Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-06.txt

On 09/06/2018 03:14 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: All, On 2018-09-05 20:45, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title   :

[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

I updated this draft months ago, based on feedback from the previous WGLC, and it expired without comment. I’ve refreshed it, and would like to ask again for reviews (especially if anything has changed in the past year) and another WGLC.

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt

On 5/2/17, 3:16 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Vixie" <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > >Lee Howard wrote: >> >> On 3/16/17, 7:02 AM, "Philip Homburg" <pch-bf054d...@u-1.phicoh.com on >> behalf of pch

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt

On 3/16/17, 7:02 AM, "Philip Homburg" wrote: >>1. I do not think there is consensus that having PTRs is or is not a best >>practice, so emphasizing the lack of consensus lets us move on to what an >>ISP can do, if they care

[DNSOP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-08.txt

internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-08.txt has been successfully submitted by Lee Howard and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns Revision: 08 Title:Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers Document

[DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?

: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 10:05 PM To: Alain Durand alain.dur...@icann.org Cc: Lee Howard l...@asgard.org, dnsop@ietf.org dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Alain Durand alain.dur...@icann.org wrote: 3) There is another

Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?

From: Lee Howard l...@asgard.org Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:57 AM To: shu...@gmail.com, Alain Durand alain.dur...@icann.org Cc: dnsop@ietf.org dnsop@ietf.org Subject: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records? Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs

Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?

On 5/13/15, 11:12 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote: Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their customers? ISPs should delegate the relevant part of the IPv6 reverse DNS tree to the customer, so the customer can provision PTR

Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?

On 5/13/15, 11:05 AM, Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015, Lee Howard wrote: Is there consensus now that ISPs don¹t need to provide PTRs for their customers? No. As long as the anti-spam meassures include refusing email from IPv6 without PTR's, such a consensus would mean

[DNSOP] draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt

consensus. Thanks, Lee On 2/15/15, 11:56 AM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote: Per discussion, I have added the four use cases discussed at a previous meeting. The Recommendations section is now Considerations and Recommendations. The guidance from the WG was that ISPs should be advised of how PTRs

[DNSOP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt

for publication? Thanks, Lee On 2/15/15 11:46 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt has been successfully submitted by Lee Howard and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns Revision

Re: [DNSOP] Using PTRs for security validation is stupid

On 11/11/14 9:30 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote: Many SSH servers (by default) reject connections from IP addresses without PTRs. This is stupid. dun't matter if it is stupid or not. dun't really matter

[DNSOP] Using PTRs for security validation is stupid

Many SSH servers (by default) reject connections from IP addresses without PTRs. This is stupid. I heard applause during the WG meeting in response to these statements; sounded like consensus to me. I said I would check that consensus on list. Thanks, Lee

Re: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers

On 10/23/14 5:17 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message d06e91ee.72e46%...@asgard.org, Lee Howard writes: From: Mwendwa Kivuva kiv...@transworldafrica.com Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:23 AM To: dnsop dnsop@ietf.org Subject: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6

Re: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers

From: Mwendwa Kivuva kiv...@transworldafrica.com Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:23 AM To: dnsop dnsop@ietf.org Subject: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers Refering to the draft by Lee Howard https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-dnsop-ip6rdns-00

Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)

-Original Message- From: Tony Finch [mailto:fa...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:06 AM To: Ted Lemon Cc: Lee Howard; dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs) Ted Lemon ted.le

Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)

-Original Message- From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:46 AM To: Warren Kumari Cc: Lee Howard; dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs) On Nov 29

[DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)

Thanks for the lively discussion! Here's what I heard, in addition to several useful, non-controversial text suggestions: 1. Uses for reverse DNS a. Several people think it's unnecessary to require PTRs. A few even think a lack of PTRs might be a good thing (in the case of mail servers

Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)

-Original Message- From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:23 PM To: Lee Howard Cc: dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs) On Nov 28, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote

[DNSOP] new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs

You may remember this draft from a couple of years ago. People keep asking me what a residential ISP should do for IPv6 PTR records, and I keep repeating what's in the draft. The intent is to document existing solutions, since prepopulating PTRs like we did in IPv4 doesn't work. Last time I

[DNSOP] IPv6 rDNS for ISPs v3

I apologize for waiting until the last minute to make updates. Earlier versions of this draft have been discussed on-list and at the last two IETF meetings: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-03 Comments from the last meeting were as follows; I think I have responded to all of them in the new

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-01

Thank you, these are excellent suggestions. In particular, you raise several points that require clarification; I will try to respond in the near future. Lee -Original Message- From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JINMEI Tatuya / Sent:

Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00

-Original Message- From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:53 PM To: Doug Barton Cc: dnsop Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00 Windows already attempts to do

Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00

-Original Message- From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 2:18 PM To: Doug Barton Cc: dnsop; Shane Kerr Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00 Saying IPv6 reverse

Re: [DNSOP] Dynamically Generated PTR, was Re: ... rDNS for IPv6...

-Original Message- From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Edward Lewis Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:07 PM To: Lee Howard Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; 'Edward Lewis' Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Dynamically Generated PTR, was Re: ... rDNS for IPv6