On Friday 08 October 2004 08:08, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 05:37:30 -0300
>
> "Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:57, Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:43, Keith Whitw
On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:57, Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:43, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:37, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > >>On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:04:02 -0300
> > >>&
On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:43, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:37, Felix Kühling wrote:
> >>On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:04:02 -0300
> >>"Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, did th
On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:37, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:04:02 -0300
> "Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There may be a problem with the new glxgears from X.org. When I run it
> alone I get the full framerate I can expect (~385 fps
On Thursday 07 October 2004 09:25, you wrote:
> Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> The reason AGPFastWrite is an option is that it is known to cause lockups.
> On my 845 box + r200 card, it is a guaranteed lockup, for instance.
>
> Keith
I imagined that. But I think that at least here
On Thursday 07 October 2004 00:43, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:39:23 -0300, Paulo R. Dallan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 October 2004 09:58, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:40:17 -0300, Paulo R. Dallan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 09:58, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:40:17 -0300, Paulo R. Dallan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 October 2004 19:56, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Use ldd to check glxgears and make sure it's using the right libGL.
>
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 10:46, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 October 2004 05:36, Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:43, you wrote:
> >>> Paulo R. Dallan schrieb:
>I
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 05:36, Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:43, you wrote:
> > Paulo R. Dallan schrieb:
> Hi Philipp, thanks for the reply!
>
> Are you sure about that?
>
> I've just tried the "ati" generic driver (opti
> Tried to reproduce the lockup problem, rebooting and re-starting x - to no
> effect untill now. Anyway, there is still the performance issue (the
> hardware acceleration still is aparently quite "slow").
Ok, some progress here.
Managed to get to the point I was before 400 FPS, and to *repro
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:43, you wrote:
> Paulo R. Dallan schrieb:
> The radeon driver is a hardware-accelerated driver for Radeon 7500
> chips. I don't know why it even works on your card.
>
> Philipp
Hi Philipp, thanks for the reply!
Are you sure about that?
I
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:23, Paulo R. Dallan wrote:
> Ok, things are getting worse.
> The solution (for have an x-server operational for the moment) was to run
> xorgconfig again and selected the generic *radeon* drive (is it the same as
> the hardware accelerated one?). Af
Ok, things are getting worse.
After I installed the dri drivers, i had only re-started the x-server - and
acceleration worked but not as expected, as mentioned before.
After a reboot, when trying to start x, i did modprobe radeon (ok), and issued
the startx command. The system locked up. I coul
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 19:56, Dave Airlie wrote:
> your still doing soft rendering at a guess... glxinfo and check Direct
> Rendering: Yes...
>
> Dave.
Hi Dave! Thank you for the tip, but I don't think so... have a look here:
> > Log file:
> > (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled
> >
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 15:51, Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:42:44 -0300
>
> "Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The relevant parts of dmesg (at least that I could identify) are:
> >
> > mtrr: 0xe800,0x800 overl
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 10:24, Adam Luchjenbroers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Trying to help a friend fix his computer, it appears to be attempting to
> drive the monitor at refresh rates in excess of what it can handle and
> exceeding the values it has been given
Em Seg 15 Mar 2004 18:44, you wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:30:48 -0300
>
> "Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Em Ter 09 Mar 2004 20:09, you wrote:
> > > "Paulo R. Dallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Em
Em Seg 01 Mar 2004 14:09, Alex Deucher escreveu:
> I just checked out a fresh copy of mesa and the dri and I can't get it
> to build:
>
> ../lib/GL/mesa/x86/3dnow_xform4.o
> ../../../../../lib/GL/mesa/x86/sse.o
> ../../../../../lib/GL/mesa/x86/sse_normal.o
> ../../../../../lib/GL/mesa/x86/sse_xform
18 matches
Mail list logo