I have a macro which, while configuring my K3S for FT8 operation, sets BW
to 4.0 kHz.the 6.0 kHz roofing filter is (apparently) automatically
selected and I do not actually realize 4-ish kHz BW until I manually select
the 13 kHz roofing filter.
It seems from the Programmer's reference that the
Don,
I think there may have been a software utility in the past which allowed
you to do something like you were trying, but I may be thinking of the
KRC2 utility instead.
I am glad to hear that you are working OK now.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 10/19/2017 8:38 PM, Don Putnick wrote:
Thanks, Don. No,
Thanks, Don. No, you didn't misunderstand my question. I was trying to
select the antenna first, then select one or more bands second, which
doesn't work. Your way was to do it the other way around; select the band
first, then select one or more antennas second, which does work. All better.
Thanks
Don,
There is no selection of a "group of bands" - but you can select the
proper antenna for any one band. Once you have done that, change bands
and select the desired antenna for that band. When you have covered all
bands of interest and selected the antennas for each, is the proper
antenn
I can't seem to select one group of bands for one antenna and a different
group of bands for another. All that seems to work for me is either one
band or all bands. Suggestions please.
Thanks and 73,
Don NA6Z
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home
From: Ross Primrose [mailto:n...@n4rp.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 5:13 PM
To: Wayne Burdick; N2TK, Tony
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Question on KXV3B
I think you two might be talking across purposes. I got the impression Tony
meant the external 6 or 6/10m preamp...
hes slowly as a reminder.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
> Tnx
> N2TK, Tony
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Eric
> Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:12 PM
> To: Jim Lowman; elecraft@mailman.
So, I assume that those of us who own the external preamp, don't need
this new board?
73 de Jim - AD6CW
On 5/21/2015 7:42 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
The addition of the low-noise amplifier for 12-6 meters is the only change. The
module is compatible with either the K3 or K3S. The manual will be
On Mon,9/15/2014 7:07 PM, James Bennett wrote:
What is the real benefit to switching to AFSK-A mode for RTTY? Is that what
everyone is using, or is DATA-A just as good?
Hi Jim,
I read other folks responses without seeing your original post. Sorry
about that. To use AFSK, you need a single d
On Mon,9/15/2014 8:46 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Yes, the AFSK A data submode is optimized for RTTY operation. The
default sideband is LSB and the use of the dual filter is possible.
Furthermore, the K3 dial display shows the mark frequency.
If you are using an RTTY mode with an application such as
Jim, and all,
Yes, the AFSK A data submode is optimized for RTTY operation. The
default sideband is LSB and the use of the dual filter is possible.
Furthermore, the K3 dial display shows the mark frequency.
If you are using an RTTY mode with an application such as MMTTY, you
will find the AFS
I find myself switching between Data A and AFSK-A quite a bit.
The RTTY dual passband DSP filter (DUAL PB) can help a lot with
QRM from nearby RTTY signals, and it eliminates much of the
off-frequency noise. You can also turn on TEXT DEC to get the K3
to decode the RTTY, giving you another chan
I've been a PSK31 user just about ever since the mode came to be. Not a heavy
user, but couple time a month I get on and have some nice keyboard QSO's. In
the 50 years that I've been licensed, I have NEVER made a RTTY QSO! However, it
does intrigue me so I started messing with it a little this w
It's been quite a few years since I used MixW, but here goes:
1. Last time I tried it, MixW did not understand the K3's digital
sub-modes. Basically it acted as if they were all the same (either FSK D
or AFSK A), i.e. on LSB. Even when I put the rig in DATA A, MixW still
acted as though the ra
looks like the mixw pdf help file(s)
MixW 2.19 Help File by Scott Hill, K6IX
http://k6ix.net/MixW.html
is more complete than the one found in the actual mixw 2.20 pgm
On 7/16/2014 1:57 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
*I don't use MixW* but it sounds like MixW is in the wrong sideband.
73,
..
Hi Joe,
I was thinking that as well, but MixW is using USB. As a test I
reversed the sideband by pressing the mode until I saw REV pop up. I
would have expected that to correct the issue if the software were on
the wrong sideband, but it just makes it fail the opposite
direction...
