as any other context variable.
--
I searched for solutions/examples with no luck, but this can't be that
hard.
How do I get a handle on the request object from within a custom
template tag?
Thanks --- Greg F
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Thanks to both. Got it working.
On May 9, 9:17 pm, Aaron Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Similarly, this will work also:field = 'sections' qry =
> qry.filter(**{field+'__name__exact': 'shooting'})Cheers,
> Aaron
> John Lenton wrote:On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Greg Fuller<[EMAIL
>
Hi all,
I keep getting lots errors related to caching when pages are crawled
by bots like GoogleBot, Yahoo slurp, and Co (see tracebacks and code
above).
It works perfectly well when browsed by real users and real browsers.
Has anyone had an issue with crawlers and caching, or would have some
Similarly, this will work also:
field = 'sections'
qry = qry.filter(**{field+'__name__exact': 'shooting'})
Cheers,
Aaron
John Lenton wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Greg Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build filter strings dynamically.
The
> Awesome! Thanks much, Eric!
My pleasure... Just noticed there's a typo in the second part, should
be columns.setdefault..., not blocks.
Hooray for native group_by support in the ORM! I didn't realize that
was already in there.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
pihentagy wrote:
Hi all!
I come to here from a little symfony background (a framework, which
try to borrow good things from django), and would like to have an
overview how django stacks up.
I would like to ask, if the admin module can be used on a production
server by registered users.
The
Hi all!
I come to here from a little symfony background (a framework, which
try to borrow good things from django), and would like to have an
overview how django stacks up.
I would like to ask, if the admin module can be used on a production
server by registered users.
What problems can occur?
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does django carry something similar to what I am looking for? If not,
> would a group_by feature be something worth adding to django?
If you're using a recent Django trunk checkout (after the
queryset-refactor merge), there is
Hi,
after moving server and upgrading the application this strange error
happens to me. Strange because it is inside Django - means nothing to
do with the app - and there wasn't changed anything with Django.
The only thing changed is that
'django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend', has been
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Greg Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build filter strings dynamically.
>
> The normal way works:
>qry = qry.filter(sections__name__exact='printing')
>
> This does not work:
>filter_str = "sections__name__exact='shooting'"
>
Hello,
I'm trying to build filter strings dynamically.
The normal way works:
qry = qry.filter(sections__name__exact='printing')
This does not work:
filter_str = "sections__name__exact='shooting'"
qry = qry.filter(filter_str)
.
The error is "too many values to unpack" at
On May 9, 4:57 pm, Eric Abrahamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Don't forget to reply to the list...)
Apologies... didn't realize I hit "Reply to author"
> The documentation for the groupby function is notoriously obscure, but
> it's actually simple to use. It generates pairs where the first
On May 8, 11:14 pm, meppum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys, I need some help. I realized today that one of my source
> files is corrupt. When I open it in NotePad++ all I get is "null"
> characters. I've tried everything. Even software recovery programs to
> see if I have a non-corrupt
On May 9, 1:30 pm, Dennis Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got an importing problem with my django projects. I'm trying to
> build some kind of a framework which basically consists of 4 bigger
> modules. So I thought this django modularity perfectly fits my needs.
> I
> This sounds like it might do what I need... Care to share a code
> example?
>
>
> Greg
(Don't forget to reply to the list...)
The documentation for the groupby function is notoriously obscure, but
it's actually simple to use. It generates pairs where the first item
is the common key for
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Tyler Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be interested in hearing if your remaining issues with the
> GeoDjango install get resolved.
Tyler,
I am still working with the folks there and they are working on some
rock solid instructions for the whole
If you have the ContentTypes app installed, you can do the following
to avoid circular imports (assume you need the model called "Author"):
# at top with other imports
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
#in function where model is needed
Is it ever. I don't know why I did not see that. Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Hi Marcin,
the syndb command doesn't change your tables it only creates them, so
any changes you make to the models after the first sync will have to
be created manually via pgadmin or whatever is your preferred tool.
Alternatively if you are still in development and don't need the data
VidJa Hunter escribió:
>
> paginator.is_on_page(object) would return page 6 if object is element 31 of
> the given queryset.
>
I am leaving right now, but, what about something like this?
for page in paginator.page_range:
if object in paginator.page(page).object_list:
In the meantime, you can use the groupby template tag for simple
grouping operations in the template, or else I've had success using
the itertools.groupby function in the view, and then passing your
queryset as a dictionary or list of tuples to the template. It will be
nice to have native
On May 9, 2008, at 21:17 , Marty Alchin wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Alex Morega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There seems to be a race condition in Django's model code for file
>> uploads. Here's the relevant code snippet (django/db/models/base.py
>> line 458 in the latest SVN
Their is a thread here regarding the GSOC student's work:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/f83457fc3cdb235d
On May 9, 1:41 pm, gmacgregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 9, 2:37 pm, gmacgregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Something like it is being
On May 9, 2:37 pm, gmacgregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something like it is being "considered" but nothing for
> sure:http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3566
Whoops, I lied: check out the (currently) last comment made by Russ M
on the ticket page:
"For the benefit of those that haven't
On May 9, 1:47 pm, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a group_by method when getting querysets?
