there will be any chips in the future for which neither of the current
choices work, the DRI will likely have to be disabled for them anyway.
As for DRIScreenInit - I looked at the code again and its logic appears
correct to me, could you elaborate a bit where you would like the R300
check to appe
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 13:53 -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:50 +0100, Rune Petersen wrote:
> >>
> >> if ( (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R300) ||
> >> (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R350) ||
> >>
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dïnzer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:50 +0100, Rune Petersen wrote:
if ( (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R300) ||
(info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R350) ||
- (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_RV350) )
+ (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_F
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:50 +0100, Rune Petersen wrote:
if ( (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R300) ||
(info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R350) ||
-(info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_RV350) )
+(info->ChipFamily == CHIP
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:50 +0100, Rune Petersen wrote:
>
> if ( (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R300) ||
>(info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_R350) ||
> - (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_RV350) )
> + (info->ChipFamily == CHIP_FAMILY_RV350) ||
> + (info->ChipFamily == CH
Why do you the value is 7 ? According to my docs the number of pipes is a
magic value that should be architecture dependent. Of course, my
documentation is for R300 2d only..
I would expect that there is no easy formula.
The 7 came from fglrx using radeon_dump.
Ahh ! In this case it should be sa
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
Why do you the value is 7 ? According to my docs the number of pipes
is a magic value that should be architecture dependent. Of course, my
documentation is for R300 2d only..
I would expect that there is no easy formula.
The 7 came from fglrx using radeon_dump.
Ahh !
Could you test that your patch works with regular freedesktop.org DRM
driver as far as 2d is concerned ? It should print a message in the log
that DRI is enabled, though, of course, you would not be able to use R300
Mesa driver.
I gave it a try, no problem.
patch: r420_drm-microcode-fix.patch
I
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Rune Petersen wrote:
With the latest changes to drm in r300_driver I was reminded of a few
problems with R420 cards and the r300 driver.
1) the Xorg driver defaults to R200 for R420 cards.
RADEONDRIKernelInit() in radeon_dri.c
Could you test that your patch works with regular
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
3) I can enable more pipes for r420 cards, but am unable to test it
on 420 cards with fewer pipes.
Do I just add this and wait for someone to complain?
A better way would be to read carefully specs of R4xx cards on ATI
website to find out how many actual pipes are avail
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Rune Petersen wrote:
1) the Xorg driver defaults to R200 for R420 cards.
RADEONDRIKernelInit() in radeon_dri.c
Could you test that your patch works with regular freedesktop.org DRM
driver as far as 2d is concerned ? It should print a message in the lo
With the latest changes to drm in r300_driver I was reminded of a few
problems with R420 cards and the r300 driver.
1) the Xorg driver defaults to R200 for R420 cards.
RADEONDRIKernelInit() in radeon_dri.c
2) RADEONInitDispBandwidth() is disabled for r420 cards.
I have no problem enabling this. a
12 matches
Mail list logo
