On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:17:05 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:27 +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> > Info: us...@domain.tld/Trash: stop, expire time in future: Wed Feb 4
> > 21:00:50 2009
> >
> >
> > Why this message? I have 3 mailboxes, and the message appears only with
Hi Timo,
>> mail.info dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.15 starting up
>> mail.err dovecot: auth(default): Panic: Leaked file fd 5: dev 0.10
>> inode 3
> This happens only when Dovecot has been configured with --enable-devel-
> checks (or was it --with-debug in v1.0? I'm not sure anymore). The
> easiest
On Feb 6, 2009, at 12:48 AM, mathe...@gmx.net wrote:
mail.info dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.15 starting up
mail.err dovecot: auth(default): Panic: Leaked file fd 5: dev 0.10
inode 3
This happens only when Dovecot has been configured with --enable-devel-
checks (or was it --with-debug in v1.0? I'm
Hi Gents,
(apologizes, new here...)
I didn't find any hint on G**gle nor in the Dovecot archieve (maybe due to the
lack of a search function :), so:
I installed Doovecot, but can't get it going.
The logfile states:
> mail.info dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.15 starting up
> mail.err dovecot: auth(default)
On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
When I finally decide to convert to maildir, will I have to set up
namespaces
during the conversion, or will dovecot figure out where everything
is by itself?
Just adding namespaces won't really help with anything, except unless
you want to u
On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Alexander Beisig wrote:
mail_location = dbox:~/dbox
That's correct.
..
Ok thanks, so I downloaded the recent 1.1.11 release. But I still
don't know how to enable the dbox format. I think dovecot-
example.conf should explain how to enable it, unless you really
When I finally decide to convert to maildir, will I have to set up namespaces
during the conversion, or will dovecot figure out where everything is by itself?
Should I set up deliver to go to maildir/ globally, or per user?
I have considered using the convert plugin, if there are not a lot of neg
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 22:42 +0100, Alexander Beisig wrote:
> > I'd like to give the dbox format a try, but I could not find any
> > information on how to enable it. There's information on how to set
> > mail_location for the Maildir and mbox formats in the wiki and also in
>
Hi All,
I wanted to follow up my own message from September now that I've got
more information.
As of RHEL 5.3, GFS2 was finally advertised as "production ready" and
the servers discussed below have been upgraded from GFS to GFS2. The
difference is night and day. Essentially GFS2 has completel
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 22:42 +0100, Alexander Beisig wrote:
> I'd like to give the dbox format a try, but I could not find any
> information on how to enable it. There's information on how to set
> mail_location for the Maildir and mbox formats in the wiki and also in
> the commented configuration f
I'd like to give the dbox format a try, but I could not find any information on
how to enable it. There's information on how to set mail_location for the
Maildir and mbox formats in the wiki and also in the commented configuration
file, but how to set it for dbox is strangely missing. I took a g
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 13:08 -0800, Jack Stewart wrote:
Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue
question when using NFS storage?
Inotify is for Linux, kqueue is for BSDs. Right? So I'd think there are
a lot of other issues if you're switching bet
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 13:08 -0800, Jack Stewart wrote:
> Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue
> question when using NFS storage?
Inotify is for Linux, kqueue is for BSDs. Right? So I'd think there are
a lot of other issues if you're switching between Linux/BSDs..
s
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:59 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
> Timo Sirainen skrev:
> >
> > Hopefully this v1.1 release will last a few months.
>
> Builing on OpenBSD 4.4 (which has an ancient compiler, now I know), I
> got some warnings. There is one warning not related to this compiler's
> pointe
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yes but the issue was only this one time because I sent in one single row
> several days of emails on an account which exists for years and years (so
> unfortunately my friend has now many spams in several days, as well as many
> real e
Hi,
I've seen some chatter on NFS boards about kqueue being more reliable
than inotify when used in NFSv3 and NFSv2. The chatter is a bit old so I
don't know if it is true anymore.
Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue
question when using NFS storage?
I realize
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Um.. did you or did you not say:
>
> "In my case, most of these messages were forwarded to the gmail servers,
> and as there were many spams unfortunately in these emails forwarded
> (and it's not my server's purpose to remove the spams
Timo Sirainen skrev:
Hopefully this v1.1 release will last a few months.
Builing on OpenBSD 4.4 (which has an ancient compiler, now I know), I
got some warnings. There is one warning not related to this compiler's
pointer handling which is worth considering I think:
maildir-sync-index.c:29
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I won't forward spam to you, I already told you. This is just an email alias
> for a friend. It is just a email translation for a single external email
> which has been explicitely asked. My smtp server is not an open relay for
> any or
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> But if you relay any spam and get blacklisted for it, you will be the one
> that
> suffers. The blacklists don't care what your point of view is or if you
> generated the spam or just relayed it.
>
> Then everyone on your server will suffe
on 2-4-2009 12:09 PM Anthony Davis spake the following:
> Please remove me from the mailing list, i have tried a number of times
> to un-subscribe, but i still keep getting emails...
>
> Tony
>
> On 4 Feb 2009, at 19:35, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote:
>
>> dovecot@dovecot.org
>
>
What did
on 2-5-2009 6:47 AM Jehan Pagès spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you are
>> syaing you are operating an ISP service?
>>
>
> As for I, net neutrality is not about ISP only, but a
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 08:38 -0600, Ken A wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Is there a way to return a per user dirsize quota from a passdb sql
lookup? If so, what is the syntax?