Nope... nothing of the sort. You'll have to write raw SQL for that.
I'm struggling with the same thing right now.
> Check out the following example.
> ...
> events_by_group =
>
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 10:47 -0700, Chris Farley wrote:
> I'm trying to model our customers in a Django application, but I'm
> encountering a problem:
>
> Customers can have many CustAddresses
> One CustAddress is the Customer's primary billing address
> One CustAddress is the Customer's
http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2006/jun/06/django-tips-extending-user-model/
You can create a profile model that holds all the information you
need, then in your settings specify APP_PROFILE_MODULE which will
define a OneToOne relationship from the auth user to your profile
model. It will
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Alex Morega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be a race condition in Django's model code for file
> uploads. Here's the relevant code snippet (django/db/models/base.py
> line 458 in the latest SVN version - #7520):
>
> while
Hi,
There seems to be a race condition in Django's model code for file
uploads. Here's the relevant code snippet (django/db/models/base.py
line 458 in the latest SVN version - #7520):
while os.path.exists(os.path.join(settings.MEDIA_ROOT,
filename)):
try:
On 5/9/08, Richard Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not sure what the dom1.toxml() does, are you seeing:
>
>
>
>
>
> left="Necklace"/>
>
Yes, I am seeing this text. Darn. :(
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
I'm trying to model our customers in a Django application, but I'm
encountering a problem:
Customers can have many CustAddresses
One CustAddress is the Customer's primary billing address
One CustAddress is the Customer's primary shipping address
It's a classic 'chicken and egg' problem.
Is there a group_by method when getting querysets? Check out the
following example.
class SportsEvent(models.Model):
"""Sports"""
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
sport_type = models.ForeignKey(Sport)
event_date = models.DateTimeField()
class Sport(models.Modle):
Hi,
I'm with the Central PA Linux User Group (CPLUG) and a few of us are
organizing a small, open source conference to be held this fall in
Harrisburg, PA (USA).
It would be cool to have a Django presentation (or two), so I wanted
to extend an invite to those on the django-discuss list. If you
I am not sure what the dom1.toxml() does, are you seeing:
in firebug, to be sure that it is correctly returning the xml? If so
then the problem is most likely within the javascript and you may have
better luck at the googlemaps api group.
-richard
On 5/9/08, Monica Leko
Hello,
I've got an importing problem with my django projects. I'm trying to
build some kind of a framework which basically consists of 4 bigger
modules. So I thought this django modularity perfectly fits my needs.
I created 4 projects with different apps in them. Now some of the
models from one
Slight correction. In your first example:
class Chapter(models.Model):
>book = models.ForeignKey(Chapter)
>
The parameter to ForeignKey should be book:
class Chapter(models.Model):
book = models.ForeignKey(Book)
As mentioned earlier, you can locate a chapter's book as
On 5/9/08, Richard Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not sure what javascript library you are using based on the code
Google maps. GXmlHttp is just like XmlHttpRequest
Now I have this in my view:
return HttpResponse(dom1.toxml(), mimetype="text/xml")
And still my var xmlDoc =
Thanks for confirming.
Book.chapter_set.all()
gets all of the chapters for the book. Thanks!
mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The first way is the correct way, to get all the chapters for a given
> book you would do book_obj.chapter_set.all() , you can set what this
> attribute is named by
The manage.py sql app shows
CREATE TABLE "groups_groupdata" (
"id" serial NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
"group_id" integer NOT NULL REFERENCES "auth_group" ("id")
DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED,
"division_id" integer NOT NULL REFERENCES "groups_division" ("id")
DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED,
On May 9, 6:34 pm, Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El vie, 09-05-2008 a las 09:30 -0700, Marcin Gorczyński escribió:
>
> > Hello
>
> > I have a problem with syncing with my PostgresDB - I type manage.py
> > syncdb, but it doesn`t create all the columns like in this model:
> > It
Thanks Brian,
One more question, there is another way to write a custom validator
without override the field type?
