Hi Liam,
I think the site is ready for primetime. Do the transition all in one go
when you are ready, if you need help let me know.
One last comment I have, on the Contribute page, the Developer
Documentation link should maybe link to an anchor on the docs page. That
way the user doesn't have to
> > otherwise alphbetically eg Manufacturers & Distros (I'll fix distro's now)
>
> Then you only have to fix status.phtml (Supported Cards) to make it equally to
> links.phtml (Graphics Card Manufacturers).
Well spotted, I'll make the status.phtml alphabetical.
cheers
Liam
--
Am Samstag, 28. September 2002 20:41 schrieb Smitty:
> Op Saterdag, 28 September 2002 20:27:01 Dieter Nützel het geskryf:
> > Am Samstag, 28. September 2002 19:57 schrieb Smitty:
> > > > What about the main central archive?
> > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Ddri-devel&r=3D1&w=3D2
> > > >
>
Op Saterdag, 28 September 2002 20:27:01 Dieter Nützel het geskryf:
> Am Samstag, 28. September 2002 19:57 schrieb Smitty:
>
> > > What about the main central archive?
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Ddri-devel&r=3D1&w=3D2
> > >
> > > It is fast and dany.
> >
> > I've added your link but,
Am Samstag, 28. September 2002 19:57 schrieb Smitty:
> > What about the main central archive?
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Ddri-devel&r=3D1&w=3D2
> >
> > It is fast and dany.
>
> I've added your link but, only the one to dri-devel, I'm reasonably sure
> they can figure out how to get dri
> > 1. For the mailing list info, there is a link to the old Geocrawler
> > archives. I think that should probably be removed because SF.net has th=
> eir
> > own archives now and they also include the content from the old Geocraw=
> ler
> > archives. You can already get to the SF.net archives by
> > btw what about now?
>
> Much, much better. I have a few more comments though . ;)
Refer to my email about a certain cycle.
> 1. For the mailing list info, there is a link to the old Geocrawler
> archives. I think that should probably be removed because SF.net has their
> own archives
Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 06:19 schrieb Frank Worsley:
> > btw what about now?
>
> Much, much better. I have a few more comments though . ;)
>
> 1. For the mailing list info, there is a link to the old Geocrawler
> archives. I think that should probably be removed because SF.net has their
> btw what about now?
Much, much better. I have a few more comments though . ;)
1. For the mailing list info, there is a link to the old Geocrawler
archives. I think that should probably be removed because SF.net has their
own archives now and they also include the content from the old Geocr
> > I would also recommend that you work together with Nick Leippe.
>
> Just a quick note to say that I'm still here and happy to help.
> My modified version is up for grabs to pick and choose from still at
> http://lfm.sourceforge.net/dritest/
Sorry I managed to miss a whole bunch of posts, read
> > I think it is much too early for this kind of criticism. While the
> > updated website is far from perfect and finished, I definetely think it
> > is a clear improvement with respect to the former version.
>
> I don't see how it is too early for criticism. Liam has indicated
> several time
> > I would say that Effecting a full scale 'all in one go' transition is
> > VERY hard. I would suggest letting Liam make the poage official, and
> > continue refining the layout.
>
> I don't see how a transition in one go is very hard at all. The DRI
> website is fairly small, all you have to
> > Speaking of the new web site, could someone please remove the section
> > in the FAQ that says that various NDA'd documentation can be obtained
> > by becoming an XFree86 Project member.
>
> I'm sure someone could do that, could you point out where this is,
> I'm certainly not about to read
> > Speaking of the new web site, could someone please remove the section
> > in the FAQ that says that various NDA'd documentation can be obtained
> > by becoming an XFree86 Project member.
>
> I'm sure someone could do that, could you point out where this is,
> I'm certainly not about to read
> Speaking of the new web site, could someone please remove the section
> in the FAQ that says that various NDA'd documentation can be obtained
> by becoming an XFree86 Project member.
I'm sure someone could do that, could you point out where this is,
I'm certainly not about to read all the FAQ
> > > Ok, I would remove CVS and IRC Logs from that page. They should
> > > re-appear on the "Contribute" page.