Yes, but only if you use prefetch userdb. Do you? I
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 11:36 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
Question: Do you have to have a radically greater setting for maildir
than for mbox? I would think...
What sort of values are people using with both formats? Sounds like a
nasty thing that could bite one in the $%# co
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 08:38 -0600, Ken A wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a way to return a per user dirsize quota from a passdb sql
> >> lookup? If so, what is the syntax?
> >
> > Yes, but only if you use prefetch userdb. Do you
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 09:28 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> More questions about the first patch:
>
> Is it necessary to apply this patch in 1.1, if we are using
> "pop3_no_flag_updates = yes"?
Probably not.
> (And, is it compatible with
> pop3_no_flag_updates in 1.2?)
Yes.
sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luigi Rosa said the following on 03/02/09 11:24:
> I have a Linux CentOS server, 4 Gb RAM, with 50 IMAP users.
> The server is connected to LAN via a firewall appliance, no filtering applied.
>
> Many users with different clients complain a lot of "se
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 11:36 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> Question: Do you have to have a radically greater setting for maildir
> than for mbox? I would think...
> What sort of values are people using with both formats? Sounds like a
> nasty thing that could bite one in the $%# come migration fr
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11.tar.gz.sig
I've refreshed the ManageSieve patch for the new release:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11-managesieve-0.10.5.diff.gz
http://www.rename-it.nl/d
Question: Do you have to have a radically greater setting for maildir
than for mbox? I would think...
What sort of values are people using with both formats? Sounds like a
nasty thing that could bite one in the $%# come migration from mbox to
maildir
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Jack Stewart wrote:
Jack Stewart wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I have this message repeated several times each *seconds* in
/var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
the max_mail_processes is set to 8192 and I can see an average of 500
imap processes
on the machine , I think there is a problem somewhere ...
Debian 64
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 14:51 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
One problem which might be making this worse than it needs to be, is
the fact that mbox_lock_flock in mbox-lock.c is not using a blocking
flock(); instead, it's polling for a non-blocking lock. This technique
can cause
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I have this message repeated several times each *seconds* in
/var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
the max_mail_processes is set to 8192 and I can see an average of 500
imap processes
on the machine , I think there is a problem somewhere ...
Debian 64 bits , IBM X3650 bip
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you are
> syaing you are operating an ISP service?
>
As for I, net neutrality is not about ISP only, but also for service
providers (even if not professional like I, just for th
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Is there a way to return a per user dirsize quota from a passdb sql
lookup? If so, what is the syntax?
Yes, but only if you use prefetch userdb. Do you? If not, you'll need to
return it from userdb.
So, prefetch userdb i
Thanks.
More questions about the first patch:
Is it necessary to apply this patch in 1.1, if we are using
"pop3_no_flag_updates = yes"? (And, is it compatible with
pop3_no_flag_updates in 1.2?)
Updating messages as "seen" was confusing to users who accessed their
mail with both POP and IMAP, so
Hello List
I am running a Cyrus IMAP that needs to be replaced.
Geting a Dovecot IMAP up and running was surprisingly simple.
My configuration is close to Johnny Chaddas Howto at
http://johnny.chadda.se/2007/04/15/mail-server-howto-postfix-and-dovecot-with-mysql-and-tlsssl-postgrey-and-dspam/
I
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> That's unfortunate, but I cannot do what you say for these reasons. This is
> somehow a question of network neutrality (
> http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144 ).
Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you
On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.11.tar.gz.sig
Just FYI, ONLY SINCE UPGRADING TO 1.1.11 from 1.1.10, a 'killall
dovecot' yields this...
Feb 5 07:59:23 G520X2 dovecot: Killed
Hi,
I don't agree. If antispam systems were really 100% sure to never have any
false positive, I would agree (having false negative is less an issue). But
we all know that such system does not exist yet (and probably never will
IMHO, even though efficiency may increase to close to 100%, as it is s
Bernhard Herzog schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> On 15.01.2009, Sascha Wilde wrote:
>>> But should it just internally convert "owner" to "username" when
>>> replying?
>> From our experience this would be a very good idea. Many clients
>> recognize the username and handle those ACLs differently in there UI
Hi all,
On 15.01.2009, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> > But should it just internally convert "owner" to "username" when
> > replying?
>
> From our experience this would be a very good idea. Many clients
> recognize the username and handle those ACLs differently in there UI
> (for example they don't offer
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> and as there were many spams unfortunately in these emails forwarded
> (and it's not my server's purpose to remove the spams when
> forwarding), all requeued and sent in the following minutes, I saw in
> my logs that gmail has tempora
Hi,
I finally found my solution so I give it here if ever it interestes anyone.
I needed to use "postsuper -r ALL" in order to requeue the whole message
list and they were then using the new postfix configuration.
Note though that if you have a lot lot of spooled messages, the "ALL" is
maybe not
Hello
I have this message repeated several times each *seconds* in
/var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
the max_mail_processes is set to 8192 and I can see an average of 500 imap
processes
on the machine , I think there is a problem somewhere ...
Debian 64 bits , IBM X3650 biproc , 7 Gb RAM , RAID5
I was not able to reproduce the Outlook/OL Express users complaints (in
a test system). As it turned out, a DB problem in one of our ldap servers
led to dovecot authentication failures - showing in the logs that "shadow"
authentication failed. Deleting the "passdb shadow" (plus clean up of
tens o
46 matches
Mail list logo
