al Message-
From: David Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
> Curiously enough I think that a relative path is working. I kinda took
> it f
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
> Curiously enough I think that a relative path is working. I kinda took
> it for granted that it did not from the comment
: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
> Curiously enough I think that a relative path is working. I kinda took
> it for granted that it did not from the comments here and the other
> posting.
Felicitations.
> I have another question though. Wh
> Curiously enough I think that a relative path is working. I kinda took
> it for granted that it did not from the comments here and the other
> posting.
Felicitations.
> I have another question though. Why would code such as this build on
> VS.Net then fail on the draco nant build:
>
> For i As
- 1
If I declare the integer first it works in draco.
-Original Message-
From: David Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
> Hehe, wel
> Hehe, well I just posted on the nant list about relative paths in
> . This is the most obvious solution and maybe I'll look at the
> nant source for this task and see what I can do.
Good luck. I'll watch the fireworks with interest. There are some
smarter people than I on that list, so perhaps
July 17, 2004 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
> N. I want CI. Damn. Is it possible to just make draco run on a
> single thread to solve this problem?
Not TMK. I'd be happy to learn otherwise
> N. I want CI. Damn. Is it possible to just make draco run on a
> single thread to solve this problem?
Not TMK. I'd be happy to learn otherwise. You and I are at the foci of
many tangential "feature" collisions in several otherwise well-designed
apps. ;) I love Draco and I love NAnt; I ev
]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
> Anyone see any issues with this?
Yes. How are you going to work around build collisions when the same
build is launched within seco
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:draconet-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan D. Andrews
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 9:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE:
[Draconet-users]
> Vault and Draconet
test
environment if desired.
Anyone see any issues with this?
-Original Message-
From: Bryan D. Andrews
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
Couple of things. We generally
environment in this location as well.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: David Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with NAnt.Solution task [was RE: [Draconet-users]
Vault and Draconet?]
Bryan,
The reason you won't get hi
t; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:draconet-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Robinson
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 7:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
>
> Hi,
>
> I attempted to
t; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:draconet-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Robinson
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 7:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
>
> Hi,
>
> I attempted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bryan D.
> Andrews
> Sent: 16 July 2004 21:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
>
>
> I got this fixed. Can you tell me how I should configure this Nant
> solution task with Draco
By the way a search on Draconet and webmap comes up with only one hit.
:(
-Original Message-
From: Bryan D. Andrews
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
I got this fixed. Can you tell me how I should configure this
ect.vbproj" />
-Original Message-
From: Nick Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
You would need to modify the sourcec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bryan D.
> Andrews
> Sent: 16 July 2004 14:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
>
>
> So I got this working as per James Guerts blog entry, but I am having
> problems with
nant script manually from that location?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Bryan D. Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
Yes we run Draco and Subversion successfully. Works great and out of the
box. Wish Vault
David Reed wrote:
Anybody out there using Subversion with Draco? Successfully? ;)
I use Subversion with Draco, and have been for months. I have no
complaints with Draco's Subversion support.
Jeremy
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 11:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan D. Andrews
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Draconet-users] Vau
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan D. Andrews
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Draconet-users] Vault and Draconet?
>
> Anyone got this going? Any advice or suggestions?
Yeah, Subversion and Draco.
Actually, it'd be nice if you'd be the guinea pig
22 matches
Mail list logo