On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:01:58 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
Jens,
Are we moving the files in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support
into their relevant ddx drivers directory ?
If you are specifically asking about the xf86drmDriverName.h files in
that
Hi
Some time ago I tried installing the Radeon SDR (32mb,agp) on my box with a tyan
trinity 100at board which has a mvp3 chipset. Unfortunately the result was that X hung
up after less than a minute :-( Same of course with any opengl apps etc. Of course i
had loaded the proper drm-module etc.
Robert,
Great work. You are very thorough in your testing.
Comments inline.
Robert Boucher wrote:
The short answer is everything worked like you expected.
For the details, here are the various configurations I tested (sorry if
this is mangled):
DRM Lib i810 Kernel Module
But now think that:
you have 8 light sources (specular, highlight, abient
nicely mixed),
some 3 to 8 clipper planes,
an exponentional fog function applied,
you are using two sided triangles
and of course misc material sepcifications.
I suspect that under these
Alan Hourihane wrote:
I've tested the gamma anyway - and we're fine.
Great, thanks for testing.
-- /\
Jens Owen/ \/\ _
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ \ \ Steamboat Springs, Colorado
___
Dri-devel
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 09:30:39PM -0800, Raystonn wrote:
OK - so a factor 70 in CPU growth and a factor of 16 in RAM speed.
No, in this 5 year period, processor clockspeed has moved from approximately
200MHz to over 2GHz. This is a factor of 10 in CPU growth and 16 in memory
bandwidth.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:02:45PM +0200, Daniel Kulesz wrote:
So I thought this had to do with the incompatibility between the chipset
and the radeon. But i would really love to use a radeon in my board, cause
the only alternative to it would be a voodoo4 which is by far slower and
doesnt
I seem to recall there being problems with the AGP driver for this chipset
in the past, but my brain has trouble remembering things from that long ago.
:) What kernel version are you using? Perhaps Jeff can comment on this...
I am using kernel 2.4.18 and was using 2.4.17 when I tried the
[Note: This e-mail get's into some additional design discussions, so I'm
adding anybody who has responded to this thread directly to the CC list,
to circumvent the sourceforge e-mail log jam.]
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:01:58 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan Hourihane
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 17:11:26 -0800
Raystonn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, some details were left out of CPU performance increases. The same was
done for memory performance increases though. We have been discussing
memory bandwidth as memory performance, completely leaving out memory
latency,
Brain wrote:
Dieter Nützel wrote:
On Wednesday, March 2002-04-03 22:05:47, Brian Paul wrote:
-- Dieter N=FCtzel wrote:
=20
One more:
Brian, is the latest Mesa-4.0.2 stuff already merged?
The trunk is has the latest 4.0.2 code now.
Sorry Brian,
but after your
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 2:31 am, David Bronaugh wrote:
The P200 pulled off about 75MBytes/sec; the P2-266 pulled off about 55
MBytes/sec; the K6-III/550 pulled off about 100MBytes/sec. All of this was
done under Linux; tests were performed with memtest86 (? it's been a while,
basically
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM -0800, Jens Owen wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
Module name: xc
Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/
Changes by: jensowen@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/04/04 10:06:11
Log message:
Converted MGA driver
Jens Owen wrote:
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM -0800, Jens Owen wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
Module name: xc
Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/
Changes by: jensowen@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/04/04 10:06:11
Log message:
14 matches
Mail list logo
