nal Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Rafael Machado
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 1:32 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] UEFI App embedded on another uefi ap
On 12/18/2017 5:29 PM, fanwang2 wrote:
From: Wang Fan <fan.w...@intel.com>
Last check in involved a build error, this patch is to
fix this issue.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Wang Fan <fan
On 12/15/2017 7:45 PM, Rafael Machado wrote:
Hi Everyone.
I have a limited space problem at a project.
To solve this we had an idea, but would like to ask to you before expending
time on trying to do it, due to some tight schedule. (We know that the best
is to try before ask, but we do not have
On 12/14/2017 4:31 PM, Song, BinX wrote:
Keep library class header file definition independent
Cc: Eric Dong
Cc: Laszlo Ersek
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bell Song
---
On 12/14/2017 9:46 AM, Zeng, Star wrote:
Ruiyu,
Do you need to update Maintainers.txt accordingly at the same time?
Yes I will do that after the PerformancePkg is deleted.
Just would like to split the big changes into two steps:)
Thanks,
Star
On 12/13/2017 8:26 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
Turns out all .vfr files in the tree interacting with DynamicPcds
manually copy the same set of EFI_VARIABLE_* definitions, since the rest
of UefiMultiPhase.h is incompatible with VfrCompile.
Split these out into a separate header file
On 12/13/2017 4:44 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 12/13/17 03:35, Song, BinX wrote:
V2:
Update function name, add more detail description.
V1:
Check and assert invalid RegisterCpuFeature function parameter
Cc: Eric Dong
Cc: Laszlo Ersek
Contributed-under:
tializeFunc);
Feature = VA_ARG (Marker, UINT32);
+ ASSERT (RegisterCpuFeatureLibIsFeatureValid(Feature));
while (Feature != CPU_FEATURE_END) {
ASSERT ((Feature & (CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER))
!= (CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER));
Re
> -Original Message-
> From: Song, BinX
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 6:00 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: ler...@redhat.com; Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Check invalid
On 12/11/2017 4:16 PM, Song, BinX wrote:
Check and assert invalid RegisterCpuFeature function parameter
Cc: Eric Dong
Cc: Laszlo Ersek
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bell Song
---
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 2:54 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen@intel.com>;
> Ni, Rui
egister memory discovered
callback function!\n"));
CpuDeadLoop ();
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Ray
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
to just use a new macro
ACCESS_PAGE0_CODE(
);
to replace above methods to do the same job, which also makes code more
readability.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
(
);
to replace above methods to do the same job, which also makes code more
readability.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
S
(similar to DEBUG_CODE macro):
ACCESS_PAGE0_CODE(
);
Cc: Liming Gao <liming@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jia
to specify the size and alignment for page table pool. For IA32 processor
0x20 (2MB) is the only choice for both of them to meet the requirement of
page table pool.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Rui
On 12/6/2017 3:31 PM, Jian J Wang wrote:
Current implementation uses following two methods
EnableNullDetection()
DisableNullDetection()
to enable/disable page 0. These two methods will check PCD
PcdNullPointerDetectionPropertyMask to know if the page 0 is disabled or not.
This is due
On 12/6/2017 3:31 PM, Jian J Wang wrote:
Due to the introduction of NULL pointer detection feature, page 0 will be
disabled if the feature is enabled, which will cause legacy code failed to
update legacy data in page 0. This macro is introduced to make sure the
page 0 is enabled before those
tar
-Original Message-
From: Ni, Ruiyu
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 11:22 AM
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: leif.lindh...@linaro.org; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
<star.z...@intel.com>; Tian, Feng
Ard,
I should have provided some of them in the last version.
Sorry about that.
We just found an internal/private SdMmcPciHc implementation
developed by other teams. We are evaluating whether your
proposed SdMmcOverride can be used to retire that private
implementation.
On 12/6/2017 2:01 AM,
On 12/6/2017 2:01 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Many ARM based SoCs have integrated SDHCI controllers, and often,
these implementations deviate in subtle ways from the pertinent
specifications. On the one hand, these deviations are quite easy
to work around, but on the other hand, having a
On 12/5/2017 6:24 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5 December 2017 at 10:12, Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com> wrote:
Some comments re the detailed interfaces embedded in below.
On 11/30/2017 6:11 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Many ARM based SoCs have integrated SDHCI controllers, and
Some comments re the detailed interfaces embedded in below.
On 11/30/2017 6:11 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Many ARM based SoCs have integrated SDHCI controllers, and often,
these implementations deviate in subtle ways from the pertinent
specifications. On the one hand, these deviations are quite
On 12/5/2017 3:20 PM, Zeng, Star wrote:
If making this protocol a platform level singleton instance, is it so hard to
define the interfaces and parameters since different controllers may need
different hook points and parameters?
