Thank you,
i looked up http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ACL section. We use POP3 , i think
it's diffucult to evaluate in POP3.
also we are using openLDAP backend, if i change folder permissions , does
it work ?
selçuk
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Il 20/09/2012 08:21, S
Il 19/09/2012 19:52, interfaSys sàrl ha scritto:
I see the same crashes on FreeBSD. Turning off ACL makes the crashes
disappear.
I'm getting a different backtrace though and it doesn't seem to be
related to ACL:
Core was generated by `imap-login'.
Thanks for your report.
My backtrace was ge
Il 20/09/2012 08:21, Selcuk Yazar ha scritto:
Hi,
can we prevent download messages from server user by user ? sme common used
mail's message must be remain at the server, but sometimes we download them
?
thanks in advance
If your users can log and read messages can obviously download it.
If
Am 20.09.2012 08:31, schrieb Selcuk Yazar:
> Hi,
>
> we have no problem, just i want to learn how can i do that. i think it's
> clear .
>
>
> selçuk
ok ,so the right answer is, unless you give more details
stop dovecot , nobody will able to connect to it
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:28 AM, R
Am 20.09.2012 08:21, schrieb Selcuk Yazar:
> Hi,
>
> can we prevent download messages from server user by user ? sme common used
> mail's message must be remain at the server, but sometimes we download them
> ?
>
> thanks in advance
>
please clear , what you mean with
1 : with download message
On 9/19/2012 6:19 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 19/09/12 23:41, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/11/2012 10:40 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>> You nailed it, Ben. Thanks!
>>>
>>> I downloaded/installed the dovecot-dev package from the same maintainer
>>> and was able to build Antispam without issue.
>>
On 19/09/12 23:41, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On 9/11/2012 10:40 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
>> You nailed it, Ben. Thanks!
>>
>> I downloaded/installed the dovecot-dev package from the same maintainer
>> and was able to build Antispam without issue.
>>
>> The hang-up now seems to be with my configurati
On 9/11/2012 10:40 AM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> You nailed it, Ben. Thanks!
>
> I downloaded/installed the dovecot-dev package from the same maintainer
> and was able to build Antispam without issue.
>
> The hang-up now seems to be with my configuration.
>
> I'm seeing the following error in my em
Hi,
> just a short question:
>
> I have installed and configured z-Push to use BackendIMAP. On my iPhone I
> have created an account and I can see my mails. Also sending works. So far so
> good. Now the question:
>
> When I create a new folder i.e. Test under the root (/), then I get an error.
Am 19.09.2012 19:43, schrieb Florian Zeitz:
> Am 11.09.2012 20:21, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> On 11.9.2012, at 21.07, Florian Zeitz wrote:
>>
I think we could simply #define the largest allowed context_size, use it
for these buffers' sizes and then add i_assert(meth->context_size <=
On 9/19/2012 6:22 PM, Juan C. Blanco wrote:
On 18/09/2012 20:49, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 9/18/2012 8:18 PM, Juan C. Blanco wrote:
It seems that the error is related to the ld.gold fix, If I revert the
c52a0c561311 patch the error is not produced
Oh d'oh. Yes, it related to that. I fixed it fo
I see the same crashes on FreeBSD. Turning off ACL makes the crashes
disappear.
I'm getting a different backtrace though and it doesn't seem to be
related to ACL:
Core was generated by `imap-login'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/dovecot/libdo
Am 11.09.2012 20:21, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 11.9.2012, at 21.07, Florian Zeitz wrote:
>
>>> I think we could simply #define the largest allowed context_size, use it
>>> for these buffers' sizes and then add i_assert(meth->context_size <=
>>> HMAC_MAX_CONTEXT_SIZE)
>>>
>> Well, either that,
On 09/19/2012 02:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> mUTF7 uses the & character for encoding non-ASCII data. The & character is
> encoded in mUTF7 as "&-". Dovecot nowadays uses UTF8 internally for all
> mailbox names, and it's simply not possible to create from UTF8 string a
> valid mUTF7 string that
On 19.9.2012, at 19.13, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
>>> This still looks some kind of a version mismatch. Did you compile antispam
>>> against v2.1.10 headers? /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 is also really
>>> from v2.1.10?
