Agreed on all accounts. It is also possible that options 1 and/or 2
could be structure in such a way to support option 3 (simula gdb).
I was serious about the intern thing. If one was interested I would be
glad to try to help with mentioning, but I have roughly a petabyte of
data to process a
Right now, you get an error together with a line number.
A good fix would be to do a stack backtrace. If it is in a subroutine, show
the line that it was called from including the values of all of the
arguments. Then, if that line is in a subroutine, show where it was called
from with its argument
On Nov 6 2015 4:44 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 06 November 2015 09:09:26 EBo wrote:
>
>> On Nov 6 2015 6:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote:
>> >> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux
>> >>
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> > gcode is terrible
On Friday 06 November 2015 09:09:26 EBo wrote:
> On Nov 6 2015 6:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote:
> >> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux
> >>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > gcode is terrible IMHO.
> >>
> >> It's a terrible programming language
> ...
> It seems that you deleted bringing_features
> ...
The 'bringin_features' branch rebased on git master was deleted to
avoid confustion with a newer branch 'features_preview' based
on git 2.7 (the current release)
> ...
> But you should not work with version 2.0 it is outdated, having been
On Nov 6 2015 6:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux
>>
> wrote:
>> > gcode is terrible IMHO.
>>
>> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended
>> to be one.
>
> I wouldn't con
On Friday 06 November 2015 04:53:15 andy pugh wrote:
> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux
wrote:
> > gcode is terrible IMHO.
>
> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended
> to be one.
I wouldn't condem it quite that vociferously. It has the basic trig
fun
On Nov 6 2015 6:19 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 6 November 2015 at 12:57, EBo wrote:
>>> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never
>>> intended
>>> to be one.
>>
>> fine, but what is better? STEP-NC (ISO-10303/14649)?
>
> It is a machine control language, not a programming languag
On 6 November 2015 at 12:57, EBo wrote:
>> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended
>> to be one.
>
> fine, but what is better? STEP-NC (ISO-10303/14649)?
It is a machine control language, not a programming language.
If you want a programming language then it probably
On Nov 6 2015 2:53 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux
> wrote:
>> gcode is terrible IMHO.
>
> It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended
> to be one.
fine, but what is better? STEP-NC (ISO-10303/14649)?
--
On 6 November 2015 at 04:29, Fernand Veilleux wrote:
> gcode is terrible IMHO.
It's a terrible programming language, but then it was never intended to be one.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
-
Le 2015-10-26 13:09, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit :
> Hello Nick and Fernand, I'm a developer on the LinuxCNC project and
> we've been talking about getting linuxcnc-features into the next
> stable release of linuxcnc.
>
> Is this something you'd be interested in, willing to help with?
>
> We not
(Please CC the emc-developers list in any replies you send.)
On 10/28/2015 02:27 AM, Nick wrote:
> Hello Sebastian.
>
> You should consider Fern's
> repo http://fernv.github.io/linuxcnc-features/ as it is latest one.
>
> We are interested in including Features into linuxcnc repo because it
> w
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 02:55:35 Nick wrote:
> Major benefit of including Features into the LinuxCNC - is making it
> much easier to install.
> So if we already have needed changes in the GladeVCP files will
> simplify the installation procedure a lot. All we'll have to do is put
> all the fi
Hi Nick,
thanks for the message.
Your 'Features' is nice.
Thanks to FernV also.
The name change is just to avoid some confusion.
Большое спасибо
хорошая работа !
regards
TomP tjtr33
On 09/15/2015 01:55 AM, Nick wrote:
> Major benefit of including Features into the LinuxCNC - is making it much
>
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 02:55:35 Nick wrote:
> Major benefit of including Features into the LinuxCNC - is making it
> much easier to install.
> So if we already have needed changes in the GladeVCP files will
> simplify the installation procedure a lot. All we'll have to do is put
> all the fi
Major benefit of including Features into the LinuxCNC - is making it much
easier to install.
