This thread raised an interesting question
http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/49-basic-configuration/27669-following-error-and-velocity/45528
The user was seeing the f-error switch to exponential notation, not
seeing the e in the middle, and assuming e-error spikes.
As the hal-status wat
We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
Machinekit is an overhaul of the real-time and glue infrastructure which
supports LinuxCNC. Machinekit is intended to be broadly applicable to real-time
control applications. Non-CNC systems such as general automatio
On 3 April 2014 15:26, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
I have no idea what this means.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
---
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:02 +0100, andy pugh wrote:
> This thread raised an interesting question
> http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/49-basic-configuration/27669-following-error-and-velocity/45528
>
> The user was seeing the f-error switch to exponential notation, not
> seeing the e in t
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, dave wrote:
> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:28:22 -0700
> From: dave
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Another query on numerical formats
>
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:02 +0100, andy pugh wrote:
>> This thread raised an interesting question
>> http://linuxcnc.o
On 3-4-2014 17:20, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 15:26, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
> I have no idea what this means.
>
Progress (I hope).
--
I like a fixed point option, Having it switch while watching in real time
makes it difficult to follow.
Frank
From: "Peter C. Wallace"
To: dengv...@charter.net, EMC developers
,
Date: 04/03/2014 10:43 AM
Subject:Re: [Emc-developers] Another query on numerical format
On 04/03/2014 06:02 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> This thread raised an interesting question
> http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/49-basic-configuration/27669-following-error-and-velocity/45528
>
> The user was seeing the f-error switch to exponential notation, not
> seeing the e in the middle, a
On 04/03/2014 09:26 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
>
>
Oh MY! World War III, here we go!
Jon
--
___
I wish both projects the very best, as I beleave both sides have there
right to exist. The future will show what the user likes more. From my
side I will try to go on with gmoccapy and my new baby luminos. It may
cost a little bit more work, but I would be glade if my GUI would be in
both proje
Hi All,
Is there a hard limit on the size of the NML buffers defined in
linuxcnc.nml? If not, does anyone know if increasing the buffer size leads
to a performance hit on a modern PC? I couldn't find much info on how the
channel buffer sizes were chosen on the web.
Thanks,
Rob
---
I, for one, welcome our new machine-kit-controlled robot overlords :D
Ian (ssi)
On Apr 3, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 09:26 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
>>
>>
> Oh MY! World War III, here
I can recall, at least a year ago, building a xenomai enabled kernel on my
severely flea weight iron laptop, which has a 1400Mhz turion cpu in it, and
being rather surprised at what it was able to do at the time. Latencies
were shall we say acceptable. But not having a parport, it was basicall
On 3 April 2014 18:57, Gene Heskett wrote:
> It sure would be nice if I could run a sim mode on this machine...
If you want to run in sim mode you don't need any kind of realtime
kernel at all.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
-
On Thursday 03 April 2014 14:31:29 andy pugh did opine:
> On 3 April 2014 18:57, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > It sure would be nice if I could run a sim mode on this machine...
>
> If you want to run in sim mode you don't need any kind of realtime
> kernel at all.
Attempting to run this mornings 2.5
On 3 April 2014 19:48, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Attempting to run this mornings 2.5.3 update, I get a requester to please
> reboot to the 2.6.32-rtai kernel: [copy/paste]
2.5.3 doesn't run on Xenomai. Neither will 2.6. 2.7 might, but I won't
be holding my breath.
If you want to run in sim mode on
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:09:33 -0500
> From: Jon Elson
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [ANNOUNCE] Machinekit project
> To: EMC developers
> Message-ID: <533d95cd.8010...@pico-systems.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 04/03/2014 09:26 AM, Mic
On Thursday 03 April 2014 15:58:48 andy pugh did opine:
> On 3 April 2014 19:48, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Attempting to run this mornings 2.5.3 update, I get a requester to
> > please reboot to the 2.6.32-rtai kernel: [copy/paste]
>
> 2.5.3 doesn't run on Xenomai. Neither will 2.6. 2.7 might, but
On 3 April 2014 20:59, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> If you want to run in sim mode on a normal kernel then you need a
>> dedicated sim build, as are available from the buildbot.
>
> At what link? I wasn't even aware it was a separate build.
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org
Choose your flavour of "simula
On Thursday 03 April 2014 18:01:44 andy pugh did opine:
> On 3 April 2014 20:59, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> If you want to run in sim mode on a normal kernel then you need a
> >> dedicated sim build, as are available from the buildbot.
> >
> > At what link? I wasn't even aware it was a separate b
On Thursday 03 April 2014 18:19:29 Gene Heskett did opine:
> On Thursday 03 April 2014 18:01:44 andy pugh did opine:
> > On 3 April 2014 20:59, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >> If you want to run in sim mode on a normal kernel then you need a
> > >> dedicated sim build, as are available from the buildb
On Thursday 03 April 2014 18:40:05 Gene Heskett did opine:
> On Thursday 03 April 2014 18:19:29 Gene Heskett did opine:
> > On Thursday 03 April 2014 18:01:44 andy pugh did opine:
> > > On 3 April 2014 20:59, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > >> If you want to run in sim mode on a normal kernel then you
On 04/03/2014 11:23 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Is there a hard limit on the size of the NML buffers defined in
> linuxcnc.nml? If not, does anyone know if increasing the buffer size leads
> to a performance hit on a modern PC? I couldn't find much info on how the
> channel buffer sizes were chos
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:43:21PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> More gr. Seems google tells me it doesn't exist until 12.04.3.
Seb did the work of backporting libmodbus5 to lucid (and hardy!) to
make this easy for people who don't want to upgrade. Knowing this I
was able to find instructi
My understanding is the size is basically the size of the shared memory
block. It needs to be as big as the largest message that is sent between
processes. Since linuxcnc works with a queue depth of 1, increasing above
that max msg size (15k I think) does nothing. Go below the max message
size,
On Friday 04 April 2014 02:19:44 Chris Radek did opine:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:43:21PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > More gr. Seems google tells me it doesn't exist until 12.04.3.
>
> Seb did the work of backporting libmodbus5 to lucid (and hardy!) to
> make this easy for people who d
On 2014-04-04 06:04, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:43:21PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> More gr. Seems google tells me it doesn't exist until 12.04.3.
> Seb did the work of backporting libmodbus5 to lucid (and hardy!) to
> make this easy for people who don't want to upgrade
27 matches
Mail list logo
