On 28/06/2025 03:26, Charles Choi wrote:
On Jun 27, 2025, at 7:56 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
P.S. Has anybody tried org-protocol with Emacs installed as flatpak?
Interesting. I can imagine how sandboxed applications on both Linux and
Windows (UWP) would have restrictions on accessing emacsclient a
Charles Choi writes:
>> On Jun 26, 2025, at 5:16 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
>>
>> I would keep contents of this section either in the current article or in
>> archive (but accessible from web). Certainly it should be marked as a
>> historical artifact.
>>
>
> Honestly, I’m not seeing there being
> On Jun 27, 2025, at 7:56 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> I have not experimented with flatpak/snap, but sandboxed applications on
> Linux do not have access to emacsclient and Emacs socket (at least by
> default) as well, so it is more general limitation. I hope, XDG desktop
> portal allows to di
On 27/06/2025 04:47, Charles Choi wrote:
On Jun 26, 2025, at 2:44 AM, Christian Moe wrote:
I was going to just apply this simple change right away, but it strikes
me that it entails some further changes that might as well be done in
the same patch. Suggestions:
[...]
Perhaps a more concise rewo
On 27/06/2025 04:57, Charles Choi wrote:
On Jun 26, 2025, at 5:16 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
I think, we may save some time for new users by clearly saying that
specific instructions were applicable several years ago, but there is no
point to try them now even if org-protocol does not work.
The
> On Jun 26, 2025, at 5:16 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> I would keep contents of this section either in the current article or in
> archive (but accessible from web). Certainly it should be marked as a
> historical artifact.
>
Honestly, I’m not seeing there being much value to having the Oper
> On Jun 26, 2025, at 2:44 AM, Christian Moe wrote:
>
> Please add "header" to the subject line of the patch for clarity (we're
> removing the header, not the apps).
Amended subject line for this thread.
>
> I was going to just apply this simple change right away, but it strikes
> me that it
On 26/06/2025 16:44, Christian Moe wrote:
Charles Choi writes:
Patch v1 (addd8dcd) for Worg org-protocol.org: Remove 3rd Party Applications
header submitted for review.
Subject: [PATCH] org-protocol.org: Remove 3rd party applications
Please add "header" to the subject line of the patch fo
Charles Choi writes:
> Patch v1 (addd8dcd) for Worg org-protocol.org: Remove 3rd Party Applications
> header submitted for review.
>
>
> [2. text/x-diff; 0001-org-protocol.org-Remove-3rd-party-applications.patch]...
>
Thanks!
> Subject: [PATCH] org-protocol.org: Remove 3rd party applications
Patch v1 (addd8dcd) for Worg org-protocol.org: Remove 3rd Party Applications
header submitted for review.
0001-org-protocol.org-Remove-3rd-party-applications.patch
Description: Binary data
—
Charles Y. Choi, Ph.D.
kickingve...@gmail.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