My belief t
*I don't use MixW* but it sounds like MixW is in the wrong sideband.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2014-07-16 10:54 AM, David Cole wrote:
Joe,
Is there something else that might explain the actions of the signal in
the waterfall of MixW?
I have tried DATA A in REV sideband, (I thought that would
Joe,
Is there something else that might explain the actions of the signal in
the waterfall of MixW?
I have tried DATA A in REV sideband, (I thought that would fix the
issue), and the signal does not stay pinned to the same frequency under
the MixW calibration marks... As I tune up, MixW moves t
David,
AFSK A is optimized for use with RTTY. It defaults to LSB and the
frequency displayed is the frequency of the Mark tone. The latter
feature does not make too much sense to me when using a waterfall
display, but it makes a lot of sense when using narrow filters and
tuning to a RTTY st
In simple terms:
AFSK A is LSB, AFSK TX filter (MENU: AFSK TX) is available and
controlled by PITCH (Mark), audio input uses data selection.
TX and RX EQ are disabled. Receive dual tone (dual peak) filter
is available. Frequency (VFO) display reflects *MARK*
DATA A is USB, AFSK TX filter is n
Hi all,
What EXACTLY is the difference between "AFSK A", and "DATA A".
Here is why I ask:
In AFSK A Mode:
While using MixW, and looking at the MixW screen, and in USB on the K3,
as I tune using the knob, the MixW screen shows the signal stuck to a
frequency on the top calibration marks on MixW
Hi All,
Last fall I replaced the PA connectors in my K3
with the Elecraft gold plated pin connectors that
they recommend.
Recently I have also acquired the gold replacement
28 and 5 pin connectors for the front panel of my
early K3.
But I have misplaced the PDF instructions that
Elecraft
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Barry wrote:
> From what I see on the Elecraft web site, the Remoterig modem uses a serial
> connection with a K3.
>
> If you have the K3 hooked up to a P3 and/or computer for home station use,
> do you use a serial A/B switch or some other method to switch it to u
>From what I see on the Elecraft web site, the Remoterig modem uses a serial
connection with a K3.
If you have the K3 hooked up to a P3 and/or computer for home station use,
do you use a serial A/B switch or some other method to switch it to use as a
remote station terminal? Be interested in hear
John,
I think you mean it goes from 60M to 30M without stopping at 40. If that's
what you meant to type, then I bet the config menu item BND MAP has 40
inadvertently included.
73, Jim N7US
-Original Message-
I'm planning on running the Minnesota QSO party with one of my K3s in the
My question is that I would like to be able to simultaneously decode
more than 2.8KHz (HRD is limited to 3.9KHz) of the ham band at once.
I have thought about fitting the 6KHz AM filter (there not being a
4KHz filter available). One part of me says that would work just
fine and the other part of
Happy Xmas guys and a healthy and prosperous New Year to all.
I am
a recent convert to the K3 with model 6990.
I am primarily a data mode operator (PSK31 etc. etc.) and my
K3 has the 2.8KHz and 250Hz 8 pole filters fitted and let me say its doing a
very fine job too. I use HRD version 5 which ap
Rob,
Too many variables to give a good answer.
Consider that the K3 plus Alpha 87A might be giving you RF Feedback
which will create"strange happenings". The real question is -- "Does
the same thing happen when driving a dummy load?" If the answer is
"NO", then look for the solution in your
I noticed the other night that when I was using one of my two K3s on 80 m
CW, in full QSK, there would be occasional snap-like audio sounds and I
would lose sidetone during a computer-keyed interval. The radio was still
putting out a signal but the sidetone and between-character RX signals
were mut
Thanks to many who continued my education on HF operating. Wonderful Hobby,
this.
Monty K2DLJ
> On 2/29/2012 4:51 AM, Monty Shultes wrote:
>> Of course I don't understand why you would receive better on one antenna and
>> transmit better on another.
>>
>>
> __
There is a very simple answer for that. All you care about for receive
is signal-to-noise ratio on YOUR end of the path... efficiency is
irrelevant because there is usually plenty of gain in any modern
receiver, and if there isn't enough gain a simple low noise preamp fills
in nicely. That m
> Of course I don't understand why you would receive better on one
> antenna and transmit better on another.
