The 192.168.1.1 is probably coming from DHCP? If so, configure your DHCP server
to advertise the preferred DNS server. You could also configure your firewall
to redirect all DNS requests to the preferred DNS server. Just make sure you
don’t block dnsmasq in the process.
--David
From: Chris
Hi team,
I was building the prpl3.1 version for the rpi4. When I flashed the image
observed that dnsmasq was not running by default. I did the manual running of
the dnsmasq(/usr/sbin/dnsmasq -k &). Can I get the more info about this? Is
their any way to run the dnsmasq by default ,
Hi team,
I was building the prpl3.1 version for the rpi4. When I flashed the image
observed that dnsmasq was not running by default. I did the manual running of
the dnsmasq(/usr/sbin/dnsmasq -k &). Can I get the more info about this? Is
their any way to run the dnsmasq by default ,
チュimoc wrote:
> `dig foo.bar @127.0.0.1 -p 53`, 0ms instant return which upstream is at
> least 10ms away.
> But dig upstream the result is correct. Restarted dnsmasq it'll work for a
> while then error again. I'm on the latest git. Running a debug screen for
> now and w
`dig foo.bar @127.0.0.1 -p 53`, 0ms instant return which upstream is at
least 10ms away.
But dig upstream the result is correct. Restarted dnsmasq it'll work for a
while then error again. I'm on the latest git. Running a debug screen for
now and want to get more inf
Hi Buck,
> Hi Lucas,
>
> your answers are not exactly providing too many extra details, so I try
> to generalise a bit.
>
Apologies, and thank you.
>
> On 15.10.24 16:24, Roger Lucas wrote:
> > For me, the question isn't whether DNSMASQ should be configure
Hi Lucas,
your answers are not exactly providing too many extra details, so I try
to generalise a bit.
On 15.10.24 16:24, Roger Lucas wrote:
For me, the question isn't whether DNSMASQ should be configured to be
authoritative or not. I'm comfortable with the fact that Windows will
Hi Buck,
Thanks for your reply. Comments inline.
>
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss on
> behalf of Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
>
> Sent: 15 October 2024 14:08
> To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> Cc: Buck Horn
> Su
On 10.10.24 12:13, Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
We have corporate Windows domain servers which delegate
"labs.internal.company.com" to a DNSMASQ
instance running on the lab gateway.
This DNSMASQ instance has to run in authoritative mode otherwise we have
problems with W
Hi Geert,
Thanks for coming back to me on this.
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss on
> behalf of Geert Stappers
> Sent: 14 October 2024 16:26
> To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after
Hi All,
Firstly, thanks for DNSMASQ. I've used it for longer than I can remember, and
it works incredibly well.
I have a problem with part of our lab networking, which is using DNSMASQ. The
problem is as follows.
We have corporate Windows domain servers which del
Hi Erik,
the decision of the Pi-hole team to apply your patch without the usual
waiting for patches to go into dnsmasq main trunk first is one way to
show that we were (and still are) absolutely convinced about the patch
and consider the likeliness of having to revert it at any point very
From: Rahul Thakur
The handling of truncated reponse is broken in 2.90. The answers
are removed before forwarding in case TC bit is set, which
seems incorrect as per rfc 5625.
A combined reading of section 4.4.1 of rfc 5625 section 6.1.3.2
of rfc 1123 suggests when dnsmasq explicitly deletes the
From: Rahul Thakur
the handling of truncated reponse is broken in 2.90. The answers
are removed before forwarding in case TC bit is set, which
seems incorrect as per rfc 5625.
A combined reading of section 4.4.1 of rfc 5625 section 6.1.3.2
of rfc 1123 suggests when dnsmasq explicitly deletes
forums to cause a huge amount of queries due to exactly this truncation
method we are talking about here (when dnsmasq is used with DNSSEC, the
query A time.nist.gov results in truncation).
Said Tapo camera is not behaving nicely and does not retry over TCP.
