Sorry, pressed send too soon...
On 14 July 2015 at 16:38, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
>
> On 14 July 2015 at 11:12, Olivier Martin wrote:
>
>> When PcdBdsLinuxSupport is enabled, users can create boot
>> entries for the legacy EFI Linux loader.
>>
>> The ARM BDS
On 14 July 2015 at 11:12, Olivier Martin wrote:
> When PcdBdsLinuxSupport is enabled, users can create boot
> entries for the legacy EFI Linux loader.
>
> The ARM BDS detects if the image is a EFI image if not
> then it assumes it is a legacy Linux kernel (a kernel
> without EFI Stub).
> If the B
On 13 July 2015 at 17:36, Olivier Martin wrote:
> When PcdBdsLinuxSupport is enabled, users can create boot
> entries for the legacy EFI Linux loader if it exists into
> the firmware.
>
Surely this is only true if the kernel doesn't have an EFI header? If it
has an EFI header, it will be forced
Hi Laszlo,
On 8 July 2015 at 10:46, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 07/08/15 04:46, Heyi Guo wrote:
> > Hi Roy,
> >
> > I have one question; please see my comments below.
>
> Indeed:
>
> >
> > On 07/08/2015 08:44 AM, Roy Franz wrote:
> >> From: Laszlo Ersek
> >>
> >> Add a fixed pointer PCD to allow b
Thanks for updating, but perhaps I am reading the wrong thing. I don't see
a commit message in any of the v2 patches describing what you are doing,
like in your previous message on this thread.
Also, you've added "CC: " to the commit message, but you haven't
actually CC'd the maintainers in quest
On 7 July 2015 at 13:48, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 7 July 2015 at 14:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 7 July 2015 at 03:27, jiaxinwu wrote:
> >> Those patches are used to remove Ip4ConfigDxe module and related guid
> definitions from related packages.
> >>
> >
> > Could you please explain *why
Hi Ard,
On 7 July 2015 at 13:22, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 20:26, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > This fixes an issue reported by Ryan Harkin where 32-bit ARM platforms
> without
> > PSCI compliant firmware cannot be rebooted or powered off successfully at
> >
On 6 July 2015 at 17:32, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 18:11, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> > The following 3 patches break reboot/shutdown from within UEFI on TC2 and
> > probably all 32-bit ARM Ltd platforms:
> >
> > ee171cc 2015-05-08 ArmVExpressPkg: restrict
The following 3 patches break reboot/shutdown from within UEFI on TC2 and
probably all 32-bit ARM Ltd platforms:
ee171cc 2015-05-08 ArmVExpressPkg: restrict ArmVExpressSysConfigLib to
SEC and DXE_DRIVER [Ard Biesheuvel]
c889bf2 2015-05-08 ArmVExpressPkg: avoid the use of
ArmVExpressSysConf
> --- trunk/edk2/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec 2015-02-25 19:15:39 UTC
> (rev 16932)
> +++ trunk/edk2/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec 2015-02-25 19:20:57 UTC
> (rev 16933)
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>## FDT Configuration Table
># Include/Guid/Fdt.h
>gFdtTableGuid = {
[+Olivier at his proper email address]
[+ linaro-uefi mailing list]
On 18 June 2015 at 18:46, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> TC2 no longer boots for me with this patch. If I revert it, it instead
> crashes like this:
>
> add-symbol-file
> /linaro/working/edk2.git/Build/ArmVExpress-CTA15
TC2 no longer boots for me with this patch. If I revert it, it instead
crashes like this:
add-symbol-file
/linaro/working/edk2.git/Build/ArmVExpress-CTA15-A7/DEBUG_GCC49/ARM/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/FdtPlatformDxe/FdtPlatformDxe/DEBUG/FdtPlatformDxe.dll
0xBA835240
Loading driver at 0x000BA835000 Entry
OK, so it seems Ard beat me to it and posted a patch already.
On 14 May 2015 at 10:58, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> This patch removes the unused DevicePathSize variable.
