> "@lbutlr" == @lbutlr writes:
@lbutlr> On 30 Apr 2021, at 01:20, Arjen de Korte
wrote:
>> Citeren "@lbutlr" :
>>
>>> When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX
>>> records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP servers,
>>> allowing users to
On 30 Apr 2021, at 13:47, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> Because of this, I've changed my company's various email
> autoconfigure/autodiscover hints and help pages to recommend configuring
> new clients using port 993 for IMAP
The is the right choice, though port 993 is IMAPS, not IMAP. I did not even
On 4/29/21 2:22 AM, Steve Dondley wrote:
> Some more nuttiness: I bit the bullet and downloaded a trial version of
> MS 365 and downloaded the Outlook desktop. On my mac, at least, there
> are two different interfaces/version of Outlook: the "old" Outlook and a
> "new," more minimalist version. Yo
On 2021-04-30 09:20, Arjen de Korte wrote:
Citeren "@lbutlr" :
When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the
MX records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP
servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain
prefix.
No one does this.
On 2021-04-30 09:13, @lbutlr wrote:
When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX
records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP
servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain
prefix.
checking mx is simple, but it might not be the rig
Le 30/04/2021 à 19:06, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On 2021-04-30 03:48, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>> On 29-04-2021 23:08, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> On 29 Apr 2021, at 03:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
I am totally unfamiliar with Exchange servers. What do they offer,
exactly, that dovecot/postfix does not (
On 2021-04-30 03:48, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
On 29-04-2021 23:08, @lbutlr wrote:
On 29 Apr 2021, at 03:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
I am totally unfamiliar with Exchange servers. What do they offer,
exactly, that dovecot/postfix does not (besides a revenue stream for
MS)?
A monthly stipend to Micro
On 30/04/2021 08:13, @lbutlr wrote:
When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX records
for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP servers, allowing users
to more easily add (if needed) the domain prefix.
Better to use DNS SVR records than guess from MX
* sebast...@sebbe.eu:
> When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the
> MX records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP
> servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain
> prefix.
As pointed out here before, that approach would not general
Le 30/04/2021 à 11:47, James a écrit :
On 30/04/2021 08:13, @lbutlr wrote:
When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX
records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP
servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain prefix.
Better to
On 30.04.21 09:20, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> Citeren "@lbutlr" :
>> When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX
>> records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP
>> servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain prefix.
>
> Rightfully so.
Citeren "@lbutlr" :
On 30 Apr 2021, at 01:20, Arjen de Korte wrote:
Citeren "@lbutlr" :
When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check
the MX records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and
IMAP servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the
domain
On 30 Apr 2021, at 01:20, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> Citeren "@lbutlr" :
>
>> When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX
>> records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP servers,
>> allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain prefix.
>>
>>
Citeren "@lbutlr" :
When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the
MX records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP
servers, allowing users to more easily add (if needed) the domain
prefix.
No one does this.
Rightfully so. There is absolutely no gua
21 09:14
Till: dovecot mailing list
Ämne: Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?
On 29 Apr 2021, at 19:48, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>
>
> Fact: Exchange (especially hosted) is 2010-ish, Office365 is the buzzword
these days. Microsoft have been trying their best for q
On 29 Apr 2021, at 19:48, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>
>
> Fact: Exchange (especially hosted) is 2010-ish, Office365 is the buzzword
> these days. Microsoft have been trying their best for quite some time now to
> cripple the IMAP support in Outlook as much as they can so that the email
> users wil
On 29-04-2021 23:08, @lbutlr wrote:
On 29 Apr 2021, at 03:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
I am totally unfamiliar with Exchange servers. What do they offer,
exactly, that dovecot/postfix does not (besides a revenue stream for
MS)?
A monthly stipend to Microsoft?
(I think they actuallyy do offer som
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:51:13 -0400, Steve Dondley stated:
>On 2021-04-29 09:40 AM, Steve Dondley wrote:
>>> I am using Outlook without any problems what so ever.
>>>
>>> It sounds to me like you are setting up Outlook to use port 465. In
>>> the
>>> setup screen, set the port to either "25" or "5
On 2021-04-29 09:40 AM, Steve Dondley wrote:
I am using Outlook without any problems what so ever.
It sounds to me like you are setting up Outlook to use port 465. In
the
setup screen, set the port to either "25" or "587". I am using "587"
with "starttls" Your "incoming mail port" will depend
I am using Outlook without any problems what so ever.
It sounds to me like you are setting up Outlook to use port 465. In the
setup screen, set the port to either "25" or "587". I am using "587"
with "starttls" Your "incoming mail port" will depend on how you have
Dovecot configured. I use por
On 29 Apr 2021, at 05:57, Jerry wrote:
> It sounds to me like you are setting up Outlook to use port 465. In the
> setup screen, set the port to either "25" or "587". I am using "587"
> with "starttls" Your "incoming mail port" will depend on how you have
> Dovecot configured. I use port "143" wit
On 29 Apr 2021, at 03:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
> I am totally unfamiliar with Exchange servers. What do they offer, exactly,
> that dovecot/postfix does not (besides a revenue stream for MS)?
A monthly stipend to Microsoft?
(I think they actuallyy do offer some useful tools for things like meet
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:22:45 -0400, Steve Dondley stated:
>On 2021-04-29 01:45 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 28 Apr 2021, at 12:49, Steve Dondley wrote:
>>> I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook
>>> software working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself
>>> since I
On 29/04/2021 10:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-29 01:45 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 28 Apr 2021, at 12:49, Steve Dondley wrote:
I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software
working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I
don't have Outlook and it wou
On 2021-04-29 01:45 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 28 Apr 2021, at 12:49, Steve Dondley wrote:
I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software
working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I
don't have Outlook and it would be impossible to keep up with all the
d
On 28 Apr 2021, at 12:49, Steve Dondley wrote:
> I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software working
> well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I don't have Outlook
> and it would be impossible to keep up with all the different versions anyway.
How old i
I think my problem might be here. Instead of %Ln, maybe I should have
%L%n?
Nope: https://wiki.dovecot.org/DomainLost
On 2021-04-28 02:49 PM, Steve Dondley wrote:
I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software
working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I
don't have Outlook and it would be impossible to keep up with all the
different versions anyway.
I've got the follo
Your best bet to make Outlook behave better as an IMAP client is to
configure a mail "profile" via
Control Pannel --> User Accounts --> Mail, and set all the particulars
there. Recent versions of Outlook have a stripped down configuration
interface that offers no flexibility. For example, from
On Wednesday, 28 April 2021 13:49:03 CDT Steve Dondley wrote:
> I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software
> working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I don't
> have Outlook and it would be impossible to keep up with all the
> different versions a
I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software
working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I don't
have Outlook and it would be impossible to keep up with all the
different versions anyway.
I've got the following settings, currently:
disable_plaintex
31 matches
Mail list logo
