{Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-07-03 Thread Doug Fitts
--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, "John D. Hays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ray, Maybe HF is the right place for you, I have no way to evaluate. Those of us who are most intrigued by D-STAR, I think in a large part, understand that any new technology will have 'road bumps' and try to figure ou

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-07-02 Thread Brad Rehm
Well put, John. Brad, KV5V On 7/2/08, John D. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ray, > > It might have been presented better, but it is a reasonable analysis to say > that there MAY be a problem with your Internet connection at home. > Sometimes what looks like a reasonable Internet connection on

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-07-02 Thread John D. Hays
Ray, It might have been presented better, but it is a reasonable analysis to say that there MAY be a problem with your Internet connection at home. Sometimes what looks like a reasonable Internet connection on Email and the Web (both using TCP) can fall apart on a UDP circuit, or have problems on

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-07-02 Thread n1tai
r_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 6:13 PM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update Re-read the post: D-STAR RELIABILITY! So don't get your nose

RE: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-07-01 Thread Woodrick, Ed
AIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 6:13 PM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update Re-read the post: D-STAR RELIABILITY! So don't get your nose all out of joint Nate. Simple ques

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread Nate Duehr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Re-read the post: > D-STAR RELIABILITY! I see a "!" ... did you mean to type a "?" > So don't get your nose all out of joint Nate. I'm rarely bothered by mailing list mail, it was just that your message didn't sound all that sincere as a question. There are a lot o

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread Tony Langdon
At 08:12 AM 7/1/2008, you wrote: >So don't get your nose all out of joint Nate. >Simple question about the reliability of D-Star as I am still one of >those that are not convinced that Digital is the way to go, >eg...Cell phones are digital and now we have radio that is digital. >Soon there will

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread n1tai
Re-read the post: D-STAR RELIABILITY! So don't get your nose all out of joint Nate. Simple question about the reliability of D-Star as I am still one of those that are not convinced that Digital is the way to go, eg...Cell phones are digital and now we have radio that is digital. Soon there will

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread Daniel G. Thompson
. None of the Motorola, RCA or Midland equipment in the room had a problem, just DStar. Dan Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Nate Duehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:52 PM Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re:

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread Nate Duehr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > D-Star reliability! > Or is it Operator / Equipment error? Re-read the message: The POWER SUPPLY failed. You message reads like you just want to pick on D-STAR, and your question then comes off as not being sincere. Nothing in the D-STAR equipment failed, and my post

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread n1tai
D-Star reliability! Or is it Operator / Equipment error? -Original Message- From: Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 1:26 am Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update On Jun 28, 2008

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-29 Thread Nate Duehr
On Jun 28, 2008, at 2:38 PM, KE5KAF wrote: > We have been listening and it sounds like the Dstar Field Day is > dead.. No activity... > > Where is everyone hanging out on Dstar?? > Our stack's (W0CDS) power supply was acting flakey and kicked its own breaker off (still investigating, but su

RE: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-28 Thread Woodrick, Ed
I'm linking to 2A after I send this message. From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KE5KAF Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 4:39 PM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update We have

Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-28 Thread KE5KAF
We have been listening and it sounds like the Dstar Field Day is dead.. No activity... Where is everyone hanging out on Dstar?? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
Ed, Thanks for the info on DStar FD. Sounds like a good test for EmComm and this is what FD is about. This has always been my primary function in taking part in FDs. I wish ARRL would be little more supportive of the new modes for they do have value in a disaster. I guess it takes those who

RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-27 Thread Woodrick, Ed
: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update Have not read the DStar FD rules, but do DV Dungle?, computer to repeater to user contacts count for points??? If testing for emergency comm would think so for this mode would be used in disaster just like Echolin

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
>Subject: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update > >This is really cool... FD on the internet >

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-27 Thread n1tai
This is really cool... FD on the internet -Original Message- From: txhemi57 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:56 am Subject: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update Is there an acceptable range of frequencies for simplex? [ED -