>
> The following commit introduces the DevicePathSize variable in function
> GetStringIdFromDatabase:
>
&
le]
UINTN DevicePathSize;
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
MdeModulePkg/Universal/HiiDatabaseDxe/ConfigKeywordHandler.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/HiiDatabaseDxe/ConfigKeywordHandler.c
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/HiiDatabaseDxe/ConfigKeywordHan
On 27 January 2015 at 10:56, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:36:23AM -, Olivier Martin wrote:
> > Any reason to make the Network stack conditional?
> > One reason to make the SMSC Lan91x Ethernet controller condition on some
> > RTSM models is to use the virtio network drive
Many thanks, Andrew. That looks very promising. I'll try it out next week.
On 9 Jan 2015 17:21, "Andrew Fish" wrote:
>
> > On Jan 9, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> >
> > I can't find a TFTP command in the shell on my ARM64 Juno platform.
&g
I can't find a TFTP command in the shell on my ARM64 Juno platform.
Did I miss something? (I think not)
Considering TFTP is already supported via the ARM BDS menus, I'm thinking
that a command can't be that hard to implement. Although maybe I'm being
overly optimistic here!
Google shows that m
OK, so it seems I was just a bit too quick off the mark, for
Olivier/Brendan have just fixed it in revision 15527:
http://sourceforge.net/p/edk2/code/15527
It hasn't hit the git mirror just yet, but I hacked it by hand and it works.
Thanks to you all!
On 14 May 2014 17:36, Ryan Harkin
Thanks for the pointers! Very valuable.
On 14 May 2014 17:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 05/14/14 18:25, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 05/14/14 16:57, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> >> I have a platform set up to boot using PXE and I'm getting the following
> >> error:
> &
I have a platform set up to boot using PXE and I'm getting the following
error:
PXE-E05: Download buffer is smaller than requested file.
I'm using an Ubuntu tftpd-hpa server, so it supports the tsize option. The
file I'm downloading is quite large at approx 8MB. I'm using an aarch64 /
arm64
I always build a single UEFI binary for Foundation and FVP Base models by
defining ARM_FOUNDATION_FVP, so I guess I am now going to have problems
when I run on an AEMv8 4+4 model?
What would setting cores to 8 and clusters to 2 do to the Foundation
model? Would it work OK?
On 3 April 2014 21:04
On 12 March 2014 17:26, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Thanks Ryan for the contribution.
> I tested your patch and it seems doing the right things :-)
> I pushed your change into SVN 15325.
>
Excellent. Thank you :-)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: R
Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c |8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c b/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c
index 3142d85..7f0ef42 100644
--- a/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c
+++ b
Hi Olivier,
Here's the patch we discussed to stop the use inputting more characters than
allowed. It also reverts the Boolean input back to 2 chars, as suggested in
our email thread.
Regards,
Ryan.
--
Flow-based real
ways busy, but
I'll be able to squeeze it in tomorrow/Wed.)
> I will test your patch and merge it afterward.
>
Thanks!
> Thanks,
> Olivier
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
> > Sent: 17 February 2014 19
On 21 February 2014 18:44, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 02/21/14 16:12, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I've just noticed that the upstream EDK2 repository for the FVP AEMv8
> model is broken when bui
Hi Olivier,
I've just noticed that the upstream EDK2 repository for the FVP AEMv8
model is broken when built with Linaro GCC 13.12 onwards.
The error I see is:
UEFI firmware (version built at 14:54:24 on Feb 21 2014)
add-symbol-file
/linaro/uefi/master/upstream/edk2.git/Build/ArmVExpress-FVP-AA
On 12 February 2014 15:09, wrote:
> Revision: 15236
> http://sourceforge.net/p/edk2/code/15236
> Author: oliviermartin
> Date: 2014-02-12 15:09:58 + (Wed, 12 Feb 2014)
> Log Message:
> ---
> ArmPlatformPkg/BdsLib: Let the user press enter when inputting booleans
>
> Co
On 15 January 2014 16:03, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I forgot to mention you but I pushed your patches in SVN earlier today.
