On 1/26/2024 3:02 PM, joe a wrote:
The "mailto:"; function does not seem to place a copy of the sent
message in the "Sent" folder.
...so a mailbox owner might have a ready means to track messages
potentially sent under their name.
The notify action has a specific purpose - it sends a notifi
can we change / set the allowed payload size for the
doveadm http api, so we can store bigger emails and attachments?
Can we store the desired allowed payload size in an env file somewhere or are
there any options to take control of the allowed payload size without changing
the source code?
Thanks in advance
Tony
g I will have to comment that out before running sysreport.
Tony
anted
security considerations moderate how liberal one can be, but pedantic parsing
rules that make no difference only reduce the utility of the software. In any
case the logging could be more helpful if it would include the objectionable
string.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot
I have a new install of dovecot 2.3.13, along with exim 4.94, in an Azure
hosted FreeBSD 12.2 VM. I have been running exim on local hardware with
FreeBSD for 15+ years, but dovecot and Azure are a new "learning
experience". I am getting an error response in dovecot.log when trying to
use the submis
Hi,
FWIW this was also reported back in August[1] - experienced with 2.3.2.1
(not sure if earlier 2.3 releases were affected) and currently
reproducible with latest 2.3.3 stable release.
[1] https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112548.html
Cheers,
Tony
On 2018-10-12 04:26
ync,
it's just not clear to me at which version of dovecot and pigeonhole
this began with the exception of mail files which are replicating.
Cheers,
Tony
ain.com" ]]; then
MSG="..."
elif [[ "$DOMAIN" = "domain.me" ]]; then
MSG="..."
elif [[ "$DOMAIN" = "domain.email" ]]; then
MSG="..."
fi
Thanks for any suggestions.
Cheers,
Tony
On 2018-01-07 00:08, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 1/6/2018 om 7:42 PM schreef Florian Pritz:
What is somewhat infuriating is that this behaviour change is not
mentioned in the release notes/upgrade notes and the commit that
introduces the change changes multiple things and it doesn't explain
why
th
On 2018-01-02 17:21, tony wrote:
On 2018-01-02 16:37, tony wrote:
On 2018-01-01 17:26, Peter wrote:
On 02/01/18 14:07, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I can see 21:21:38 is when the below errors showed up with the
above
21:21:38 timestamps:
Dec 29 21:21:38
lmtp(recipi...@domain.net)<17187>:
On 2018-01-02 16:37, tony wrote:
On 2018-01-01 17:26, Peter wrote:
On 02/01/18 14:07, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I can see 21:21:38 is when the below errors showed up with the above
21:21:38 timestamps:
Dec 29 21:21:38
lmtp(recipi...@domain.net)<17187>: Error:
program `/usr/sbin/sendmai
On 2018-01-01 17:26, Peter wrote:
On 02/01/18 14:07, Stephan Bosch wrote:
I can see 21:21:38 is when the below errors showed up with the above
21:21:38 timestamps:
Dec 29 21:21:38
lmtp(recipi...@domain.net)<17187>: Error:
program `/usr/sbin/sendmail' was forcibly terminated with signal 15
Dec 2
On 2017-12-29 21:47, tony wrote:
On 2017-12-29 18:35, tony wrote:
I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on
multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix.
The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled
Vacation/OOO response. The
On 2017-12-29 18:35, tony wrote:
I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on
multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix.
The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled
Vacation/OOO response. The Vacation/OOO reply filter was created
I did some more digging around and found this is reproducible on
multiple hosts running the same version of Dovecot/Pigeonhole/Postfix.
The problem resurfaces on any host to an account with enabled
Vacation/OOO response. The Vacation/OOO reply filter was created in
Roundcubemail, but has been f
1. how do I keep mails from being rejected and kept in the local
mailqueue instead? (which is the old system's behavior)?
* You can set a quota grace to basically have a soft-limit - allowing the user
to go slightly above their allocated quota.
2. what's the best (or simplest or recommended) way
It does look like a client issue. Do you also have some kind of AV
running? There are some AV software that can sometimes interfere with
mail sessions. See if you might be running into a similar situation:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1066126
Cheers,
--
TC
On 9/25/17 1:27 PM, Micha
dovecot to
dovecot.problem, then starting dovecot recreated /var/lib/dovecot. This
now results in no more errors. Everything is good again. Sorry for the
noise.
