> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Dibbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 31 July 2001 3:21 PM
> To: e-gold Discussion
> Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: Proportion of HYIP scam to legitimate
> transactions
> Over 300 schemes offering guaranteed high-yi
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > >Can you list 300 legitimate merchants that accept e-gold?
> > I notice the thunderous silence in response to Julian Dibbel's
> > question of a few days ago!
>
> Here's a short list of e-gold accepting merchants...
Something that's missing from your list: reputation. A
> >Can you list 300 legitimate merchants that accept e-gold?
> I notice the thunderous silence in response to Julian Dibbel's
> question of a few days ago!
Here's a short list of e-gold accepting merchants...
PT Bookstore
http://www.ptbookstore.cx/
The Alchemycal Pages
http://www.alchemycalpag
>What I would challenge this list to do is give me some similarly
>suggestive numbers to the contrary. Don't just try to argue with the
>figures I've listed -- give me counterfigures that are even remotely as
>impressive. Has your online business accepted e-gold from 22,000 separate
>accounts? Or
> Can you list 300 legitimate merchants
> that accept e-gold?
I have about 250 listed in the Gold Directory database at
www.golddirectory.com. I kick all the HYIPs out of the database.
SnowDog
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank emai
>> Just for the record Ian, my PERSONAL estimate of the amount of
>> HYip/similar activity on e-gold is
>> "about half"
>> (That's what I told Julian on the fone, too! His stating that my
>> opinion is "90%" is just typical Wired journalistic innacuracy! ;) )
>
>I owe JP an apology and woul
> I just want to issue some further clarifications. And a challenge.
...
> Please help me see the rest of the picture.
Julian,
I appreciate what you propose and suggest that you broaden your
article's scope to include all the GBC's, rather than concentrating on
e-Gold alone.
This is admittedly
Julian,
> I am looking at what appears to be some very concrete evidence of
> robust HYIP activity in the e-gold world:
I doubt that anyone is going to deny the truth of that! Or that
other, more commercial, activity is very limited.
I do think, as I have argued, that there is convincing ev
I just want to issue some further clarifications. And a challenge.
First, I hope no one thinks that my observations about the prevalence of
HYIPs are meant to imply anything about the people on this list. I have
been almost wholly impressed with the ingenuity and honesty of the people
posting her
> Just for the record Ian, my PERSONAL estimate of the amount of
> HYip/similar activity on e-gold is
> "about half"
> (That's what I told Julian on the fone, too! His stating that my
> opinion is "90%" is just typical Wired journalistic innacuracy! ;) )
I owe JP an apology and would li
>If my disagreement prevents such a 'consensus' then so be it. How would
>either Claude or JP know the amount of business actually conducted by scams
>compared to legitimate business and personal transactions?
Just for the record Ian, my PERSONAL estimate of the amount of
HYip/similar activity
11 matches
Mail list logo
