Conical Monopole 1-18 GHz antenna

2003-09-30 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello all, I am looking for and ARA CMA-118/A to evaluate. anyone have one to loan? Thanks, Ken Hall This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your

RE: Extending Freq Range of Sig Gen

2003-08-29 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, I brought a frequency doubler from marki Microwave mix...@markimicrowave.com 408-778-4200 From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:41 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Extending Freq Range of Sig Gen I need to

RE: power-line LAN

2003-01-30 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, They are usually called PLC/PLT Power Line Carrier systems. On the ones I have seen conducted emissions are exempt in the US, carrier current system, and the radiated is usually done at several typical locations (houses). All the manufacturers I have talked to would like to be able to do

RE: Antenna mast

2002-11-15 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
5:01 PM To: ken_h...@hp.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Antenna mast But, HDusa doesn't support that. HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1) ken_h...@hp.com 11/14/02 10:56pm Hello, Check www.hdusa.net HDusa. regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From: KC CHAN [PDD

RE: Antenna mast

2002-11-14 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, Check www.hdusa.net HDusa. regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From: KC CHAN [PDD] [mailto:kcc...@hkpc.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:22 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Antenna mast Dear all I would like to see if anyone who knows the contract of

RE: Conducted Line Emissions

2002-11-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, Interesting, looks like you meet the old FCC requireemnts. I think the new FCC requirements are to the CISPR A and B limits. Regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From: Dan Pierce [mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:05 PM To:

RE: Measuring AC Line Impedance

2002-11-05 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, UL emc in Northbrook has the capoability http://www.ul.com/emc/ Regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From: robert.s...@flextronics.com [mailto:robert.s...@flextronics.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:16 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Measuring AC

RE: Temp/Humidity Meter

2002-10-31 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, We buy Radio Shack and others and have them calibrated by MicroPrecision Regards, Ken Hall Hewlett-Packard http://www.microprecision.com/index.html -Original Message- From: POWELL, DOUG [mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:42 PM To: 'Flinders,

RE: Measurement Consistency of OATS

2002-07-08 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, For uncertainty take a look at Results of the CISPR/A Radiated Emission Round Robin Test, P.A. Beeckman and J.J. Goedbloed IEEE 2001. Summary of 15 sites - controlled EUT 4 dB vartiation, Un-controlled EUT up to 9 dB variation. Regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From:

RE: Measurement Uncertainty

2002-06-17 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, We use an agilent E4419B +/- 0.02dB log or 0.5% linear with an E4412A Mount with an uncertainty of 1.3%. See http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-6382E.pdf for uncertainty. Regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From: khar...@lexmark.com [mailto:khar...@lexmark.com]

RE: Measurement below 30MHz

2002-06-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello KC, The attached message leads you a web site that discusses the 20 versus 40 dB/decade problem. ANSI/NIST may/should be doing a study. Regards, Ken Hall -Original Message- From: KC CHAN [PDD] [mailto:kcc...@hkpc.org] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:36 PM To:

RE: Obtaining Lab Accreditation

2002-04-19 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, We have developed an online system to/that meets the 17025 requirements. If my boss wants to share he will get in touch. Regards, Ken Hall Hewlett Packard -Original Message- From: don_macart...@selinc.com [mailto:don_macart...@selinc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:57

RE: Suitable CDN for IEC61000-4-6 ethernet 10/100

2002-04-19 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, We have purchased CDN from Fischer Custom Communications. Regards, Ken Hall Hewlett Packard -Original Message- From: david_ster...@ademco.com [mailto:david_ster...@ademco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:05 PM To: carpenti...@thmulti.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org

RE: 2.45 GHz filter

2002-04-19 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, We use an RLC BRF-1047 (0210). RLC URL http://www.rlcelectronics.com/catalog.htm In looking at the RLC Filter order number identification what I have will not do the job but does. It was a special order. Regards, Ken Hall Hewlett-packard -Original Message- From: KC CHAN [PDD]

RE: Magnetic Testing

2002-04-19 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, We use a Walker Scientific FGM - 3D1 Ken Hall -Original Message- From: Pittman, Bud [mailto:bpitt...@lsil.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:44 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Magnetic Testing Although this is not an EMC standard it is related. My lab has

RE: High Frequency Pre-amp

2001-12-21 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, Miteq JS22-00050800-15-14P with 40 dB gain, 30 to 8000 MHZ Contact Rizwan Syed at 631-439-9458 Miteq AFS66-00102650 - 45-5P-66 40 dB gain Agilent 83006 10 MHz to 26 GHz 20 dB minimum Agilent 83017 The Agilent amplifiers are not as sensitive to ESD as the Miteq's. The gain of the

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-10 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Services Is Our Specialty Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis -Original Message- From: HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:ken_h...@hp.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:09 AM To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello Gary and all, The point is do an experiment with your Stepping receiver. Ken -Original Message- From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:36 AM To: 'HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)'; 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello all, We typically measure in 500 MHz spans, our spectrum analyzer has 400 bits so 1.25 MHz/bit. Concerned that we could miss an emission I perfromed the below experiment, try it: Injected a 2950 MHz signal into EMI Receiver, set for 1MHz RBW, and measured it using diffrent Spans 3 000

RE: Impedance Stabilization Network

2001-11-27 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, To my knowledge there are no ISN's that meet all the requirements of CISPR22:1997. CISPR/I/11/CDV has proposes different, less stringent, LCL requirements that the suppliers (RS,Schaffner Fischer Custom communications)stated to the committee they could meet. See IEEE2001 EMC Symposium

RE: Immunity testing of Headset

2001-08-24 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello all, Very interesting questions. While at the C63 meeting one of the attendees asked how we measure the acoustic noise from speakers when testing radiated and conducted Immunity. We do not test PC's with speakers so no requirement. Telephone Terminal Equipment has a similar requirement.

RE: Vertical Ground Plane

2001-08-22 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello, The vertical ground plane is referred to/required in CISPR22:1997 for conducted emissions if the EUT is on a table 80 CM from the floor. If the table is 40 CM from the ground plane it is not required. See figures 4 through 6 of CISPR22:1997. In ANSI it is optional. This requirement is the

RE: ETSI EMC Stadard

2001-08-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
IEC 61000-4-3 1995+A1:1998 covers 800-960 MHz and 1.4 to 2.0 GHz for protection from digital Radio telephones -Original Message- From: wo...@sensormatic.com [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:16 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: ETSI EMC Stadard

RE: ESD - time between successive discharges

2001-08-02 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
Hello all, If I remember correctly the one shot/second was to allow older simulators time to recharge. We believe that the probability of identifying an ESD susceptible product is increased dramatically when subjecting the product to continuous discharges. Ken Hall Lonnie please file.