>
Ah-ha! Thanks Olivier, yes, I see them in the commit log now :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Olivier
>
> > -Original Mess
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A9x4.dsc | 11 +++
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A9x4.fdf |8 +++-
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A9x4.dsc
b
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.dsc| 10 ++
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.fdf|6 ++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.dsc
b/ArmPlatformPkg
Hi Steven,
In the following emails are the three patches that I'd like applied to the
Linaro EDK2 tree for the 14.01 release:
[PATCH 1/3] ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg: add virtio to RTSM A15
[PATCH 2/3] ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg: add virtio to RTSM A15
[PATCH 3/3] ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpress
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.dsc | 10 ++
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.fdf |6 ++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.dsc
b/ArmPlatformPkg
I just wanted to confirm that this works in the 13.12 release and in my own
builds from the latest tree.
Thanks Roy!
On 12 December 2013 22:08, Roy Franz wrote:
> Change the addresses/sizes of the variable storage areas to use 256k
> blocks so UEFI is compatible with both the RTSM models and Q
Hi Roy,
This patch is in 2013.12-rc1 now and I am no longer able to save my
config in the models. Can you confirm if it works for you and what
setup you are testing?
I see this on each boot:
Loading driver at 0x000BF54D000 EntryPoint=0x000BF54D26D ArmVeNorFlashDxe.efi
ValidateFvHeader: No Firmw
reference flash images in your CI (using the parameter
> motherboard.flashloader1.fname="flash.dat”). Doing that you will not need
> to create new boot entries everytime you want to test a new UEFI image.
>
That's a nice idea. Unfortunately, it doesn't fix the problem when r
that LEG provide something to *replace* ARM/BDS, not something that uses
it.
So I guess my patch is only relevant for those who use ARM/BDS.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 19 November 2
On 19 November 2013 10:34, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:30:25AM +0000, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> > Hi Olivier/Steve/Leif/whoever is interested,
> >
> > I have a problem I'm trying to solve and I don't think there is a proper
&
e fine with me too.
Opinions on a way forward and/or this patch?
Regards,
Ryan.
note: the patch looks a little larger than it should because I had to
indent the section beginning with the comment "// Check if the initrd is a
uInitrd", although that section is unmodified otherwise.
>F
On 9 October 2013 16:31, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> I would like to revive discussion on this patch. It seems it has not been
> accepted, perhaps we could have a comment here from the maintainer about
> what is happening?
>
I think waiting a week is long enough to not make me seem imp
I would like to revive discussion on this patch. It seems it has not been
accepted, perhaps we could have a comment here from the maintainer about
what is happening?
On 19 July 2013 20:11, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Thanks Ting for the feedback,
> what about this new version (see attached patch)
e LAN91x driver to the
> multi-core A15 RTSM build
> ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg: Add the LAN91x driver to the
> single-core A15 RTSM build
> ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg: Add the LAN91x driver to the A9 RTSM
> build
> ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg: Add the LAN91
I would like to revive discussion on this patch. It seems it has not been
accepted, perhaps we could have a comment here from the maintainer about
what is happening?
On 19 July 2013 20:05, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Sorry, I sent the old patch. Here is the new one.
> _
On 9 October 2013 02:53, Fu, Siyuan wrote:
> Hi, Pollack
>
> I don't agree with the opinion that the Snp.Mode can't be accessed before
> Snp->Initialize() is called. According to UEFI spec, all the fields in
> Snp.Mode structure must be discovered during driver initialization, per my
> understand
On 8 October 2013 09:51, Fu, Siyuan wrote:
> Hi, Pollack and Martin
>
> Here calling Snp->GetStatus() without state code check is intend to update
> the MediaPresent field of EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_MODE to reflect the latest
> media status. Even though this call meet some errors we still need to
> re
This is exactly my use-case for wanting to change FreePool() to allow it to
take a NULL pointer without throwing an ASSERT. Just saying...
On 19 September 2013 18:21, Carsey, Jaben wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey
>
> I will commit this.
>
> -Jaben
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ser
On 19 September 2013 12:30, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 09/17/13 18:54, Olivier Martin wrote:
>
> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/VirtioNet.h | 13 +-
>
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/VirtioNet.h
> b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/VirtioNet.h
> > index 9f5291a..6bcb57
On 17 September 2013 16:52, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2013, at 11:36 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Tracking down a crash I am seeing shows that I am effectively calling
> FreePool() with a NULL pointer. The system then ASSERTS and hangs.