Instead, it retries the same query
Hi,
i found the some threads discussing this already (in 2023 and decades before
that), including:
-
https://www.mail-archive.com/dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk/msg17151.html
Disclaimer: i won’t get into the philosophical stance reg. uselessness or
“overblown”-ness of systemd, as
r->nscount = htons(0);
- header->arcount = htons(0);
}
if (!(header->hb3 & HB3_TC) && (!bogusanswer || (header->hb4 & HB4_CD)))
--
2.25.1
___________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelley
Hi Simon,
So what do you think of my reasoning for this patch? Do you agree?
Best regards,
Rahul Thakur
From: Rahul Thakur
Sent: 25 September 2024 15:29
To: Simon Kelley ;
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1
Hi All,
I have a problem resolving a specific DNS record, and I wonder if
anyone can give me a pointer to what is going on here?
I have a gentoo linux server, running dnsmasq -- configured as a dhcp
and dns server. DNSSEC is turned on. Most of the time it appears to
work fine without any problem
& (!bogusanswer || (header->hb4 & HB4_CD)))
{
--
2.25.1
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
en "NODATA-IPv6 / NOERROR /
NXDOMAIN" with "ANSWER: 0", versus " record found" with "ANSWER:
1", versus " record not found, REFUSED".
Cheers,
-Casey
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 10:24 AM Sven Geuer wrote:
>
> Hi Casey,
>
> On Fri, 20
queries by dnsmasq.
yeah
As you might have seen in my answer to Petr Menšík, I found my bummer. I
had a server= pointing to resolve my own domain on my local firewall. I
overlooked it due to being in a file below /etc/dnsmasq.d/
I had totally forgotten about that, so when I stopped the DNS on
Hello,
We've run into a regression between 2.89 and 2.90 that was introduced
in
https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=f5ef0f064c3f06b250a9eeda36dc239227658b00
which resolved the possible SIGSEGV reported in
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2
This answer came just in time, as I have just returned from holiday and
was starting to consider if I should try out another dhcp-dns solution.
On 30.08.2024 Petr Menšík wrote:
Make sure (sub)domains served exclusively by dnsmasq are marked as
local=/tier1.internal/.
Thanks for pointing out
FWIW, the Pi-hole project embeds dnsmasq without any special docker alterations
and is known to work fine in docker without restarting for months or even years
non-stop without such issues.
Also worth considering are issues with docker-proxy - maybe the interface goes
down temporarily and the
but generally we don't get our knickers in a twist over it.
Cheers,
GaryB-)
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Corey Minyard wrote on 2024-08-19 12:38pm:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 1:56 PM Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
On 19.08.24 18:38, Corey Minyard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 8:58 AM Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
It's not entirely clear from your description, but if your
On 19.08.24 18:38, Corey Minyard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 8:58 AM Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
It's not entirely clear from your description, but if your goal
would be
to have dnsmasq forward DNS requests to a DoT server, then dnsmasq
can't
do that
. I work around this by
> forwarding the given domains to another running dnsmasq with filter-
> set, but having that built-in would be really nice.
Very much agreed. And I'd suggest it should be an option for the whole set of
"filter-*" options. I have to filter HT
On 19.08.24 06:25, Corey Minyard wrote:
> I have dnsmasq mostly working, but I'm having one big problem. It seems
> that requests received from UDP are only forwarded to UDP, they cannot
> be forwarded to TCP. I'm running DNS over TLS on the server, so I have
> to
On 17.08.24 22:24, Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
I also own the public "foo.net" domain.
(...)
BUT, if I try the same thing with the foo.net domain, I get the CNAME
record back, but it never resolves to an A record so the lookup fails:
address=/root.foo.net/192.168.0
ll -Q bar.foo.net
root.foo.net.
$ drill -Q root.foo.net
192.168.0.234
I intentionally override a bunch of my foo.net subdomains with 192.168.0.0/24
addresses internally and this is one of them. I've even tried telling dnsmasq
it is authoritative for foo.net (using
auth-server,host-record,auth-
ate?