Nuno
On May 9, 5:30 pm, Brian Rosner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 9, 4:31 am, Nuno Mariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm using newforms-admin and I've got a "duplicate
El vie, 09-05-2008 a las 09:30 -0700, Marcin Gorczyński escribió:
> Hello
>
> I have a problem with syncing with my PostgresDB - I type manage.py
> syncdb, but it doesn`t create all the columns like in this model:
> It creates only 3 columns - id, group_id, name
Did you add columns after
I submit this patch some time ago:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5062 (latter turn to
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5246)
However, after get invalidad and the decision to support it elsewhere,
I wonder which have the better support of the external sql backend to
help to improve
On May 9, 4:31 am, Nuno Mariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using newforms-admin and I've got a "duplicate key violates unique
> constraint" when I'm added new record(with the same value on field
> that already exists in the db) in admin interface.
> I've an "unique=True" in the field,
Hello
I have a problem with syncing with my PostgresDB - I type manage.py
syncdb, but it doesn`t create all the columns like in this model:
class GroupData(models.Model):
group = models.ForeignKey(Group)
division = models.ForeignKey(Division)
name
The first way is the correct way, to get all the chapters for a given
book you would do book_obj.chapter_set.all() , you can set what this
attribute is named by doing ForeignKey(Chapter,
related_name='this_thing').
On May 9, 11:08 am, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on an
I am working on an app to host some books online. I cant figure out the
best way to represent a one to many relationship.
Basically, a Book has multiple Chapters, but a Chapter can only be in
one book.
Looking at the docs, this seems to be the way to represent this:
--
class
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:50 PM, anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Further particulars can be downloaded from http://www.zoo.ox.ac.uk/jobs/
That's not true.
jh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY
Web developer
Grade 7: Salary range:£26,666 - £32,796
Three year post
A web developer is required to join the Malaria Atlas Project (MAP,
http://www.map.ox.ac.uk). The job will be to lead in the improvement
of the on-line presence and thus public engagement activities of
Hi,
I would like to see the context from a custom tag using the {% debug
%} tag, but it's not displaying.
I'm rendering a template with the following view code:
return render_to_response("index.html", {
"who": {'name': 'Greg', 'city':'Smallville'}
In the template, I have a
On 5/9/08, Kirk Strauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Scott SA wrote:
>
>> These are M2M relationship records handled transparently for you. In
>> reality, they are in a table in between your two 'Role' tables. If you
>> want to delete them, then you can select and delete
Randy, thanks for the follow-up, and you're on the right track, turns
out it's an encoding 'problem' by default in django. I just have to
change the encoding language and then ask it for a different code.
I got it working for what I need.
John
On May 8, 9:16 pm, Peter Rowell <[EMAIL
I am not sure what javascript library you are using based on the code
snippet, but you seem to be looking for a javascript object to be
returned that contains XML. What you are returning is simply the text
'hello world' as a plain vanilla http response. You need to return
the type of object
Thanks Matthias, your crystal ball worked just fine, getlist clocked it.
-Original Message-
From: django-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Kestenholz
Sent: 09 May 2008 15:36
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Multiplechoicefield 1 value
> Does your model have a FileField?
Thanks, Karen. Yes, my model has a FileField. The doc never says
explicitly that it the save will happen, which was the source of my
confusion. It appears that it does when you have a FileField (I dove
into the newforms code a bit and am partially convinced
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 15:26 +0100, Ben Eliott wrote:
> Hi, Can anyone please advise on why a multiplechoicefield might be
> returning only 1 value (the last value)? Or maybe i'm not accessing it
> correctly...?
> Many Thanks!
> Ben
How are you accessing the value? Are you using
Hi, Can anyone please advise on why a multiplechoicefield might be
returning only 1 value (the last value)? Or maybe i'm not accessing it
correctly...?
Many Thanks!
Ben
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
See
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/sessions/#clearing-the-session-table
-- Scott
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Matt Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got you Scott
>
> cron job it is
>
> I seem to remember Adrian putting a nippet up somewhere with the code
> in(laxz I
Hi
I am trying to use some simple AJAX call, and can't get right result.
I am using this Javascript function:
function filterMarkers(){
var request = GXmlHttp.create();
request.open('GET', '/lbs/' + "?q=placeholder, true);
request.onreadystatechange = function() {
I got you Scott
cron job it is
I seem to remember Adrian putting a nippet up somewhere with the code
in(laxz I know), anyone remember where it was?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users"
Ok. Sounds like you can probably get by with creating your own ancillary
GroupData model (for example) and associating it one-to-one with the Group
model. I've done this in the past with User, creating my own UserData model
to hold some additional attributes, and it worked well for me.
--
Well basicly I want the groups to have more data associeted with them
- like a image filename, extracting the numer of users, one-to-one
relations with a model in a news app and forum app, adding models like
category like this category->groups, group and category moderators.
Probarly I can get
Hi All.
This is my first post here – just want to say Hi – Will make other posts
soon.
Peace
Riter
Did you know that your Govt. can make 100% profits through Taxes in 6 hours?
