Greetings,
I was compiling the tdfx.o module and I get these errors when I do
a make -f Makefile.linux in the
xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel directory.
make -f Makefile.linux
=== KERNEL HEADERS IN /lib/modules/2.4.2-2/build/include
=== SMP=1 MODULES
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 19:05, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Very much agreed. This is moreso even for standard XFree86
> driver development (2D et al.), and porting old 3.3.6 driver to
> 4.x.
Yes, I would love to see the CyberBlade on my laptop at least do 2D right
(Working correctly only in 1
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:29:03PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:41, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> >
> > > I have the Rage Pro docs from ATI, I would now like to know *how* I can
> > > get the source of the driver that people are working on currently for
> this
>
> On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:41, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
>
> > I have the Rage Pro docs from ATI, I would now like to know *how* I can
> > get the source of the driver that people are working on currently for
this
> > chip. Also I would like some information on what part of the driver I
> >
On Tuesday 18 Sep 2001 7:10 pm, you wrote:
> Although security through obscurity is not a good solution, it is
> effective to a certain degree. To my knowledge, no security holes have
> been found in the NVIDIA drivers. They need to be found to be exploited,
> and finding them is more difficult w
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 07:05:59PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Daryll, are there dri project private lists I presume that could
> be extended to new developers similar to XFree86's developmental
> list?
There aren't really any at this point. We discussed most things in
public, and sometimes
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Ian D Romanick wrote:
>Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Ian D Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>List-Id:
>Subject: Re: Discussion of donation driven DRI project.
>
>> IMHO the whole idea of bein
Check the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file again.
It looks like your loading older modules from XFree86 4.0.x rather than
the 4.1.0 ones.
Alan.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:27:05AM -0500, Mark Bainter wrote:
>
> Note: I posted this on the dri-users list about a week or so ago
> and no-one there
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:41, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> I have the Rage Pro docs from ATI, I would now like to know *how* I can
> get the source of the driver that people are working on currently for this
> chip. Also I would like some information on what part of the driver I
> need to loo
Hey everyone,
I have the Rage Pro docs from ATI, I would now like to know *how* I can
get the source of the driver that people are working on currently for this
chip. Also I would like some information on what part of the driver I
need to look at.
Thanks-a-million :)
Andreas
___
Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> After reading some people's postings on donating X amount of
> money for feature Y, and the like, I thought about it and come to
> the conclusion that donation driven DRI project even partially is
> quite unrealistic. I'd like to discuss why I think that is so.
Mik
Will Newton wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 18 Sep 2001 4:36 pm, you wrote:
>
> > > Look at it this way: a couple of security holes have been found in the
> > > DRI drivers, and fixed. What's in the nVidia drivers?
> >
> > What's in any binary application or driver you install?
>
> I don't know. Er, that
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:35:33PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> 1. Who is going to take on the leadership position for the project? Although
> this is a community project we do need somebody in charge to act as a sort
> of "project lead" and contact person for people outside of the project.
> Cur
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:12:34PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> What are the odds of the project coming under the XFree86 umbrella? AFAIK the
> only reason that DRI was outside of XFRee86 was because it began at PI, and
> then when it moved to VA Linux they hosted it on Sourceforge (?).
>
> XFree
> IMHO the whole idea of being donation-driven, is for the monetary
> donations to be a motivator.
The one place where donations would help is in getting hardware for
spare-timers. Over the past two years I can't even begin to count the
number of times that I've heard "I can't work on that part
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Will Newton wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 Sep 2001 4:36 pm, you wrote:
>
> > > Look at it this way: a couple of security holes have been found in the
> > > DRI drivers, and fixed. What's in the nVidia drivers?
> >
> > What's in any binary application or driver you install?
>
> I
I think Frank's outline of future plans is a good start but let me toss in
my 2 cents.
Overall, I would like to see some focus shift from just developing drivers
to ensuring the infrastructure remains solid and up to date. We can beg
hardware manufacturers all we want to release specs but som
On Tuesday 18 Sep 2001 4:36 pm, you wrote:
> > Look at it this way: a couple of security holes have been found in the
> > DRI drivers, and fixed. What's in the nVidia drivers?
>
> What's in any binary application or driver you install?
I don't know. Er, that's my point...
> > People are willing
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Will Newton wrote:
> On Monday 17 Sep 2001 9:16 pm, you wrote:
>
> > There's no good reason why you couldn't put an NVIDIA card in a sever
> > and use the open source 2D driver. You wouldn't want to enable DRI on
> > you server, either, because of lockup issues.
>
> Look
Note: I posted this on the dri-users list about a week or so ago
and no-one there was able to help me. I'm still not convinced
it's a bug, but I can't figure it out either. Advice would be
appreciated.
Also, everything (DRI, the mga driver, etc) is built into my kernel.
Ok, I think
Will Newton wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 18 Sep 2001 7:35 am, you wrote:
>
> > I think it is too early to put a donation page up on the website. Before we
> > can do anything like that a few important details have to be sorted out ...
>
> What are the odds of the project coming under the XFree86 umbre
On Tuesday 18 Sep 2001 7:35 am, you wrote:
> I think it is too early to put a donation page up on the website. Before we
> can do anything like that a few important details have to be sorted out ...
What are the odds of the project coming under the XFree86 umbrella? AFAIK the
only reason that D
On Monday 17 Sep 2001 9:16 pm, you wrote:
> There's no good reason why you couldn't put an NVIDIA card in a sever
> and use the open source 2D driver. You wouldn't want to enable DRI on
> you server, either, because of lockup issues.
Look at it this way: a couple of security holes have been fou
* Frank Worsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
> 4. I think we have to also start a more coordinated effort to get specs from
> the hardware developers. This weekend I will sit down and try to come up
> with a nice document/letter/webpage aimed at management and titled something
> like "Why op
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:16:49PM -0700, Mark Allan wrote:
[..snip..]
> The important thing is to have drivers available from a source you have
> some confidence in. If Linus wrote a binary-only kernel module that
> provided some functionality you require, would you have faith in it?
> Binary o
Several have suggested that some sort of donation driven effort
be made with which to sustain DRI development.
Personally, I hope the DRI project continues on to be a
successful project, and any efforts by anyone to see it does,
hopefully turn out beneficial.
After reading some people's posti
>> Frank Worsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I get it written up I will post it to the list so everybody can
> review it. Once we have made something nice I will either email it
> or mail it to the different companies. Hopefully we can archieve
> something doing that ... what do you a
27 matches
Mail list logo