Dan
-- Original Message --
From "Geert Stappers"
To dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Date 8/17/2024 11:05:25 AM
Subject [Dnsmasq-discuss] patches
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:25:04AM +0200, Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
Hey Simon,
another patch ..
GaryB-)
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
d))
{
- m->netid->next = state->tags;
- state->tags = m->netid;
+ state->tags = dhcp_netid_create(m->netid->net,
state->tags);
}
if (save != 0)
--
2.33.0
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Hi. I am new to dnsmasq and do not really care about IPv6 as our ISP
does not support it. I am trying to replace the build in dhcp/dns in
pfSense with a dnsmasq on a separate machine. Currently there is 3 Linux
host on this vlan, on with dnsmasq.
I have setup everything as I think it should
ks in advance.
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
This issue is caused by dnsmasq incorrectly handling the client's tag
information. It is not related to adding the opts item.
This is a necessary issue, and the steps to reproduce it are as follows:
1. Run dnsmasq with --dhcp-hostsfile
# dnsmasq --dhcp-hostsfile=/var/run/test_dhcp
This issue is caused by dnsmasq incorrectly handling the client's tag
information. It is not related to adding the opts item.
This is a necessary issue, and the steps to reproduce it are as follows:
1. Run dnsmasq with --dhcp-hostsfile
# dnsmasq --dhcp-hostsfile=/var/run/test_dhcp
> Hi Yeoh,
>
> On 28.07.24 23:42, Yeoh via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>> Does 'option:42' or 'option:ntp-server' support using IPv6 addresses or a
>> domain name ?
>>
>> I mean instead of using an IP literal address we can instead specify a
>
On Monday, July 29th, 2024 at 21:08, Salatiel Filho
wrote:
> Would it be possible to make that log for dhcpdiscover ignored macs be in
> that "logged only once" mode that shows up for some dnsmasq events?
I had a similar problem with my Lutron bridge spamming with DHCPv6
Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately, this patch doesn't solve my issue.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Hi Yeoh,
On 28.07.24 23:42, Yeoh via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Does 'option:42' or 'option:ntp-server' support using IPv6 addresses or a
domain name ?
I mean instead of using an IP literal address we can instead specify a domain
name that resolves to multiple IP'
Hi,
Does 'option:42' or 'option:ntp-server' support using IPv6 addresses or a
domain name ?
I mean instead of using an IP literal address we can instead specify a domain
name that resolves to multiple IP's (IPv4/IPv6).
- Yeoh
______
Hi,
have you tried whether the most recent master commit PLUS the patch
submitted by Erik Karlsson on April 29 fixes the issue as well?
See
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q2/017561.html
Concerning your observation about not crashing after adding a print
Hi,
I have a problem with a Segmentation fault. The log is as follows:
024-07-24T17:06:00.540592+08:00 info kernel[-][25317.980044] dnsmasq[597243]:
segfault at 9 ip 15257897bObe sp 7fffba533380 error 4 in libc.so.6
15257890c000+1710001
This Segmentation fault is triggered when dnsmasq
ol_u;
+ } control_u = { 0 };
iov[0].iov_base = packet;
iov[0].iov_len = len;
--
2.34.1
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
cla-07 */
{ 32768, "TA" }, /* DNSSEC Trust Authorities [Sam_Weiler][http://cameo.library.cmu.edu/][ Deploying DNSSEC Without a Signed Root. Technical Report 1999-19, Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, April 2004.] 2005-12-13*/
{ 32769, "DLV" }, /*
Hi Tim,
On 10.07.24 21:55, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
However, I however would like to run a second instance of dnsmasq
binding only to a tap0, for a virtual network (vde2) for some qemu
virtual machines, and I can't seem to get that to work, as it always
complains about 127.0.0.1 al
BE:EF:00:11 -j DROP
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Sunday, July 7th, 2024 at 22:38, Alasdair Muckart via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
>
>
> What are you running dnsmasq on?
>
> This is probably best dealt with at the OS firewall level rather than in
> dnsmasq.
This is on a router running asuswrt-merlin, so it's iptables
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
What are you running dnsmasq on?