Simple ... quite often my vertical is very noisy on receive and I
can hear much better on my 80/40 trap inverted V on the bands the
vertical covers. However, I still need to transmit on
John,
Cannot do that, but if you have the KXV3 installed, you can use the RX
antenna input.
There is benefit in that approach - you cannot transmit into your
receive antenna and its preamps are safe.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 2/29/2012 1:34 AM, WB9JPH wrote:
> How do I set up my single receiver K3 to
Write a macro in whatever rig control program you use to simulate pushing the
ANT button when you transition from RX-TX-RX. Of course I don't understand why
you would receive better on one antenna and transmit better on another.
On Feb 29, 2012, at 1:34 AM, WB9JPH wrote:
> How do I set up my
Of Kjeld Holm
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 8:48 p.m.
> To: 'WB9JPH'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 question
>
> Hi John,
>
>
>
> To the best of my knowledge this is not possible.
>
>
>
> I wish somebody will pr
2012 07:34
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 question
How do I set up my single receiver K3 to transmit on ANT 1 and Rx on ANT 2?
73
John
WB9JPH
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: <http://mailman.qth.
How do I set up my single receiver K3 to transmit on ANT 1 and Rx on ANT 2?
73
John
WB9JPH
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mail
VE3MV:
> As I understand it, (at a high level) with Diversity turned on,
both the MainRx
and SubRx are turned on, use the same bandwidth roofing filters and the main
VFO A provides the same LO signal for both receivers resulting in audio from
the MainRx going to the left ear and the SubRx audio
GA: Perhaps someone (Wayne or Lyle or ??) could provide some further
explanation about how the APF is implemented when Diversity RX is turned on.
As I understand it, (at a high level) with Diversity turned on, both the MainRx
and SubRx are turned on, use the same bandwidth roofing filters and
I put a macro in M4 that switches to 53 watts PC053; Another in M1 to go back
to 100
watts. PC100;
73, Mike NF4L
On 12/10/2010 4:45 PM, bill wade, sr. wrote:
> I have a K3 100 watt transceiver. The amp is a SG500. I use the "power
> set per band " from the config menu to store drive settings
>
I have a K3 100 watt transceiver. The amp is a SG500. I use the "power
set per band " from the config menu to store drive settings
independently for each band.
Is there any way to set up the K3 so that one can switch on the fly from
barefoot operation to the amp without going through the necess
Hi Gary,
Just a little more feedback. For the fun of it I tried manual tuning
through the bands @ 50 watts and found that the tuning power on 40 meters
through 10 meters did not fluctuate using the XMIT/Tune button. All other
bands
did.
Thanks,
73,
Paul AD5SX
__
Hello,
I am chasing down a noise source that I hear when transmitting voice and data
modes on my K3. I trying some experiments to nail down the source, but while
doing so I need to leave the K3 on transmit for a (relatively) extended period
so I can hear any changes in the characteristics
> If the above is the case, does the LPF affect ALL audio outputs?
>
> Will Elecraft or someone clarify this?
The LPF affects PHONES (fropnt and rear) and SPEAKER only. It does not affect
LINE OUT.
The component value changes improve headphone out (front and rear) low
frequency response by ch
>Has it improved fidelity? Reduced noise? ...Speaker or headphones?
...Line Out?
I ask as seemingly on the reflector I picked up that (LPF asisde?)
improvements to the DSP board audio affected the Headphone output. The
improvements to Speaker and Line Out were those made on the main board.
If
I've noted several recent postings from those that have upgraded their DSP
board (which I assume included the LP filter board). Each has said that the
new board sounds great. I wonder if those folks could be a bit more specific
in order to help those of us on the fence. Has it improved CW or SSB
Grant, on an earlier thread on this general topic Wayne said that
SMTR OF and SC may need further tweaking when switching to Abs
after first aligning in Nor mode with Pre on. My experience mimics yours.
With a 50uv signal and the S meter at S9, Nor OF setting is 30 and Abs
setting is at 23.
