I realised my opinion would come to bite me in the foot as I was
diagnosing the linuxcncrsh-tcp test.
I did come to realise that yes remote GUI would have a place in an
industrial setting.
I would imagine if the protocol was simple enough and with tcp a mid to
hi end microcontroller with a
Hi,
my answer was rejected yesterday, so I try to resend it ...
On Sonntag, 3. Mai 2020, 16:17:46 CEST Johannes Fassotte wrote:
> The name remote UI should be considered to mean that it is interfaced to
> LinuxCNC using a network connection. This connection for most individuals
> would likely be
The slow update rate is likely a method issue and not an issue with network
speed itself. Most networks can handle speeds of GB per second rates which is
much much faster than actually required. Networks are used to stream all sorts
of data these days. Lagging behind can indicate a buffer
On Sunday 03 May 2020 10:17:46 Johannes Fassotte wrote:
> The name remote UI should be considered to mean that it is interfaced
> to LinuxCNC using a network connection. This connection for most
> individuals would likely be via local host but it can be used remotely
> if desired from other
On 05/03/2020 07:26 AM, Robert Murphy wrote:
Machinekit, IMHO, seemed to be focused more towards the
hobbyist who
wants bells and whistles rather than an
industrial\commercial scene.
Well, no. A major focus was to support multiple instances
of Machinekit working in the same
physical space,
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 3. Mai 2020, 10:43:12 CEST N wrote:
> > Reading manual. "motion -- accepts NML motion commands" so I guees you want
> > some of these commands to come from your hardware buttons?
>
> Well, my idea is to have hardware buttons for every command, so that the UI
> is
> just
The name remote UI should be considered to mean that it is interfaced to
LinuxCNC using a network connection. This connection for most individuals would
likely be via local host but it can be used remotely if desired from other
suitable devices. Such a interface adds flexibility and would
I agree, I never saw the sense in a remote UI, other than all the
"hipster\makers" want to control the world with their phones.
Machinekit, IMHO, seemed to be focused more towards the hobbyist who
wants bells and whistles rather than an industrial\commercial scene.
Don't take this as having a go,
Hi,
On Sonntag, 3. Mai 2020, 10:43:12 CEST N wrote:
> Reading manual. "motion -- accepts NML motion commands" so I guees you want
> some of these commands to come from your hardware buttons?
Well, my idea is to have hardware buttons for every command, so that the UI is
just an infoboard.
Don't
Hi Daniel,
> It seems some developer at machinekit did some good work there.
> ...
> ... are the best features in machinekit that are missing in linuxcnc.
Hm, I don't think, that a remote ui is something important, that linuxcnc is
missing. And I don't take the nml-layer for bad so that it
> On Sonntag, 3. Mai 2020, 09:13:22 CEST N wrote:
> > That said it might still make sense to have some kind of
> > communication in between GUI and hal ...
>
> Yes!
>
> I'd like to implement my buttons in hardware, together with some potis and
> currently I don't know, how to get rid of it from
Hi from Brazil!
It seems some developer at machinekit did some good work there. I tested
this:.
https://machinekoder.com/extending-machineface-with-hal-remote-to-control-smart-plugs/
years ago, and that worked pretty well.
IMHO haltalk and machinetalk:
https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines
Should we be adding things to /etc/dpkg/origins ?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper,
On Sonntag, 3. Mai 2020, 09:13:22 CEST N wrote:
> That said it might still make sense to have some kind of
> communication in between GUI and hal ...
Yes!
I'd like to implement my buttons in hardware, together with some potis and
currently I don't know, how to get rid of it from my gui.
I know,
> Please don't ditch Axis. It's nice, clean & simple and I found it quite
> intuitive to use. It works well for my hobby class 3 axis mill.
Guess it do exactly what it should but have no other experience with other GUI
for CNC machine.
> I like the fact that there is a GUI included with
15 matches
Mail list logo