This is probably best dealt with at the OS firewall level rather than in
dnsmasq.
Exactly how you do that depends on the underlying OS and the firewall it's
running but if you know the MAC of the Lutron devi
I have a Lutron RA2 Select repeater on my network using DHCP configuration (for
IPv4, IPv6 is SLAAC) and it mostly works fine. Unfortunately, it's spamming
dnsmasq with DHCPv6 information-requests once every second (in gross violation
of the spec which states a lower limit of 600 second
On 07/07/2024 05:40, CHOPPERGIRL via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Most of us are replying via the mailing list,
and apparently the mailing list isn't very smart,
and doesn't post our replies in the correct area
if our mailing software doesn't "quote" them
correctly. I&#
o I found the response to my simple dnsmasqquestion quite arrogant and
hostile, and soI dumped dnsmasq and used a Windows dnsserver solution instead.
Sorry, Linux community.
All I wanted to know was how to tell dnsmasqon the command line, how to pass it
an argumentto use a DNS server ip address, instead o
ample.com,10.1.2.3
host-record=bar,bar.example.com,10.1.2.4
Above 'domain-needed' would prevent that non-dot queries (e.g. for foo)
would be forwarded upstream.
Kind regards,
Buck
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@l
My DD-WRT file system is mounted read only (squisFS and/or RAMfs),so I can not
modify resolv.conf, dnsmasq.conf, or smartdns.conf
However, from the DD-WRT gui interface I can pass dnsmasqcommand line arguments
on startup via an edit text filed box.
--> How do I add name servers for dnsm
On 27.06.24 22:13, Dimitry Andric wrote:
In particular, this happens when dnsmasq serves a --local domain, and
'fixed' hosts are defined with --address entries having _only_ an IPv4
address.
For example, if dnsmasq.conf contains:
no-daemon
log-queries
domain=example.com
ing DNSSEC Without a Signed Root. Technical Report 1999-19, Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, April 2004.] 2005-12-13*/
{ 32769, "DLV" }, /* DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (OBSOLETE) [RFC8749][RFC4431] */
};
--
2.34.1
____
Hey Simon,
the attached patch fixes a double free() corruption leading to a crash
during startup of dnsmasq. The crash can be reproduced by using a
rev-server addresses with a prefix length != {8,16,24,32}, e.g.
rev-server=192.168.0.0/25,home.mydomain.com
The crash is caused by freeing too
case of some variable-length options the length field
is a constant but must still be specified.
just seemed strange to me, to give a length AND a null terminated
string in the dhcp options field.
Thx for your clarification
Greetz Matze
___
Dnsmasq
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Am Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:46:40 +0200
schrieb Matthias Lay :
> dhcp-option=tag:2,option:66,"fake2quoted"
sorry. typo
dhcp-option=66,"fake2quoted"
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://
00 at the end of the string and in the length of the
option. Looks suspicious to me.
Dnsmasq version 2.90 Copyright (c) 2000-2024 Simon Kelley
Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-UBus no-i18n no-IDN
DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset no-nftset auth no-cryptohash
no-DNSSEC loop-det
bridge filter rules to restrict the DHCP traffic, but at least
these are well-documented and narrow in scope.
I’m concerned about overhead. I’d like to simplify. What I’m really looking
for is some way to pass a ‘hint’ (aka tag) to dnsmasq for DHCP pool
selection. dnsmasq cannot distinguish a
On 04.06.24 11:10, Chris Green wrote:
Should I just manually edit /etc/resolv.conf or is there some better
way of handling this?
Your question seems not specific to dnsmasq, as dnsmasq is just a
potential consumer of resolv.conf.
You'd usually find a comment in that file hinting a
I am using dnsmasq 2.90 for captive portal besides other use cases and
I've noticed that when I put into dnsmasq cfg file e.g.
`interface-name=captive.apple.com,switch0.1` (this interface contains
ipv6 LL address and `100.104.103.1/28`) I will be getting this on the
client device (dnsma
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 06:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
> I've followed that URL and had to click deeper.