>
> I've n
Hi,
Tracking down a crash I am seeing shows that I am effectively calling
FreePool() with a NULL pointer. The system then ASSERTS and hangs.
I've noticed various seemingly "random" asserts like this before and
suspect it may be related. Of course, the assert output never helps track
down the cu
On 27 July 2013 21:50, Grant Likely wrote:
> [cc'ing ryan; he already has to deal with keeping multiple platforms
> in sync with mainline]
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
>>
>> > Grant did some investigation a while ag
On 24 June 2013 11:44, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 10:08, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> On 24 June 2013 08:44, Dong, Eric wrote:
>>> This change is not correct, the "Buffer" variable is not defined.
>>
>> Hmmm, isn't that curious! I've not
I think look into this one properly!
Thanks Eric.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 3:48 PM
> To: ryan.har...@linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> patc...@linaro.org; boot-architec
On 21 June 2013 17:12, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
>> On 21 June 2013 11:15, Olivier Martin wrote:
>>> I am not convinced by this patch.
>>> The use case you gave is the automated build system. Nothing prevent you t
you want to change the OUTPUT_DIRECTORY, you should update
the build script to allow you to over-ride the value in the DSC file
;-)
(I'll hide now :-))
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 21
ll look into the build script if I get some time. Meanwhile, this
patch can live in my tree.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 21 June 2013 09:05
>> To: ryan.har...@linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.n
On 21 June 2013 11:02, Olivier Martin wrote:
> I committed this change after fixing the coding style (revision 14437).
Yes, your revised version is more appropriate. Thanks.
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
>> Sent:
aps I should just
drop this one?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 21 June 2013 09:05
>> To: ryan.har...@linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
>> patc...@linaro.org; boot-architect...@lists.linaro.org
t aware of
this and I've been carrying this patch, thinking I still needed it.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: boot-architecture-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:boot-
>> architecture-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Harkin
>> Sent: 21 June 2013 08:
On 21 June 2013 09:05, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> Linaro have been carrying a few small patches in our tree for some months
> now; they have proven valuable and stable, so we'd like to push them
> upstream.
>
> The first few patches configure the platforms with some simple defau
This patch is needed to fixup some builds, such as Versatile Express A5,
otherwise they hang on boot due to the first instruction being zero.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
BaseTools/Source/C/GenFv/GenFv.c|7 +---
BaseTools/Source/C/GenFv/GenFvInternalLib.c | 48
From: Leif Lindholm
This patch fixes a minor error that prevents the native ARM compiler
from building the code.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
---
.../Universal/SetupBrowserDxe/Expression.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Set
\
-D EDK2_OUT_DIR=Build/vea9
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-CTA15-A7.dsc|4
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-CTA9x4.dsc |4 ++--
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.dsc|4
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM
The original BSP for TC2 hard codes EDK2_SKIP_PEICORE=1, but this change
allows the user to over-ride the value at build time.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-CTA15-A7.dsc|2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg
Add Reboot and Shutdown options to the main BDS menu so that users can
control the platform remotely without having to physically reboot/shutdown
the board.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BootMenu.c | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a
From: Leif Lindholm
Currently, only ".efi" files are recognized as valid ARM UEFI
applications by BDS. This patch also makes ".EFI" files recognised.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/Bds
This patch changes the Versatile Express A9 BSP to build with
EDK2_ARMVE_STANDALONE=1 as the default option.
The user may then specify zero if they wish to build the non-standalone
version.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-CTA9x4.dsc |3 +++
1 file
Previously, there was no way to read the global FDT config.
This patch displays the global FDT config after the boot devices in the main
menu.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BootMenu.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a
compatibility, I've left the numbering support in.
However, I've re-ordered the Ebl and Boot Manager entries, so the default
number for the Boot Manager option is now 2, not 3.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BootMenu.c | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insert
Linaro have been carrying a few small patches in our tree for some months
now; they have proven valuable and stable, so we'd like to push them
upstream.
