[Dri-devel] SiS DRI update

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-15.diff Fixed the DeleteTexture problem (which was seen in glxinfo and tuxracer in the form of segfaults) with a workaround. In the radeon and r128 drivers there's: /* free the Mesa context */ rmesa->glCtx->DriverC

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 20:45, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > > > >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > > >> > > >>>My current diff is at: > > >

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-03 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > >> > >>>My current diff is at: > >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > >>>

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-02 Thread Ian Romanick
Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:22, Ian Romanick wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: * Not sure if the fogging in fire is correct -- it looks like I would expect it to, but it disagrees with software rendering. That is common. The sw path does per-pixel fog calculations and the hw

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Whitwell
Eric Anholt wrote: As some of you have heard, I'm working on getting the SiS DRI working again. It's been quite a lot of work, particularly given my lack of knowledge about OpenGL or the structure of the client drivers. However, I am to the point where I can run several mesa demos (gears, fire, t

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Whitwell
Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or without sisfb. I h

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > > My current diff is at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > > > > It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or > > without sisfb. I

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-31 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > My current diff is at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > > It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or > without sisfb. I haven't tested the linux-without-sisfb case, though. > > My progress so

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-30 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:22, Ian Romanick wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > My current diff is at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > > Since building the SiS driver is disabled, I don't see any reason to not > commit your changes. This will allow more adventureous pe

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-30 Thread Ian Romanick
Eric Anholt wrote: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff Since building the SiS driver is disabled, I don't see any reason to not commit your changes. This will allow more adventureous people to start testing. :) It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-29 Thread Eric Anholt
My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or without sisfb. I haven't tested the linux-without-sisfb case, though. My progress so far: * glxgears, geartrain, tunnel, ipers, fire, multiarb,

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Alex Deucher
there are docs for the 300 series on utah-glx, but they are 2D only it looks like: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=1098&release_id=77440 Alex --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As some of you have heard, I'm working on getting the SiS DRI working > again. It's bee

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Alex Deucher
There are no sis docs available for any thing newer than the 6326 as far as I know (the 6326 docs were on the dri downloads page for a while). There is also a utah-glx driver for the 6326. Sis wrote the DRI driver for the 300 series, but I don't think they ever released databooks for it. They ha

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
As some of you have heard, I'm working on getting the SiS DRI working again. It's been quite a lot of work, particularly given my lack of knowledge about OpenGL or the structure of the client drivers. However, I am to the point where I can run several mesa demos (gears, fire, tunnel, multiarb, sp

RE: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI Support and Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.

2001-04-22 Thread ademar
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Ademar, > > looking at your pasted info I see: > I'm using: > kernel 2.4.3 > SiS 6326 chipset > > and > > OpenGL vendor string: Brian Paul > OpenGL renderer string: SiS 300/630/530 DR Mode > OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4 > > As far as I know the Sis 6326 is

RE: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI Support and Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.

2001-04-21 Thread adoniz
Ademar, looking at your pasted info I see: I'm using: kernel 2.4.3 SiS 6326 chipset and OpenGL vendor string: Brian Paul OpenGL renderer string: SiS 300/630/530 DR Mode OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4 As far as I know the Sis 6326 is not the same as the Sis 630. I don't know this with 1

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI Support

2001-04-17 Thread Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Keith Whitwell wrote: > I haven't heard any reports of this working in a long time. > > The author is Sung-Ching Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; try and contact him. If we > don't hear anything the driver should be disabled & removed from the supported > cards list. Hm... Anybody

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI Support

2001-04-17 Thread Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Any plans for SiS support? Anybody knows who did the actual work in the > > kernel? Who is the maintainer? I would like to help in some way. > > > > Thanks in advance. > >- Ademar > > I haven't heard any reports of this working in a long time. >

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI Support

2001-04-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
"Ademar de Souza Reis Jr." wrote: > > Hello all. > > I'm trying to "play" with DRI support for SiS boards on xf-4_0_3 branch. > > After some work, everything is loaded and the log reports it's > working, but when I try to start any app that uses it (ex. tuxracer > or quake3), I get: > > SIS dr

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI Support

2001-04-17 Thread Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.
Hello all. I'm trying to "play" with DRI support for SiS boards on xf-4_0_3 branch. After some work, everything is loaded and the log reports it's working, but when I try to start any app that uses it (ex. tuxracer or quake3), I get: SIS driver : out of video memory Fatal errors in sis_dri.so