Cheers,
Tony
> /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-auth.conf by simply enabling
> "*auth_username_format = %Lu*"
On 8/26/17 3:58 AM, Tony wr
e -delete
find "$home" -type f -name dovecot.index.log -delete
find "$home" -type f -name dovecot.index.log.2 -delete
systemctl start dovecot
Clearing the index files made no different as the error continues ~5 min.
I can't wrap my head around this one and am not sure what
change will now warn that it most likely
won't work as intended.
Thank You,
Tony
On 8/25/17 2:39 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On August 25, 2017 at 9:11 AM Tony wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Today I started noticing a very odd Dovecot error in the
ormat = %Lu*" and of course restarted Dovecot. I
really doubt this has anything to do with what I am reporting as auth is
not the problem in this case.
Thank You,
Tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 9/12/2015 10:51 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tony Morehen [mailto:tmore...@ajmconsulting.ca]
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 17:57:27 -0400
Subject: Re: concerning dovecot settings for high volume server
You may be running up against Linux system
You may be running up against Linux system/user limits. Run
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
and
$ ulimit -a
That should give some insight into your problem.
On 12/09/2015 2:53 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
hi
centos 6 64 bit
hex core processor with hyperthreading ie display shows 12 cores
16 gb ram
600
Try turning off Apparmor. When I did the same OpenSuSE upgrade,
Apparmor messed up my dovecot installation with similar errors. I
disabled Apparmor and the permissions issues disappeared. BTW, I gave
up trying to re-configure Apparmor and have left it disabled with no
issues.
On 27/07/2015
Sorry, I have a dovecot.list.index.log file in Maildir, but no
dovecot.list.index. Obviously, my brain is faster than my typing.
On 12/06/2015 3:38 PM, Tony Morehen wrote:
I'm trying to enable Imap Notify in Dovecot 2.2.13. I know that's a
bit out of date, but that's what&
file
}
postmaster_address = Tony@localhost
protocols = imap lmtp
service auth {
unix_listener auth-master {
group = mailgrp
mode = 0660
user = mailuser
}
}
service lmtp {
executable = lmtp -L
inet_listener lmtp {
address = 127.0.0.1
port = 2525
}
user = mailuser
}
ssl =
particular for the 'post command' hook)?
Assuming it is a bug, I modified the code in the command_exec function to stop
the second hook call, a patch for this is below. This appears to apply to
later dovecot releases as well. I am happy for this code to be included in
future releases of do
Am 07.11.2012 16:23, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 30.10.2012, at 7.33, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote:
-m optionalfolder, without the dot. Also you may need to set
lda_mailbox_autocreate=yes if it doesn't already exist.
Thanks Timo, that was the solution of my problem.
usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda"
IMAP="$DELIVERMAIL -e -d $LOGNAME -m INBOX"
ZUSATZORDNER="$DELIVERMAIL -e -d $LOGNAME -m .optionalfolder"
...
dovecot-lda puts the mails for the optionalfolder always in the .cur
(INBOX).
What´s the correct dovecot-lda parameter to put the mails in the
optionalfolder?
Thank you!
Tony
: Permission denied (euid=500(tony)
egid=100(users) missing +w perm: /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb, dir owned by 0:0
mode=0755)
...
Dovecot is installed as !include auth-passwdfile.conf.ext. For all users there
is a entry in der /etc/dovecot/users.
Usaly the user rights are set to 600. I tryed 755
= example.test.com
ldap_version = 3
user_filter =
(&(sAMAccountName=)(memberOf=CN=LR3BCC-DL,OU=Autonomy,OU=Exchange,OU=Enterprise
Administration,DC=example,DC=test,DC=com))
Thanks
Tony
Bingo... It worked...
Thanks, Pascal
-tony
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of Pascal Volk
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 12:19 PM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Has dovecot 2.1.1 been built and tested on
fined HAVE_IPV6 ... or is there a
better way to move beyond this issue... (like a change to "configure")???
Thanks,
-tony
Here is the output of "dovecot -n":
# 2.1.1: /attic/usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: AIX 1 00C30F654C00
default_login_user = dovec
>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
>> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>
> Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
OK, thanks -- didn't think to look there. I see that it's a pretty long list.