Grant,
Mine does the same thing as yours - it appears as though the S-meter
'abs' setting is the same as S-meter 'nor' with the preamp OFF. So what
I did was calibrate the S-meter with the preamp OFF and then set it to
'abs'.
Makes sense to me, after all S-9 is supposed to be a 50 uV signal at
> So, the S-Meter calibration instructions in the manual indicate that
> PRE should be on. When calibration is done, that means that a 50uV
> signal reads S-9 with PRE on .. but about S-7 with PRE off. And then
> if the mode is changed from Normal to Absolute, a 50uV signal reads
> S-7 w
So, the S-Meter calibration instructions in the manual indicate that
PRE should be on. When calibration is done, that means that a 50uV
signal reads S-9 with PRE on .. but about S-7 with PRE off. And then
if the mode is changed from Normal to Absolute, a 50uV signal reads
S-7 with or wit
> The manual indicates than when ESSB is turned on, the TX EQ menu
> function becomes TX* EQ (or something along those lines). I don't see
> that happening.
The errata sheet should indicate this feature is not yet implemented.
73,
Lyle KK7P
__
The manual indicates than when ESSB is turned on, the TX EQ menu
function becomes TX* EQ (or something along those lines). I don't see
that happening.
Did I miss something, or is this one of those features still to be
implemented?
Thanks ... Grant/NQ5T
_
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there is a K3 serial port command to set the
monitor level? I am using my K3 remotely and inadvertently set the CW
monitor level to 0 before I left my station today (it is 80 miles
away). I have not seen a way to control this via TRX-Manager or Ham
Radio Deluxe. I lo
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Steve Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting pretty close to the time I'm expecting to see a Katiegram, and
> I'm thinking about adding either the TCXO or the 6KHz filter to my order.
>
> I do a lot of PSK-31 and I'm wondering if most folks find the stock
>
Greetings all,
I'm getting pretty close to the time I'm expecting to see a Katiegram,
and I'm thinking about adding either the TCXO or the 6KHz filter to my
order.
I do a lot of PSK-31 and I'm wondering if most folks find the stock
oscillator sufficiently stable for digital or if the TCXO is
Whoa... Simon's sounding like an Aussie fan!! :)
Bruce, NM5B
Santa Fe, NM
===
> You'd best get in training for the next world cup then :-)
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter ZL1PWD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> That's a bit low Simon!!
>
You'd best get in training for the next world cup then :-)
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: "Peter ZL1PWD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's a bit low Simon!!
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be
That's a bit low Simon!!
Cheers for now
Peter ZL1PWD
K3#139
It sure is a great radio
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Brown (HB9DRV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter ZL1PWD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:28 P
gt;
To: "Peter ZL1PWD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 question
- Original Message -
From: "Peter ZL1PWD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can confirm the k3 cabinet color is "All Black" as in the Ne
Personally, I prefer black, it was yet another tick on the list that made me
buy the K3 - I don't like the grey.
Elecraft have said they will produce enclosures to match the K3, but I guess
not while they are shipping the first batches.
On 8/1/08 08:51, "David Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
It's a pity that Elecraft did not stick to their gray livery color to
match the K1 and K2, Stan, but it's too late for that now.
I guess they changed it so we could use our black marker pens ;-)
73 de David G4DMP
In a message dated 1/7/2008 3:23:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTE
- Original Message -
From: "Peter ZL1PWD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can confirm the k3 cabinet color is "All Black" as in the New Zealand
rugby football team!!
The K3 is, however, a better performer :-)
Simon HB9DRV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Hi Stan,
I can confirm the k3 cabinet color is "All Black" as in the New Zealand rugby
football team!!
Cheers for now and take care
Peter ZL1PWD
K3#139
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to t
Enclosure color is black.
matt - W6NIA
K3 # 24
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:47:42 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>In a message dated 1/7/2008 3:23:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Can someone tell me what the cabinet color of the K3 is? I at first
>thought it was a brown color,
In a message dated 1/7/2008 3:23:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can someone tell me what the cabinet color of the K3 is? I at first
thought it was a brown color, then I thought I saw someone remark that is
had been changed to black. Now I see remarks about using a bla
looks pretty black to me, Stan!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Rife
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:09 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 question
Can someone tell me what the cabinet color of the K3
Can someone tell me what the cabinet color of the K3 is? I at first
thought it was a brown color, then I thought I saw someone remark that is
had been changed to black. Now I see remarks about using a black magic
marker to hide the chipped paint. Is it black or brown?