> > IRC is already gone, I'm leaving CVS there (for now at least) because
> > is working on scripts to pull CVs, compile etc
>
> Why do you need to leave the CVS information there?
>
> Howzit Frank?
>
> > Ok, I would remove CVS and IRC Logs from that page. They should
> > re-appear on the "Contribute" page.
> IRC is already gone, I'm leaving CVS there (for now at least) because
> is working on scripts to pull CVs, compile etc
Why do you need to leave the CVS information th
Howzit Frank?
> > Quite frankly (no pun intended) IRC logs are about the only thing out of
> > place, and when I look at that page I wonder if I should remove them,
> > however your idea to split documentation back out of help will draw
> > attention back to them on that page meaning they can be
Speaking of the new web site, could someone please remove the section
in the FAQ that says that various NDA'd documentation can be obtained
by becoming an XFree86 Project member.
Anyone who applies for XFree86 membership in order to obtain access to
NDA'd documentation will be rejected. The XFre
Two more things that really bug me... :)
1. The large top frame with the logo takes up a lot of screen space. I
really don't think it's needed and it would look nicer if you removed it
or made it smaller.
2. I think you should remove the border around the main logo on the home
page. ie: border=0
Hi Liam,
> No offence intended but no, I just think the orignal site looks "none too
> nice" so does he AFAIK.
None taken.
> Quite frankly (no pun intended) IRC logs are about the only thing out of
> place, and when I look at that page I wonder if I should remove them,
> however your idea to s
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:24:37 -0700
Frank Worsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That hasn't happened (accepted and moved) so I haven't asked.
>
> I think there is two problems here ...
>
> 1. Since this is an open-source project there is no single person to
> approve the website. Basically I d
> >
> > Which reminds me /dri/htdocs/ is a real mess and I can't clean it up because
> > I don't have rights to delete things (I think) because the permisions set are
> > for the dri / sourceforge *login* not the *group* dri.
>
> I don't understand. As it is now:
>
> % ls -l
>
> drwxrwsr-x
Hello Ian,
> I would say that Effecting a full scale 'all in one go' transition is
> VERY hard. I would suggest letting Liam make the poage official, and
> continue refining the layout.
I don't see how a transition in one go is very hard at all. The DRI
website is fairly small, all you have to d
Hi Pawel,
> I think it is much too early for this kind of criticism. While the
> updated website is far from perfect and finished, I definetely think it
> is a clear improvement with respect to the former version.
I don't see how it is too early for criticism. Liam has indicated
several times
Smitty wrote:
>
> Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>>There's a typo on the Radeon features webpage:
>>
>>http://dri.sourceforge.net/other/radeon_dri_features.html
>>
>>At the bottom it has "IcDT Gatos"
>>
>>Should be iDCT
>>
>>(Discreet Cosine Transform)
>
> IIRC I wasn't worried how I spelled it
On 2002.09.23 06:24 Frank Worsley wrote:
> 2. The main problem Ian Molton and you seem to have with the current
> site is that content is hard to find. That is probably a good point,
> but I think the way you have reorganized the content is even worse.
I think it is much too early for this kind
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:24:37 -0700
Frank Worsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. The main problem Ian Molton and you seem to have with the current
> site is that content is hard to find. That is probably a good point,
> but I think the way you have reorganized the content is even worse.
I wou
On Sunday 22 September 2002 10:24 pm, you wrote:
> I would also recommend that you work together with Nick Leippe.
>
Just a quick note to say that I'm still here and happy to help.
My modified version is up for grabs to pick and choose from still at
http://lfm.sourceforge.net/dritest/
If you a
> That hasn't happened (accepted and moved) so I haven't asked.
I think there is two problems here ...
1. Since this is an open-source project there is no single person to
approve the website. Basically I don't think you will get 'approval'
from the group as a whole until your new site has some
Mike A. Harris wrote:
> There's a typo on the Radeon features webpage:
>
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/other/radeon_dri_features.html
>
> At the bottom it has "IcDT Gatos"
>
> Should be iDCT
>
> (Discreet Cosine Transform)
IIRC I wasn't worried how I spelled it originally as it was RFC s
31 matches
Mail list logo
