Since my last reached the list I'm sending this one again. I hope it
doesn't get duplicated though.
It seems that there are some problems on the i8x0 DRM drivers with recent
kernels as stated below.
José Fonseca
On 2002.02.27 16:19 Thomas Dodd wrote:
Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Luckily, after se
Quoting Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are two parts to this. There is the assembly coded parts of Mesa
> (for 3Dnow & SSE) and there are compile switches for GCC. For example, we may
> wish to see if there are any benefits to building a version with
> '-mcpu=i686' or '-mcpu=k6' or
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:47:07AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > anyone is interested in athlon-compiled binary drivers, I can help (but
> > not
> > before march 4th).
>
> I think that there is no reason for not enabling every optimization in
> Mes
On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
>
> Some good news, just when I'm away from school! (and its great connection
> :) ).
> But just a thought: it looks like you use the "standard" host.def for the
>
> mach64 build. And the last time I checked out the branch, the #define
> MesaUse
Quoting Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> f
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:59:01PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree 4.2.0
> > > > installation?
> > > >
> > > No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> > > be
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:54:22PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> But on a daily basis!? At least this was the initial plan..
>
> I was thinking in using a script that made some kind of rotation
> eliminating old releases, only adding a snapshot when there were
> differences, etc... This can be d
Is the idea here to have daily/weekly (or whatever) CVS snapshots or to
start an incremental release process seperate from XFree86 releases (i.e.,
with release tags)?
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I have a web stati
On 2002.02.22 22:49 Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I have a web statistics package on my webserver
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/cgi-bin/awstats.pl were one could get that
> > information.
> >
> > This doesn't mean that I won't put my stu
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> I have a web statistics package on my webserver
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/cgi-bin/awstats.pl were one could get that
> information.
>
> This doesn't mean that I won't put my stuff on DRI website: I've sent an
> email to Frank a
On 2002.02.22 22:27 Brian Paul wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> >
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
> >
> > Unfortunately, as you can notice the packa
On 2002.02.22 22:00 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> >
> > hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> > Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two
> sets
> > of drivers:
> > - one with everything included, including debugging info
> > - another
On 2002.02.22 22:12 Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> > Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two
> sets
> :)) I do not like to complain as much as you can think:). But GATOS
> binary snapshots drivers
Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> file list of the i810
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:59:01PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > >
> > > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree 4.2.0
> > > installation?
> > >
> > No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> > be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
>
>
> hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two sets
:)) I do not like to complain as much as you can think:). But GATOS
binary snapshots drivers are only 190K! Even if dri will be 5 times
larger - it
On 2002.02.22 22:02 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:38:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > >>
> > >No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> > >be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
> > >
> > >Alan.
> > >
> >
> > hmmm.. the only way I see to make ev
>
> hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two sets
> of drivers:
> - one with everything included, including debugging info
> - another with stripped binaries and without the libraries that do
> >
> > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree 4.2.0
> > installation?
> >
> No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
I think we have to look at the scope of what we're trying to do: provide an
updat
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:53:50PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Jos Fonseca wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > > > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:38:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> >>
> >No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> >be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
> >
> >Alan.
> >
>
> hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> Sergey complaining abou
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Jos Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > > > sucessful
On 2002.02.22 21:35 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:17:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >What I meant is from a bug standpoint. If there's a bug in Mesa which
> > >is fixed, then libGLcore.a needs to be replaced. This is
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:17:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, Jos Fonseca wrote:
> >> On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >> >...
> >> >libGLcore.a is the internal Mesa code that drives indirect GLX.
>
On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >libGLcore.a is the internal Mesa code that drives indirect GLX.
> > >
> > >If anything changes in Mesa, libGLcore.a changes too.
> >
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >> Jos Fonseca wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >> > > ...
> >> > > What is libGLcore.a? I
On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Jos Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > What is libGLcore.a? Is that actually used?
> > > >
> > > > Keith
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is res
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jos Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > > sucessfully. The generated packages are available
José Fonseca wrote:
>
> On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> > >
> > > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
> > >
> >
On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> >
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
> >
> > Unfortunately, as you can notice the p
Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> file list of the i810
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:15:00PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > sucessfully. The generated packages are av
I've also put the my (incredible simple and featureless) script for
doing this at the scripts/ subdirectory.
Jose Fonseca
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 16:56, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
>
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> >
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
Just a comment. Why don't you put these up on the DRI pa
Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
file list of the i810 driver. libGLcore, e.g., is 18 MB..!
Hi,
I'm just posting to say that I haven't forgot the promise to provide
DRI binary driver snapshots.
The Alan's scripts are indeed great and do most of the work.
I'm just making an wrapper script to them, that synchronizes the local
tree with CVS, builds it, and then call dripkg.sh to packag
37 matches
Mail list logo