>>
>> Attached a helpful antispam patch.
>
> Erm... Am I missing somethi
On 18/09/2012 20:49, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 9/18/2012 8:18 PM, Juan C. Blanco wrote:
Hi Stephan, I'm traying to rebuild the RH (Centos) EL5 RPM with the
new pigeonhole version, however I've got the follwing errors when
compiling:
It seems that the error is related to the ld.gold fix, If I re
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:02:07 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 17:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.9.2012, at 17.55, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>> Did you recompile antispam plugin? Is it the latest antispam? This
line doesn't seem to match the current code.
>
> You are cor
On 19.9.2012, at 17.25, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 18.09.2012 20:52, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz
>> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz.sig
>>
>
> Hi Timo, i see a few rare errors with lucene and/or indexer
> since update
You are once again correct. The update script had an error and thus the
plugin was not recompiled for 2.1.10...
Thank you!
Olivier
On 19/09/2012 16:02, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 17:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 19.9.2012, at 17.55, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>>
Did you
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 17:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 19.9.2012, at 17.55, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>
> >> Did you recompile antispam plugin? Is it the latest antispam? This line
> >> doesn't seem to match the current code.
> >
> > You are correct, it had not been compiled in a while. Here
On 19.9.2012, at 17.55, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
>> Did you recompile antispam plugin? Is it the latest antispam? This line
>> doesn't seem to match the current code.
>
> You are correct, it had not been compiled in a while. Here is a new
> backtrace:
..
> #6 0x105e7a6a in buffer_write ()
> Did you recompile antispam plugin? Is it the latest antispam? This line
> doesn't seem to match the current code.
You are correct, it had not been compiled in a while. Here is a new
backtrace:
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x10709ebc in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
No symbol table info available.
#
Am 19.09.2012 16:25, schrieb Jost Krieger:
> On Wed 19 Sep 2012 04:03:45 PM GMT, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> as ever ,this is different in different places
>> specially Quarantine is wide used
>
> Of course, it's often useful.
>
>> there is no good or evil to this case, its a design question w
On Wed 19 Sep 2012 04:03:45 PM GMT, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> as ever ,this is different in different places
> specially Quarantine is wide used
Of course, it's often useful.
> there is no good or evil to this case, its a design question which may
> change in different places,, the abuse case m
Am 18.09.2012 20:52, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz.sig
>
Hi Timo, i see a few rare errors with lucene and/or indexer
since update
/lucene-indexes: IndexWriter() failed (#1): Lock obtain timed
Am 19.09.2012 14:53, schrieb Jost Krieger:
> On Tue 18 Sep 2012 07:47:09 PM GMT, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> some allready existing way is i.e
>> with milter and postfix tagged spam get in hold queue for i.e human
>> admin investigate, or some quarantaine with amavis
>
> Human admin is not a go
Il 19/09/2012 15:03, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first
message arrive "dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the
message is written to
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first message arrive
"dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the message is written to the
user's Mailbox but the message remains, als
(I forgot the attach)
El 19/09/12 11:15, Angel L. Mateo escribió:
El 18/09/12 18:31, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 18.9.2012, at 9.59, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
So I'm running this command. Whenever I run it, I get the
message that 3 (sometimes, is 4) entries are removed, but user
inform
On Tue 18 Sep 2012 07:47:09 PM GMT, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> some allready existing way is i.e
> with milter and postfix tagged spam get in hold queue for i.e human
> admin investigate, or some quarantaine with amavis
Human admin is not a good idea if you have 5 users :-)
Quarantine's a pos
On Tue 18 Sep 2012 07:17:50 PM GMT, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> On 18.9.2012, at 14.40, Jost Krieger wrote:
> ...
> > The idea is to not eat up the users storage with spam, so that spam
> > stays in the queue (for some time) while real mail gets delivered.