I'll look for a workaround unless you thin
On Dec 11, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Tony Pyro put forth on 12/10/2010 4:29 PM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
>> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>>
>> .
Hello,
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
. search BODY "waldo"
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (0.000 secs).
. SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" FROM "waldo"
* SEARCH
. OK Search completed (1.768
ction I get only this for external IPv6:
"""
2010-11-02 02:51:38 imap-login: Info: Disconnected (no auth attempts):
rip=178.63.10.79, lip=188.40.178.56
2010-11-02 02:51:38 auth(default): Info: new auth connection: pid=28726
"""
I'm afraid that still leaves me stumped. Any further suggestions?
Thanks,
Tony
APPEND UNSELECT
IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE
QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS
QUOTA] Logged in
0 logout
* BYE Logging out
0 OK Logout completed.
Any insight would be appreciated, thanks!
Cheers,
Tony
~$ dovecot -n
#
On 10-04-04 19:59:43, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-04-04 14:07:49, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> > Am 04.04.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Tony Nelson:
> >
> > > I retrieve my mail from dovecot over POP3. Sometimes dovecot
> > > delivers a message into the spam mailbox, even thou
On 10-04-04 14:07:49, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Am 04.04.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Tony Nelson:
> I retrieve my mail from dovecot over POP3. Sometimes dovecot
> delivers a message into the spam mailbox, even though I have no
> spam filtering enabled.
Dovecot does not do that. Your MU
I retrieve my mail from dovecot over POP3. Sometimes dovecot delivers
a message into the spam mailbox, even though I have no spam filtering
enabled. I can't find anything in the wiki about "other" mailboxes and
POP3. I want to either never deliver mail in any mailbox other than my
default in
doveless. "It's less of a dovecot process." To me it
seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far.
I don't remember if 'dove-nil', 'dovenil' or 'dovenull' were suggested
by anyone. If not please consider them.
Kind regards,
Marco
Well...I'll throw my silly hat into the ring:
"doveman"
"dover"
Tony
On 3/26/2010 4:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.3.2010, at 10.47, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
How many dovecot-auth processes were there running? Unless there were 1024
dovecot-auth processes, it sounds
more like a file descriptor leak and adding more fds will only delay the error.
Ac
On 3/16/2010 7:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.3.2010, at 1.01, Mark Moseley wrote:
* Since Dovecot 2.0 seems like it's just around the corner, that's all
I've been testing, and indeed all I've even looked at.
Yes, hopefully it's coming soon :)
* Our #1 main motivation for lo
On 10-03-10 07:09:45, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2010-03-09 21:07:42 -0800, Terry Barnum wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05.03.2010 at 09:44:35 +, Ed W
> > > wrote:
> > >> I would be all in favour of a setting like this because it's
> > >> easier to configure than fail2ban...
> >
> > There's also denyh
On 10-03-04 23:43:25, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-03-04 20:22:15, Frank Cusack wrote:
> > On 3/4/10 6:42 PM -0500 Tony Nelson wrote:
> > > Looking at the source, I see that there are no options. It
> > > tarpits a bit, but currently has no limit on the number of
>
On 10-03-04 20:22:15, Frank Cusack wrote:
On 3/4/10 6:42 PM -0500 Tony Nelson wrote:
> Looking at the source, I see that there are no options. It tarpits
> a bit, but currently has no limit on the number of attempts. I'll
> see what I can do.
I think it's a brilliant ide
On 10-03-04 00:51:40, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:39:28PM -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
> > Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection.
> > I'd like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep
> > the ducks at ba
On 10-03-03 23:01:58, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Tony Nelson put forth on 3/3/2010 2:39 PM:
> > Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection.
> > I'd like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep
> > the ducks at bay, but I c
Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection. I'd
like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep the
ducks at bay, but I can't find anything in /etc/dovecot.conf or by
googling. How do I do it? Do I need to patch the source?
dovecot-1.1.10-1.x86_64 on CentO
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:33 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option?
Why?
Nothing to do with Dovecot...but we have other ancillary systems in play
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is P :). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)
Y
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option? If there's no
configuration option, would I override "allow_new_keywords" to just
return FALSE?
Thanks,
Tony
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file. The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specificatio
Tony Rutherford wrote:
For testing purposes, on a small set of users, we've run the
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl script. We are converting from Courier 0.43 to
Dovecot 1.2.9. For the most part, things seem to be ok. However, an iPhone
IMAP client user is reporting a problem where some o
e).