> Now sharing the output of
> $ curl --silent
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/whitepj/dnsmasq-lua/main/dhcp.lua
Thanks Geert.
Apologies -- it was my intention to keep the
If the DHCP server is running inside a container or behind a load
balancer, the DHCPREQUEST arriving at dnsmasq for processing may have a
Server ID (option 54) configured with an IP address that is not assigned
to the local interface. In this case, dnsmasq will check if the 'Server
Ident
);
lease_update_file(now);
+ lease_update_dns(0);
}
#ifdef HAVE_DHCP6
else if (daemon->doing_ra)
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsm
Hello,
I worked on a solution to add support for long options into dnsmasq and
want to share what I have come up with. I tested it successfully with
busybox udhcpc.
Looking forward to get feedback on this proposal.
best regards,
--peter;
Peter Kaestle (1):
dhcp protocol: adding long options
PTION_SIZE : len;
+
+if ((p = free_space(mess, end, opt, l)))
+ memcpy(p, string, l);
+else
+ break;
+ }
}
/* return length, note this only does the data part */
--
2.45.0
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@li
accessing the stored variables. Therefore, this is probably more of
a query about lua than it is about dnsmasq.
The man page states that the environment inherits a number of
variables (example: DNSMASQ_TAGS) which I am trying to retrieve -- but
my current approach is returning nil (eg. tags =
hould
or are there more places where a lease_update_dns(0) is missing?
Alternatively, can there be dangling pointers left even
after lease_update_dns has been run?
Best regards,
Erik
Den mån 6 maj 2024 07:14Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
skrev:
Hey Simon,
we found a bug resulting
s
queried thereafter and use-stale-cache is enabled, dnsmasq accesses this
dangling pointer and returns random data - often a string containing a
few control characters, once dnsmasq even SEGFAULTed.
Related dnsmasq.log:
|May 5 19:00:00 dnsmasq[4395]: query[PTR] 141.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa
from 127.0.0.
..
I think I'm missing something simple..
Can someone offer some help?
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
ed by
restoring the previous behavior with --local, as per the manpage.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Subject: dnsmasq
Good day from Singapore,
I am wondering if dnsmasq can be installed and configured as a full-fledged
authoritative DNS Server?
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
On 10.04.24 23:51, Robert Sharp wrote:
I have set up dnsmasq to provide dhcpv6 addresses for my network using
a /64 prefix delegated to the LAN interface (enp3s0) using dhcpcd.
Everything works fine, so I am now trying to extend ipv6 to a vlan I
have set up for my wifi clients. Again, dhcpcd has
and the other what I understood - updating transient IPs
to a domain name. But, neither of those seem relevant to dnsmasq, so I
came to the conclusion the Fedora article was wrong.
Petr, thanks. I now see that the article perhaps is not wrong because I
guess the resolution services provided
esday, March 19th, 2024 at 5:09 AM, Nicolas Cavallari - nicolas.cavallari
at green-communications.fr wrote:
>
>
> On 16/03/2024 10:09, shamrock_sesame214--- via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am attempting to run dnsmasq DNS resolver in gVisor. gVisor
DNSMasq should automatically resolve names when it gets a DNS request for a
device it registered over DHCP. Make sure to set the base name in your DHCP
scopes. I believe it updates /etc/hosts too.
This can be combined with IPv6 DHCPv6, but not all devices use DHCPv6, such as
Android. Android
Hi Folks,
I've been following this little how to:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/administration/dnsmasq/
Which says:
'Fedora Server Edition recommends the lightweight dnsmasq program to
provide DHCP, DDNS and DNS caching service for a server and a small to
me
On 28.03.24 14:28, Chris Green wrote:
... and another system, also running dnsmasq version 2.90:-
chris@t470$ nmap 192.168.1.128 | grep 53
53/tcpopen domain
chris@t470
So why are they acting differently and, possibly more to the point,
how do I make dnsmasq listen only on
use instead:
server=/gitlab.com/8.8.8.8
So why is not the '#' translating into the default server 8.8.8.8?