So if we already have needed changes in the GladeVCP files will simplify
the installation procedure a lot. All we'll have to do is put all the files
into the configuration directory and add features into in
On Monday 14 September 2015 17:11:10 EBo wrote:
> On Sep 14 2015 1:37 PM, Andrew wrote:
> > 2015-09-14 21:13 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
> >> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> >> > However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name
> >> > of
> >>
> >> a
> >>
> >> > co
also the name 'features' is Nick's pretty good reduction of the idea
into 1 word. The idea is to take simple block, and add what the west
might call 'details' like pockets, cbores, flanges, dowel pin holes.
Not really meant for contoured, islanded pockets with lofted aerospace
curves. But day to
On 14 September 2015 at 22:11, EBo wrote:
> Has anyone made videos to showcase it running?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6ZxQrjfAE0
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
__
better yet google "Nick Drobchenko"
he's the wiz
tomp
--
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-de
yes Nick has several oyutube videos, google "youtube cnc ru features"
> Has anyone made videos to showcase it running?
>
--
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@list
On Sep 14 2015 1:37 PM, Andrew wrote:
> 2015-09-14 21:13 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
>
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>>
>> > However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of
>> a
>> > conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration
>> of th
2015-09-14 21:13 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>
> > However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> > conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> > things LinuxCNC can do.
> >
>
>
> LiveCAM?
>
>
On 14 September 2015 at 20:11, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> As the author describes it in russian forum, it is similar to ngcgui -
> it allows to create subroutines and macros for mills and lathes.
But more than that, there is already quite a range of existing subroutines.
Also, given the enthusiasm
2015-09-14 21:32 GMT+03:00 EBo :
> it is not really a collection of CAM software is it? What exactly do
> all the features do, or intended to do?
As the author describes it in russian forum, it is similar to ngcgui -
it allows to create subroutines and macros for mills and lathes.
--
Just a suggestion:
Just fancy, linuxcnc is the distribution and "linuxcnc-feature" is a
package of this distribution.
So they have to take care delivering a working package.
Would this be a approach?
g m
On 2015-09-14 19:43, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 9/14/15 10:54 AM, Jeff Epler
it is not really a collection of CAM software is it? What exactly do
all the features do, or intended to do?
On Sep 14 2015 12:13 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>
>> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
>> conversatio
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> things LinuxCNC can do.
>
LiveCAM?
>
> --
> Sebastian Kuzminsky
>
> --
On 9/14/15 10:54 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> If the goal is to have better online collaboration for this
> linuxcnc-related project, I think at least some conderation should be
> given to using github rather than hosting on git.linuxcnc.org.
Managing this and other LinuxCNC add-ons as separate project
On 14 September 2015 at 17:54, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Being in linuxcnc.git might be the worst possible choice for a new and
> fast-moving project,
The fact that you think it is "New" seems to show something about it
needing more exposure. Nick first mentioned it in May 2013.
--
atp
If you can't f
If the goal is to have better online collaboration for this
linuxcnc-related project, I think at least some conderation should be
given to using github rather than hosting on git.linuxcnc.org.
I feel like github would give better visibility (as you mention,
wizards.git is an almost-forgotten thing
On 14 September 2015 at 16:21, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> The popularity might be the difficulty in installing Nick's Features.
This is partly why I would like to "bring it in from the cold" so to speak.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
-
The popularity might be the difficulty in installing Nick's Features.
I havent followed the forum, and i have asked.
I will read the forum now.
And for the name..
Linuxcnc Features or Features is about as good as Axis
google linuxcnc axis to see why
didnt hurt the popularity of axis the front end
On 14 September 2015 at 16:03, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end.
Well, _I_ don't like the name "Axis" for a GUI, that
could cause all sorts of confusion :-)
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it
On 14 September 2015 at 16:03, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> things LinuxCNC can do.
Yes, and I suspect that this is part of the reason that it has been
On 9/14/15 6:14 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> I have just suggested (on the forum) that "LinuxCNC Features" should
> be brought under LinuxCNC version control, and become part of the
> project.
>
> http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/40-subroutines-and-ngcgui/26578-linuxcnc-features-a-kind-of-
I have just suggested (on the forum) that "LinuxCNC Features" should
be brought under LinuxCNC version control, and become part of the
project.
http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/40-subroutines-and-ngcgui/26578-linuxcnc-features-a-kind-of-ngcgui?start=240#62559
I can't decide if it s
38 matches
Mail list logo