Thanks,
Star
-Original Message-
From: Ni, Ruiyu
Sent
On 11/30/2017 6:11 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Many ARM based SoCs have integrated SDHCI controllers, and often,
these implementations deviate in subtle ways from the pertinent
specifications. On the one hand, these deviations are quite easy
to work around, but on the other hand, having a
That's fine. Faster than me in the review response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsey, Jaben
> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 1:00 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] ShellPkg/ShellPkg
Kelly,
I pushed the commit, following your below recommendation.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Kelly
> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 1:18 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com&
I prefer to remove all deprecated items because I like clean:)
But then lots of customer complains may come.
So just provide my thoughts:
Deprecated items can be separated into:
1. Definitions: E.g.: UgaDraw protocol, DriverConfiguration2 protocol
Keep:
But harm the newbie developers
Ersek wrote:
> >> Ray,
> >>
> >> On 11/29/17 11:14, Ruiyu Ni wrote:
> >>> The TFTP command was converted from a NULL class library instance to
> >>> a dynamic shell command in commit 0961002352e9.
> >>>
> >>> Contributed-
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:54 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; Justen, Jordan L
> <jordan.l.
ro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:59 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH v3 3/6] ArmVirtPkg: Fix build failure due to Tftp
> library removal
>
> On 29 N
352e9. This patch complements commit
f9bc2f876326, which only removed the old library, but didn't add the new
dynamic command."
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:45 PM
> To: Ni, Rui
r...@redhat.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v3 3/6] ArmVirtPkg: Fix build failure due to Tftp
> library removal
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
>
iesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 3:57 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] BeagleBoardPkg: Fix build failure due to Tftp
> library removal
>
>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 6:02 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subjec
I just realized OVMF platform is referencing the INF.
I will search in all edkII code.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 3:35 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <
Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 10:10 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Bi, Dandan
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:51 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Leo Duran <leo.du...@amd.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: [pa
Maybe win10 does some optimization in S4 path.
Sent from a small-screen device
在 2017年11月24日,上午8:01,Paolo Bonzini
<pbonz...@redhat.com<mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com>> 写道:
On 23/11/2017 14:08, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/23/17 03:20, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
I cannot explain precisely why t
Sent from a small-screen device
在 2017年11月24日,上午1:19,Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>
写道:
On 11/23/17 15:58, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
Laszlo,
A S3 flag PCD was added to optimize boot flow. Let's say,
setting the flag to false is to remove some unnecessary c
Sent from a small-screen device
在 2017年11月24日,上午1:08,Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>
写道:
On 11/23/17 15:53, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
Comments below.
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 10:
the PciBus change, Microsoft gave
their Signed-off.
/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 9:08 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel-01 <
age-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 7:59 AM
> To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Justen, Jordan L
> <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ru
Thanks for the patch. It follows the idea described in:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-April/010294.html.
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, Novembe
I cannot explain precisely why the S4 resume fails.
I can just guess: Windows might have some assumptions on the BM bit.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 6:26 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
Laszlo,
Our QA found Win10 S4 resume fails due to your change.
As you might notice that I just rolled back the BM disabling patches in PciBus
module,
I am thinking about maybe you need to rollback the whole ExitBootServices
callback
as well to fix the compatibility issue.
Thanks/Ray
>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bi, Dandan
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 10:02 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: [patch] PcAtChipsetPkg/IsaAcpiDxe: Fix
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:41 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.car...@intel.com>
> Subjec
e MEDIA_CHANGED is not the only error that could happen.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 3:54 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Carsey, Jaben
> <jaben.car...@intel.com>; Ni,
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 9:16 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Justen, Jordan L
> <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Jeff Fan <vanjeff_...@hotmail.com>
> Cc: Kinney, M
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Jordan Justen
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 2:56 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel
side, and then use MtrrGetAllMtrrs()/MtrrSetAllMtrrs() to sync the
changes to
all other Aps.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Justen, Jordan L
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 9:54 AM
> To: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.
Thanks for the explanation.
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 12:29 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney, Michael
> D
Yes. 2 seconds is for some other terminal tools, that cannot do the F10
translation.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Heyi Guo [mailto:heyi@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:45 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.
No.
Even a terminal tool can recognize F10, it still needs to translate it into
"ESC [ V"
and send the three bytes to firmware.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Heyi Guo [mailto:heyi@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:31 PM
> To: Ni, Rui
inal).
So a 2 second timeout is added to wait additional keys.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 3:25 PM
> To: Heyi Guo <heyi@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; D
Mike,
I am a bit confused about mapping 0x18 to upper arrow.
I remembered that in old days, pressing ALT+18 in DOS window can generate upper
arrow.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael D Kinney
> Sent:
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Duran [mailto:leo.du...@amd.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 1:55 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Leo Duran <leo.du...@amd.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@in
Jian,
Can you add more comments to explain why changing the capabilities of GCD entry?
The background is clear by checking the Bugzilla. But it would be great to know
the issue
by just reading the code.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel
Laszlo,
Sure I will add the Bugzilla url in the commit message.
Steven,
Could you please check whether this patch can fix your "reconnect -r" hang?