The first few patches configure the platforms with some simple default
values and some extra build options.
[PATCH 1/9] ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpre
sting configs stored on the board due
to the change in structure sizes to store the boot device configurations.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec |2 +
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/Bds.c | 30 +++-
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/Bds.inf |
LibResetSystem was performing a cold reboot for both reboot and
shutdown.
This patch updates LibResetSystem to pass SYS_CFG_SHUTDOWN to the
microcontroller when called wit EfiResetShutdown.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin
---
.../Library/ResetSystemLib/ResetSystemLib.c|9 -
1
On 18 June 2013 00:21, Jordan Justen wrote:
> As part of the recent forced sourceforge project 'upgrades' the url of
> the EDK II git mirror has changed:
> http://sf.net/p/tianocore/edk2 (web)
> http://git.code.sf.net/p/tianocore/edk2 (git)
> git://git.code.sf.net/p/tianocore/edk2
>
> The EDK II F
On 7 June 2013 06:33, Keshav Padram wrote:
> On 7 June 2013 04:27, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> > I will send out notices when the EDK, EDK II and EDK II Buildtools
>> > projects are migrated. For other projects, please refer to the wiki
>>
On 22 May 2013 18:28, Richardson, Brian wrote:
> I could you give you better guidance if I knew what type of UEFI code you
> were trying to debug (UEFI driver? OS loader? UEFI app? Firmware/BIOS?).
>
And the architecture you're using. I could assume it's x86 and stay
out of it ;-)
But if you'r
On 28 February 2013 22:36, ap at wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am a newbie in ARM world and trying to learn the basics. I am very much
> familiar with UEFI-EDKII on x86 side and now interested in learning this new
> architecture & design. I have downloaded the code from sourceforge.net; but
> what’s next;
On 22 February 2013 11:14, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 18:17 -0800, Cameron Esfahani wrote:
>> Oh, I'm serious.
>>
>> Don't take my dislike of git to mean that I don't think we should
>> consider the proposal to migrate edk2 away from svn to git. If the
>> consensus is to switc
ust expand the memory size to
> the PE image size for TE image. Attach my patch; please help to verify this
> patch.
>
Your patch also resolved my issue. Again, I haven't tried to
understand the code, but I tested that it works, so you can have my
tag for what it's worth:
Tested-
> At the least the code in RED must be removed. But some additional code might
> be needed to fix the alignment of the code section and the image size
> calculation to take in account this alignment.
>
> But these fixes would go into MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib.
>
>
>
>
Great discussion :-)
On 12 February 2013 11:11, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2013 Jordan Justen wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Olivier Martin
>> wrote:
>> > Linaro maintains their own git-svn service:
>> > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=mirror/edk2/edk2.git;a=summary
>>
>> Andrew
On 11 February 2013 16:41, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> On 11 February 2013 16:08, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>> The attached patch changes the PandaBoardPkg/build.sh script RELEASE
>>> or DEBUG parameter handling.
>>
On 11 February 2013 16:08, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> The attached patch changes the PandaBoardPkg/build.sh script RELEASE
>> or DEBUG parameter handling.
>>
>> Before this patch, build.sh can be called thus:
>>
The attached patch changes the PandaBoardPkg/build.sh script RELEASE
or DEBUG parameter handling.
Before this patch, build.sh can be called thus:
./build.sh
./build.sh -b DEBUG
./build.sh RELEASE
This patch simplifies the way you pass the debug/release parameter
into build.sh so that build
Hi Keeran,
I wish I'd seen this email earlier, I suspect you have either got it
working or you've given up by now!
On 20 December 2012 09:44, keeran k wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am trying to get my hands on ARM-UEFI on Pandaboard 4430. I just followed
> the instructions given in readme.txt below link;
Olivier,
Nicola is referring to the A15-TC1 BSP that's in my tree, not to the
RTSM version...
Nicola,
On 22 October 2012 10:58, Nicola Johnsen wrote:
> So just that I understand this correctly: if there is no TZ controller on
> the board, then secure memory is just emulated?
As far as I could
84 matches
Mail list logo