– read the story yourself.. http://talefunnytail.blogspot.com/ after that
laugh, think, growl or just pay up, but
Hi Marcin. Can you give some more detail on what specific additional
functionality you need?
It is possible that you can augment the existing models by creating
your own ancillary "UserData" and "GroupData" models, each with a
OneToOneField that relates directly to the auth.models.User and
On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Scott SA wrote:
> These are M2M relationship records handled transparently for you. In
> reality, they are in a table in between your two 'Role' tables. If you
> want to delete them, then you can select and delete them programatically
> (i.e. from a button on your form)
I
Hello
I have a problem to tackle - in my site I want to have groups that
have assigned forums, news etc. The Django contrib.auth just aren`t
enough (also I need a more custom user model). Anyone can please tell
me a good way to come around those limits? I thought about coding my
own user, group
Hello all. I'm new to Django, and to web development, so feel free to point
me to the manual if you need to :)
I am having a small problem developing a web interface for an application
(100% written in Python) I built. At first, I tried to use Ruby on Rails, as
advised by a friend, but since I
Hi Matt. The reason folks don't prefer to do it within the
application code is because it introduces a delay into rendering pages
while the DELETE is executed -- even in cases where there is nothing
to delete. By running the DELETE in a cron job you improve the
performance of your page loads.
Thanks for getting back to me Arien
If that's what people are doing to sort it out then that's fine by me, I can
write a cron job to run a script and everyone is happy.
If anyone has a more elegant solution I'm all ears.
I suppose I could overwrite sections of the middleware so that whenever a
Just a bit more information about how we're using the contrib.sessions
The only mention of it I have in my site is in the settings file, we don't
do anything else with it
MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES = (
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
)
Django source version is
Schedule: normal
On May 5, 1:47 pm, bobhaugen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. If I read that last one correctly, queryset-factor was merged
> into trunk on 4-26, andnewforms-adminmerged trunk on 4-28 (and
> appears to do so regularly), so the answer to my question is "yes".
That's the way I read it as
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Matt Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best method of keeping the django_sessions table from growing so
> large?
Well, there's django/bin/daily_cleanup.py ;-)
Arien
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hello everyone
I know one of the uber genii who use this list will have a very easy
solution to this one.
What's the best method of keeping the django_sessions table from growing so
large?
I've just ran a delete from django_sessions where expire_date <= $yesterday
to clear it out a little,
I have a db.models.Field subclass that needs a special representation in
the database. This is achieved by implementing get_db_prep_save() and
using SubfieldBase as the metaclass, and works fine.
The problem comes when serializing, the custom field is serialized using
the python's form string
This is my 'problem',
I have a paginator object created like this: (example with 40 objects, but
in practice we are talking about several hundred objects)
paginator = Paginator(queryset,5)
paginator.page_range
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Some objects on page 1 link to objects on page 6. When a
Look at the thing I posted. The sessionid= tag is there but it seems
to confuse django when there's more than just that in that header. I
don't know exactly what causes it though.
On May 7, 4:28 pm, finnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't it just a matter of session id cookie name? You
I'm using newforms-admin and I've got a "duplicate key violates unique
constraint" when I'm added new record(with the same value on field
that already exists in the db) in admin interface.
I've an "unique=True" in the field, shouldn't admin interface shows a
error message in the form and not
I don't think this matters here, but you're overriding the 'file'
builtin.
On May 8, 7:03 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Beals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Correction: request.FILES does exist -- it just wasn't getting printed
> > out with
Hi Julien,
that looks interesting, last time I looked at the django email it was
very basic and I needed to send HTML email with attachments, so that
snippet seemed the best way. By the looks you can now do that via
django as well!
thanks again.
On May 7, 10:48 pm, Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Whether you use Apache worker MPM or not, when using mod_wsgi you can
> > also use it in daemon mode. This is similar to fastcgi in the sense
> > that your web application is run in separate process(es), but mod_wsgi
> > will handle all the management of those processes, starting them up
> >
On May 9, 4:09 pm, Pigletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you mean compared to Apache prefork and mod_python then answer is
> > yes.
>
> Yes
>
> > Even without using mod_wsgi though, one can do better than prefork
> > with mod_python by using Apache worker MPM instead. Because Apache
> >
What I don't like about this is that I have to make an object based
database look like a SQL-database which is then made to look like a
object based database.
Makes my head spinn :-)
So, can't I attack this problem at another level where it's all about
objects.
-- Roland
Ben Ford wrote:
>
> If you mean compared to Apache prefork and mod_python then answer is
> yes.
Yes
> Even without using mod_wsgi though, one can do better than prefork
> with mod_python by using Apache worker MPM instead. Because Apache
> worker MPM processes are multithreaded you don't need as many to be
>
87 matches
Mail list logo