Regards,
Tony
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Tony Rutherford wrote:
We have our own delivery pushing messages to the /new and then /cur
folder
eventually. When I have an IMAP client attached, there is apparently
some
sort of race going on. I
ed by how well
Dovecot handles this situation and keeps its index files in synch while
other 3rd parties (web, etc.) are changing the Maildirs. It seems very
reliable, and we haven't seen any problems.
Tony
ound whether an IMAP client is attached or not (except for
handling the IMAP COPY/APPEND).
Regards,
Tony
Timo,
Wow..very strange on the linefeeds.
I implemented your suggestion with no problems easy enough. Thanks for chiming
in, I just didn't want to reinvent the wheel if it already existed.
Regards,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+tony=bluetie@doveco
#x27;m
not justifying the need for it, but I have to play the hand i'm dealtTony
RutherfordSoftware EngineerBlueTie inc.arutherf...@bluetie.com(585) 586-2000
x1040-Original Message-From: "Timo Sirainen" [...@iki.fi]date:
12/29/2009 04:02 PMTo: "Tony Rutherford&
ve looked around, and I'm guessing it exists, but I don't see it
offhand.Thanks,...Tony RutherfordSoftware EngineerBlueTie
inc.arutherf...@bluetie.com(585) 586-2000 x1040
This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipien
the functions you can
override.
Tony
-Original Message-----
From: dovecot-bounces+tony=bluetie@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+tony=bluetie@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Baule
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:37 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: [Dovecot] Plugins
Hello ever
ide from set_subscribed() I believe.but
maybe there's a better spot I'm not thinking of? One thing I've learned
with Dovecot is that it somehow supports things I didn't believe it
could/would, so I thought I'd ask.
Tony
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:07 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
For migration possibilities, we're considering whether it's possible to
have Dovecot run some users using standard Maildir format, while other
users would be using filesystem (LAYOUT=fs) format?
Thanks Brian for pointing me in the right direction...got it!
Tony
Brian Hayden wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Tony Rutherford wrote:
For migration possibilities, we're considering whether it's possible
to have Dovecot run some users using standard Maildir format, while
o
is
information, and is it even part of the Dovecot design to deal with this
scenario?
Thanks,
Tony
We are looking to develop a plugin against the 1.2.X line (8 as of right now).
Seeing that v2.0 is not too far off, is there any reason to think that a plugin
developed for 1.2.X would NOT be compatible with the 2.0 line?Thanks,Tony
This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to
-Mail, etc.Thanks,...Tony
This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited. If you
believe you received this message in error, please notify
the sender and delete from your system.
seems getmail supports multidrop retriever which might fit the
bill. However I could not figure out how to set up an account that can
be used to fetch all messages for all virtual accounts. Is it possible
at all?
thanks,
Tony
PS: here is my config:
# dovecot -n
# 1.1.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
seems getmail supports multidrop retriever which might fit the
bill. However I could not figure out how to set up an account that can
be used to fetch all messages for all virtual accounts. Is it possible
at all?
thanks,
Tony
PS: here is my config:
# dovecot -n
# 1.1.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
return;
}
is this really correct?
if so it migth be a good idea to at least print different errors
Tony
process is also counted as mail_process other than imap
and pop3?
Tony
vecot-uidlist instead of using dotlock mechanism?
It is creating maintenance problems if I need to remove those stale
lock files everytime clients hit this problem
Tony.
ever and I noticed that dovecot is trying to acquire a lock but
unsuccessful since the lock file is in place. Is it possible to use
file locking other than dotlock on FreeBSD NFS mounted homedir? How do
I achieve this?
Thanks a lot.
Tony Tsang.
Hi all,
I am writing a plugin to override some built-in imap commands. But
when client logs out, imap segfaults during unregistering commands.
What is the correct procedure for overriding imap commands in dovecot?
Thanks.
Tony Tsang.
Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestions. I have used patch to UW IMAP to support
maildir, the problem is dovecot uses dot for delimiter, while the
patch for UW IMAP uses slash. So UW IMAP and dovecot have different
directory structure. If this is configurable in dovecot, it would be
nice.
Tony.
On
by UW-IMAP?
Thanks a lot.
Tony.
78 matches
Mail list logo