>
> Interesting idea. This was pretty easy
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first message
> arrive "dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the message is written to
> the user's Mailbox but the message remains, also, in the queue of qmail
> (deferral: Segme
On 19.9.2012, at 15.15, Cibest ML wrote:
> There's one quite strange thing we've seen. Display the subscription windows
> in Thunderbird and unchecking INBOX then shows two entries. "INBOX" that
> isn't selected" and "Inbox" that is selected and cannot been unselected.
> Checking "INBOX" again
On 19.9.2012, at 13.36, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-09-19 5:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> It's an invalid mailbox name and you can't access it using doveadm. Either
>> rename it with "mv" or via IMAP protocol (not entirely sure if it works via
>> IMAP either).
>
> Just for clarification.
On 12/09/2012 10:58, Cibest ML wrote:
On 11/09/2012 20:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 8.9.2012, at 18.07, Cibest ML wrote:
- Message delivered by LMTP
Quota name TypeValue Limit
User quota STORAGE 2653 524288
User quota MESSAGE 1 -
- quota recalc
Quota name TypeValue Limit
Us
Am 19.09.2012 10:00, schrieb cc "maco" young:
> for testing a new ssl cert. it works ok for browsers, but
>
>> openssl s_client -crlf -connect ms1.trailsandtribulations.net:443
>
> => verify error:num=19:self signed certificate in certificate chain
>
> is this ssl cert - as it's constructed -
Hi,
I have found this strange problem. I'm working with Debian 6, dovecot
2.1.9 and vpopmail-auth.
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first
message arrive "dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the message
is written to the user's Mailbox but the message remai
On 2012-09-19 5:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's an invalid mailbox name and you can't access it using doveadm.
Either rename it with "mv" or via IMAP protocol (not entirely sure if
it works via IMAP either).
Just for clarification... it is invalid because of the '&' character? Is
there a l
Am 19.09.2012 11:26, schrieb Christian Rößner:
> Hi,
>
> just a short question:
>
> I have installed and configured z-Push to use BackendIMAP. On my iPhone I
> have created an account and I can see my mails. Also sending works. So far so
> good. Now the question:
>
> When I create a new folder
Hi,
just a short question:
I have installed and configured z-Push to use BackendIMAP. On my iPhone I have
created an account and I can see my mails. Also sending works. So far so good.
Now the question:
When I create a new folder i.e. Test under the root (/), then I get an error.
And after re
El 18/09/12 18:31, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 18.9.2012, at 9.59, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
So I'm running this command. Whenever I run it, I get the message that
3 (sometimes, is 4) entries are removed, but user information isn't really
reloaded and I doubt it is really removed from cach
On 19.9.2012, at 11.22, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> One of my users has a mailbox named 'INBOX.Kron & SPM' (maybe created a
> long time ago, when we use courier imap as pop/imap server, but I'm not sure).
>
> I can see the maildir with a doveadm list command:
>
> amateo_adm@myotis31:~$
On 19/09/12 09:22, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
One of my users has a mailbox named 'INBOX.Kron & SPM' (maybe
created a long time ago, when we use courier imap as pop/imap server,
but I'm not sure).
I can see the maildir with a doveadm list command:
amateo_adm@myotis31:~$ sudo dovea
Hello,
One of my users has a mailbox named 'INBOX.Kron & SPM' (maybe created a
long time ago, when we use courier imap as pop/imap server, but I'm not
sure).
I can see the maildir with a doveadm list command:
amateo_adm@myotis31:~$ sudo doveadm mailbox list -u
...
INBOX.Kron & SPM
for testing a new ssl cert. it works ok for browsers, but
> openssl s_client -crlf -connect ms1.trailsandtribulations.net:443
=> verify error:num=19:self signed certificate in certificate chain
is this ssl cert - as it's constructed - is ok for mail clients? (realize
needs to be on mail port
Am 18.09.2012 20:52, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> + Added mailbox_alias plugin. It allows creating mailbox aliases using
> symlinks.
Hi Timo thx for coding, no Problems so far, after update, but
mailbox_alias plugin should be described at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/
--
Best Regards
MfG
46 matches
Mail list logo