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 7:23
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 1:11 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.car...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>;
platform enables IOMMU before and needs disable IOMMU after
> ExitBootService, the IOMMU should be disabled after PCI bus driver disables
> BME.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Michael Turner <michael.tur...@microsoft.com>
> Sign
2 comments below.
-Original Message-
From: Wang, Jian J
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 12:58 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.car...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Bi,
Dandan <dandan...@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] She
Jeff,
Thanks you for your comments!
How are you in Guiyang?
Thanks/Ray
From: Fan Jeff [mailto:vanjeff_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:43 AM
To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Mi
I will wait for Ard's feedback. It's an ARM specific module.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 6:07 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Heyi Guo <heyi@linaro.org>; linaro-
> u...@lists.linaro.org; e
gt;
> Another way is to propose adding StrniCmp() API into BaseLib.
>
> Thanks
> Liming
> >-Original Message-
> >From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> >Alcantara, Paulo
> >Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 2:51 AM
> >To: Cars
I also doubt such device driver exists.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:47 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Zeng,
> Star <star.z...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@
intel.com>;
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>;
Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg/VTdDxe: Change EBS Event TPL to
CALLBACK.
Good Info. I think a correct
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Gary Lin
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:53 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.c
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:20 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>;
> Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH v3 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/Pi
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
-Original Message-
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 3:59 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/CpuFeatures: Export HOB
Jeff,
I see. Thanks for mentioning that
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Do you mind to also give a r-b?
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Fan Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 201
---
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 3:23 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: [Patch 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Enhance waiting for AP
> initialization logic.
>
> Current logic always waiting for a s
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 3:23 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: [Patch 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib:
Dandan,
Thanks for fixing that.
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
-Original Message-
From: Bi, Dandan
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 9:00 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 4/4]
With the subject change suggested by Laszlo, Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni
<ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:08 PM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; edk2-dev
intel.com>; Carsey, Jaben
> <jaben.car...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-
> de...@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] ShellPkg/UefiShellLib: Use a more bright
> blue/green color
>
> And we always turn off the multiple colors. Tim
>
> -
Laszlo,
I agree with your status mapping.
It will make the implementation more clear and easier to maintain.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 8:12 PM
> To: Julien
Liming,
How many build failures are there if 4701 and 4703 are enabled for VS2017?
I am asking this because we sometimes met VS2008 build failures due to 4701 and
4703 are enabled for VS2008.
But the two warnings are disabled for VS2013 and later.
Can we have a consistent policy for the two
the setting from
HW/CPU,
Convert that setting to range array. Then dump the range array.
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo
Ersek
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:56 PM
To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.
Thanks Steven.
All,
I will check in this patch ASAP.
Because it's just a bug fix in a corner of implementation and it may cause all
system hang.
-Original Message-
From: Shi, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:04 AM
To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.
age-
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 11:03 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Update MTRR algorithm to calculate optimal
> settings
>
> Thanks.
>
> Would you mind to share to all of
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 6:04 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: [Patch] SourceLevelDebugPkg: Update SmmD
Please don't forget to change the structure name as proposed by Jiewen.
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 1:32 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <
name to X64_EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER
or
IA64_EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER. I am neutral using X64 or IA64, but don't want
to have EFI_ in the beginning.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:23 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu &
;
> Cc: Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Dong, Eric
> <eric.d...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLi
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsey, Jaben
> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:13 PM
> To: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>; Fu, Siyuan
> <siyuan...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
The "read"/"write" is from the Bus Master's point of view.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Daniil
> Egranov
> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:16 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: leif.lindh...@linaro.org;
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Eric
> Dong
> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:18 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@
t;; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Ni, Ruiyu
> <ruiyu...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] Ifconfig : Fixed False information about Media State.
>
> I agree with Jaben. If NetLibDetectMedia return error status, we can output as
> below:
>
> ShellPrintHiiEx (-1, -
If use both flags is same as --hash.
Can we just get rid of --hash and just use the existing two flags?
In this way, we can hide the internal implementation of how to check
modification.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On
degraded to MEM32 resource.
>
> The patch treat the resource paddings using the same logic as treating
> typical/actual resources and the total resource of a bridge is set to the MAX
> of
> typical/actual resources and resource paddings.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribut
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
-Original Message-
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:27 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm:
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
-Original Message-
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 8:27 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v2 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuD
Yes I think so.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsey, Jaben
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 2:30 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] ShellPkg/dh: Correct typo in help
>
> Ray,
>
>
RegisterTableCount
);
2. How about change MPRendezvousProcedure to InitializeAp?
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 5:31 PM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 4:33 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Carsey,
> Jabe
sday, September 28, 2017 2:13 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext" until
> boot
This could avoid the "BootNext" set by PlatformBootManagerLib be consumed in
*this* boot.
If I add "*" around "this", is it more clear?
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:00 PM
> To: Ni, Ru
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu...@intel.com>
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Bi, Dandan
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 10:45 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Carsey, Jaben <jaben.car...@intel.com>
>
401 - 500 of 1080 matches
Mail list logo