[Dri-devel] Good Afternoon dri-devel, Free Money Secrets Revealed! jqvf

2002-10-15 Thread Arlo Brintnell
NO Selling! You make money 24/7 through our simple turnkey system You start earning money quickly! And you get paid over and over for work you've already done! Great support and training! Deardri-devel, By now you've probablyseen every opportunity

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Stefan Lange
Brian Paul wrote: [...] I did some testing with the mesa-4-1-branch today on my r200. Compiling was less trouble than I expected, everything was pretty much straight forward ;-) I'd appreciate it if people could start testing this branch, esp the drivers I haven't tested. One thing in

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Brian Paul
Stefan Lange wrote: Brian Paul wrote: [...] I did some testing with the mesa-4-1-branch today on my r200. Compiling was less trouble than I expected, everything was pretty much straight forward ;-) I'd appreciate it if people could start testing this branch, esp the drivers I

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Russ Dill
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:01, Stefan Lange wrote: Q3A: stable (at least for the time I tested), but not very fast. In fact it shows the same symptoms I got with earlier versions of DRI-trunk (before around 2002-10-11): poor overall speed, and a framerate that maxes out at 50 FPS. Is the

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Keith Whitwell
Russ Dill wrote: On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:01, Stefan Lange wrote: Q3A: stable (at least for the time I tested), but not very fast. In fact it shows the same symptoms I got with earlier versions of DRI-trunk (before around 2002-10-11): poor overall speed, and a framerate that maxes out at

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Stefan Lange
Keith Whitwell wrote: Russ Dill wrote: On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:01, Stefan Lange wrote: Q3A: stable (at least for the time I tested), but not very fast. In fact it shows the same symptoms I got with earlier versions of DRI-trunk (before around 2002-10-11): poor overall speed, and a

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Brian Paul
Brian Paul wrote: Stefan Lange wrote: My experiences from testing: Wolfenstein (single-player): works, about same speed as dri-trunk, but not completely stable (exited with Signal 4 in one run, and Signal 11 in another, and once I got a complete lockup of the system) Q3A: stable (at

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Stefan Lange
Brian Paul wrote: Brian Paul wrote: Stefan Lange wrote: My experiences from testing: Wolfenstein (single-player): works, about same speed as dri-trunk, but not completely stable (exited with Signal 4 in one run, and Signal 11 in another, and once I got a complete lockup of the system)

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Brian Paul
Stefan Lange wrote: Brian Paul wrote: The merge is done. OK, so I just updated from CVS and recompiled. as expected: the speed problem in q3a is solved ;-) Great. Setting R200_NO_TCL works for me - no signals or FP exceptions. However, with R200_NO_TCL I'm seeing some

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa 4.1 branch

2002-10-15 Thread Keith Whitwell
hmm, that's odd. I still get floating point exceptions for almost every GL-app. with TCL disabled. Demos that _do_ work with TCL disabled include: clearspd, drawpix, gamma, glinfo, lodbias, readpix, winpos Maybe this can give you a clue, why some are working and some aren't? Could I

Re: [Dri-devel] Backing store on Radeon?

2002-10-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2002-10-15 at 20:30, Ian Romanick wrote: Warning: ignorant questions on the way... I've gotten some questions from a couple of people about backing store with DRI, on the R100 driver specifically. Because my background isn't firmly rooted in X-Windows, I wasn't really familiar with