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houst
Elecrafters,
Another tool that I have used sometime to suppliment
the Spectrogram program is the waterfall display of
Digipan (or any of the similar PSK31 programs). For
example, the waterfall display shows the time
dependence of the WWV components making it easy to
identify the carrier (center ban
Rick wrote:
>>Of course the audible zero-beat method works
>> fine too, but there is always the possibility of confusion about whether
>> one is zeroing the carrier or one of the transmitted tones.
I haven't had a problem with the WWV tones. I first zero on WWV, then wait
for the announcement th
David Wilburn wrote:
I have had a great deal up success using Spectrogram as Don describes.
This page is very helpful for understanding what goes on, minute by
minute, with the WWV signal.
http://tf.nist.gov/stations/iform.html
-
I consider the above method more accurate than using a fr
I have had a great deal up success using Spectrogram as Don describes.
This page is very helpful for understanding what goes on, minute by
minute, with the WWV signal.
http://tf.nist.gov/stations/iform.html
-
David Wilburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K4DGW
K2 S/N 5982
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 18:32 -0500
Cary,
500 Hz high? Now that sounds like you did the zero beat correctly, but
at one of the WWV tones rather than the carrier. I suggest you try
again. If you want to try an alternate to audible zero-beat, see below
- there will be no confusion about whether you are zero beating a WWV
tone
Hi Cary,
> I hesitate to put this question on the reflector
This what the reflector is for!
> apparently my signal is about 500 hertz higher
You ought to double check which filters you have set up for TX for each
mode. It sounds to me as if you might have a small fubar in your filter
setti
I hesitate to put this question on the reflector but "support at Elecraft" is
closed until Wednesday, Jan. 2 - understandable, they DO deserve some time off!
The assembly of K3-100 (#178) is complete and went very smoothly...all tests
checked out flawlessly, the filters are properly aligned per
Toby:
For what it may be worth... I saved a LOT of time running this sequence by
performing ALL of the 5W calibrations at one time... leaving the power set
to 5W and running through each band... then, resetting power to 50W and
running through each band again.
MUCH FASTER than having the jump fr
I'll clarify this in the manual.
tnx
Wayne
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Ed Muns wrote:
When doing the TX gain calibration (page 46/47 of the Owner's
Manual): ...
---
http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth
> When doing the TX gain calibration (page 46/47 of the Owner's Manual):
>
> 1) Does TECH MD have to be on or off? I assume on.
No. All TECH MD does is allow you to view more parameters in the CONFIG
menu, but that is irrelevant to this calibration procedure.
> 2) Does one need to be in the TXG
Now that I know that my K3 will soon be here, I am rereading the manuals
and have run into to something I'm not sure I really understand.
When doing the TX gain calibration (page 46/47 of the Owner's Manual):
1) Does TECH MD have to be on or off? I assume on.
2) Does one need to be in the TXGN
Edward Dickinson, III wrote:
Is the Line Out level fixed, or variable via the AF Gain control?
It is not affected by the AF Gain control, but there is a menu entry to
adjust it.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft maili
Is the Line Out level fixed, or variable via the AF Gain control?
Regards,
Dick - KA5KKT/4
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
htt
To: Ian J Maude; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 question
If you order the KXV3, I think you can go down to somewhere below 10mW
On 15/10/07 18:12, "Ian J Maude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
> rattray wrote:
>> If one orders the K3, 100 watt versi
If you order the KXV3, I think you can go down to somewhere below 10mW
On 15/10/07 18:12, "Ian J Maude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
> rattray wrote:
>> If one orders the K3, 100 watt version, will this also do QRP? - I'm just
>> starting to look into the K3 - tnx & 73 - Bruce.
