Hi Bastien,
Thanks, did not know about it.
M>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
>
> > [Feature suggestion] (related to what I described in the last post of
> > this thread):
> >
> > Keep configuration options for an org file in a
Hi Marcelo,
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> [Feature suggestion] (related to what I described in the last post of
> this thread):
>
> Keep configuration options for an org file in a separate file. Could
> be:
> * nameoftheorgfile.conf
I don't think this is necessary. You can already include
[Feature suggestion] (related to what I described in the last post of this
thread):
Keep configuration options for an org file in a separate file. Could be:
* nameoftheorgfile.conf
I know it seems awkward, but I think it'd be nice if we could keep org file
configurations outside of the org file,
It's obvious, but here's the snippet to promote the headline for your
convenience:
(defun ngz-move-headline-up ()
"Move current headline to the top of the tree"
(interactive)
(unless (org-at-heading-p) (error "Not at an headline"))
(save-excursion (while (ignore-errors (org-move-subtree-u
I definitely need to get my head around elisp. Thank you very much.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
>
> > Nicolas, the function works quite well! Thanks. Just one last request:
> Is
> > it possible to not follow the item until
Hello,
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Nicolas, the function works quite well! Thanks. Just one last request: Is
> it possible to not follow the item until the bottom? The issue is that, once
> running it and when the item is sent to the bottom of the file, the pointer
> is also put there and
Nicolas, the function works quite well! Thanks. Just one last request: Is
it possible to not follow the item until the bottom? The issue is that, once
running it and when the item is sent to the bottom of the file, the pointer
is also put there and the buffer scrolls down with it.
Cheers,
M>
On
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> It needs a better optimization (my excuse for
>> `org-list-delete-item'). I will work on it tonight.
>
> Thanks!
I've pushed a draft to:
git://github.com/ngz/org-mode-lists.git move-cycle
The branch is made of two patches. T
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> That's what I thought. You are talking about headlines whereas my code
> was about plain lists:
FWIW, I was also talking about plain lists, not headlines.
--
Bastien
Hello,
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
>> Or are we talking about two different things?
>
> Not sure, maybe. What I mean is:
>
> gtd.org file:
>
> * TODO Blah
> * TODO Foo
> * TODO bar
[...]
That's what I thought. You are talking about headlines whereas my code
was about plain lists:
- Blah
-
Nicolas,
Or are we talking about two different things?
Not sure, maybe. What I mean is:
gtd.org file:
* TODO Blah
* TODO Foo
* TODO bar
Instead of:
gtd.org file:
* Tasks
** TODO Blah
** TODO Foo
** TODO Bar
So, the items in gtd.org files are all top-level, they don't belong to a
list (unles
Hello,
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Nicolas, what if all the items are top-level items? My gtd.org file is
> basically a flat list of projects and I don't have a main top list for that
> wraps them. Any ideas?
I'm not sure to understand. If all the items are at top level, the
function will
Nice discussion!
Nicolas, what if all the items are top-level items? My gtd.org file is
basically a flat list of projects and I don't have a main top list for that
wraps them. Any ideas?
Cheers,
M>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I do not agree, if I move something up, I never want it to go down.
> A list is not a circle. Maybe C-M-down, or C-u M-down
> or so might be a possibility.
Agreed, C-M-up will surely be less surprising.
Let's wait for Nicolas's patch about this and give f
On Jul 1, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Bastien wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>
>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>>
Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list h
On Jul 1, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> This does sound counter-intuitive to me.
>
> Why?
>
> The idea is that someone who wants to move a first item to the top
> really wants to cycle through items -- same for moving the bottom item
> to the bottom, where t
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>
>>> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
>>> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
>>> makes little sense. Thus, the i
Hello,
Bastien writes:
>> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
>> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
>> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its
>> list.
>
> Nice. Such a move could be bound to M- when the curs
Carsten Dominik writes:
> This does sound counter-intuitive to me.
Why?
The idea is that someone who wants to move a first item to the top
really wants to cycle through items -- same for moving the bottom item
to the bottom, where the user really wants to move it to the top.
Actually, it's imp
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> It needs a better optimization (my excuse for
> `org-list-delete-item'). I will work on it tonight.
Thanks!
I'm really excited by all this activity/features/questions.
I'm still focusing on our main goal, though, which is to
release 7.6 ASAP so that it will be incl
On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
>> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
>> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its
> list.
Nice. Such a move could be bound to M- when th
Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its list.
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defun ngz-move-item-at-bottom ()
"Move item at point at the bottom o
Hello,
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> It'd be nice if we could just send an item to the bottom of a list. Useful
> when reviewing a long list and putting the next actions in the top. Is there
> a way to do that with org currently?
Not heavily tested, but something like the following snippet
Hi list,
It'd be nice if we could just send an item to the bottom of a list. Useful
when reviewing a long list and putting the next actions in the top. Is there
a way to do that with org currently?
Cheers,
M>
25 matches
Mail list logo