Thanks,
Elias._______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailma
On 21.03.24 04:33, Tim Tassonis wrote:
What I wonder: Is there a way to find out what hostnames the dhcp
server has assigned to what ip addresses dynamically? I know that
dnsmasq registers them just fine, but is there a run-time access to
that information?
dnsmasq stores its currently active
Hi dnsmasq,
So I searched around and found some very old discussions about supporting DNS
Update in dnsmasq. It seems like the feeling was that since dnsmasq already
gathered it's own information base from DHCP, it wasn't necessary to add DNS
Update support for clients because we al
Dominik
It seems like this behavior can be achieved in dnsmasq via the syntax
local=/example.com/127.0.0.1
Great. Since we run this on routers (Tomato) the dsnamsq configuration
file size matters.
Bottom line: Could we have a shortcut char for REFUSED as well e.g.
local/example.com/
On 19.03.24 20:38, Grundik wrote:
But, if the record in --address is only specified as IPv4, then
requests are still forwarded further, and I found no way to make
dnsmasq to return NXDOMAIN instead (as it should do in first place,
according to my understanding of documentation).
Quoting
domain).
Original Message
On Mar 18, 2024, 4:06 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 18.03.24 14:21, Elias LA via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Thanks. I see. So
> the rule `server=/firebaseio.com/#` is sent to local > server 127.0.0.1 which
> then blocks it because
Re-sending previous email with HTML formatting disabled, my apologies.
Control and standard test cases for issue reproduction listed below:
A 'control' test case for the issue would be to launch dnsmasq in a typical
Docker container. The program should launch normally and begin p
Control and standard test cases for issue reproduction listed below:
A 'control' test case for the issue would be to launch dnsmasq in a typical
Docker container. The program should launch normally and begin parsing the
config, etc. The `docker run` statement should contain --priv
-- Original Message --
From "Brian Haley"
To "Geert Stappers" ;
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Date 3/18/2024 6:59:21 AM
Subject Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix potential memory leak
As an attempt to express that proposed patches get human attention
- fantomas
wrote:
> On 18.03.24 12:29, Elias LA via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am aware about the documentation which you quoted (and which I
> > quoted). But how do you explain that the domain `firebaseio.com` is being
> > blocked by set 1 and NOT by set 2?
`. But it is not happening, and the domain is being blocked!
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, 18 March 2024 at 11:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 18.03.24 09:41, Elias LA via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>
> > In mydnsmasq.conffile, I have either one of two s
Dear Dnsmasq team,
I have a question which I hope someone can kindly clarify:
In mydnsmasq.conffile, I have either one of two sets of rules:
# Set 1:
no-resolv
server=8.8.8.8
server=/firebaseio.com/#
address=/*.firebaseio.com/
# Set 2:
no-resolv
server=8.8.8.8
server=/firebaseio.com
Hello,
I am attempting to run dnsmasq DNS resolver in gVisor. gVisor is a hardened
userspace kernel compatible with Kubernetes and Docker containers. At the
moment, gVisor does not seem to support some routing features such as those
found in linux/rtnetlink.h, including multicast related
Can someone help me from this blocker?
Thanks & Regards,
Purushotham P
From: Purushotham P
Date: Friday, 23 February 2024 at 11:37 AM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Cc: Saumya Singh
Subject: config error is REFUSED (EDE: not ready) for dnsmasq version
Hi Team,
Whe
sorry test again
Have difficulties to get dnsmasq list mails throught spamfilter
On 29.02.2024 13.30, Knud via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Only test mail
As I having problems to receive mails from the list
Knud
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq
arned from your router. The favoured method
of a client would depend on a client's OS. Linux and MacOS could do
DHCPv6 or SLAAC early on, Windows first favoured DHCPv6, but supported
SLAAC since Win 10 or 8.1, and Android does and only ever did SLAAC
exclusively.
Are you running your dnsmasq o
1 - 100 of 823 matches
Mail list logo