>>
>> 72/73 - Bruce
rattray wrote:
If one orders the K3, 100 watt version, will this also do QRP? - I'm just
starting to look into the K3 - tnx & 73 - Bruce.
72/73 - Bruce ve5rc/ve5qrp - QRP-C#1, QRP-L#886, A1 Operator
QRP-Canada - http://www.qrp-canada.com
Should go all the way down to 200mW
Yes, you can turn the power down, and the PA is switched out as you go
below 10 watts, as I understand it.
--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
On 10/15/07, rattray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If one orders the K3, 1
If one orders the K3, 100 watt version, will this also do QRP? - I'm just
starting to look into the K3 - tnx & 73 - Bruce.
72/73 - Bruce ve5rc/ve5qrp - QRP-C#1, QRP-L#886, A1 Operator
QRP-Canada - http://www.qrp-canada.com
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for privat
As I have been reading the preliminary manual (wow!) I started to wonder about
a couple of things
I know the Kit has no alignment to do. How do they do that? Do they put it
all together and align it...and then ship itor does "E" just do put the
PCBs on a "test" bench and tweak it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By non-contester would you include DXer? A second receive channel to
monitor the pack when your calling a dx station on an offset is essential.
Al WA6VNN
Absolutely! I miss my old Ten Tec Omni and the Corsair we used
to use where you could listen to both VFOs.
Julian G4ILO wrote:
I'd order the second receiver in an instant if that option became a reality.
On 8/24/07, Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe even a noise nuller type setup where you have a noise antenna
> > that picks up local noise and eliminates it.
If you order KXV-3 t
I'd order the second receiver in an instant if that option became a reality.
--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com
On 8/24/07, Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe even a noise nuller type setup where you have
Of Terry Conboy
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:49 PM
> To: Elecraft
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Question
>
> At 11:41 AM 2007-08-23, Don Rasmussen wrote:
> >Assume a non-contester is looking at a K3.
> >
> >There would be no need for a second receiver nor th
By non-contester would you include DXer? A second receive channel to
monitor the pack when your calling a dx station on an offset is essential.
Al WA6VNN
** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
_
At 11:41 AM 2007-08-23, Don Rasmussen wrote:
Assume a non-contester is looking at a K3.
There would be no need for a second receiver nor the
absolute selectivity of the K3. Aside from those
points, can anyone suggest how the K3 might compare to
the Kenwood TS870?
If you operate 160m or SWL in
Don Rasmussen wrote:
Assume a non-contester is looking at a K3.
There would be no need for a second receiver nor the
absolute selectivity of the K3.
While the second receiver would be good in
a contest, I'd think it would be more beneficial
to the DXer who wants to listen to both the
DX freq a
Lyle - you are SHAMELESS. You could not find even one
thing to put in the TS870 column? ;-)
Sure I did! It is an old radio; I'm an old guy. There's something to
be said for maturity...
Lyle KK7P
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman
Lyle - you are SHAMELESS. You could not find even one
thing to put in the TS870 column? ;-)
I used one for a short time at field day once, it
seemed like a nice enough radio but I preferred the
TS830 even though it was an older design. The 830 was
"hybrid", which I rarely prefer in anything, but i
Assume a non-contester is looking at a K3.
There would be no need for a second receiver nor the
absolute selectivity of the K3. Aside from those
points, can anyone suggest how the K3 might compare to
the Kenwood TS870?
K3 is new, '870 is at least several years old, possibly unknown history.
K3 s
Assume a non-contester is looking at a K3.
There would be no need for a second receiver nor the
absolute selectivity of the K3. Aside from those
points, can anyone suggest how the K3 might compare to
the Kenwood TS870?
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
To: 'Bill Tippett'
> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 question re dual receive
>
>
> > N6KR:
> > >The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's
> > RF path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack.
>
> N6KR:
> >The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's
> RF path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack.
>
> Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3?
Yes, with the KXV3, you can select the RX antenna for either, or both,
receivers.
73,
Ed - W0YK
What protects the KRX3 sub-receiver from RF overload when it gets its
signal from the unused KATS ATU antenna jack?
73, Dick K2ZR
Bill Tippett wrote:
N6KR:
>The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's RF
path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack.
Ca
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
