I am not an entomologist but is it possible it has nothing to do with E and H
fields? Could it simply be that it is just a nice dry/warm environment for them
to produce offspring. I have observed ants just last spring in my low voltage
transformers for my landscape lights. When you disturb them
Hello group,
I am having discussions with my team here in Michigan about what mandatory
marks need to be on a device or component that is currently being developed. It
will be a small measurement device rated 5 VDC @ 1.2 A. The device/component
goes into a larger (ITE) system which will
Hi Brian,
The EU does not require disclosure of an exemption, for China RoHS a disclosure
table is required. Always a good idea to have this information internally if
ever challenged.
Regards,
Mark
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:34 AM
To:
are required. Is this correct?
Thank you,
Mark Schmidt
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
All em
Carl,
In regard to your statement Another package may include plastic panels with no
inherent standalone function In this case there are no harmonized standards
that I am aware of for plastics so I will further assume that no CE Mark is
required.
Mark Schmidt
-Original Message-
From
Components
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d1190c534d...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
In regard to your statement Another package may include plastic panels
with no inherent standalone function In this case there are no
harmonized
Brian,
May I be candid here. A local hardware store in the USA is not going to have
traceability to RoHS compliance. It is highly likely they won’t even know what
it is. Testing is way too expensive and time consuming, I would even go as far
to say it’s unreliable as well. Procurement from a
Hi Group,
I am a bit confused about what standard may apply for DC powered Boat Motor. I
am being told that EN55012 applies. I am not convinced. Thoughts?
Thank you ,
Mark Schmidt
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] DC Boat Motor
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d11908871b...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
I am a bit confused about what standard may apply for DC powered Boat
Motor. I am being told that EN55012
find it will be addressed on
a case by case basis and there is no one standard/requirement to blanket Hong
Kong for assurance of entry into HK.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
-Original Message-
From: Price, Andrew (Selex ES, UK) [mailto:andrew.p.pr...@selex-es.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10
Hello Brian,
The Voltage/ freq. is 220 VAC 60Hz. Not sure about your Measurement uncertainty
question. I do have an opinion though
Mark
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 6:06 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Korean EMC
/mechanical/files/machinery/guide-appl-2006-42-ec-2nd-201006_en.pdf
Regards,
Lauren Crane
KLA-Tencor
From: Mark Schmidt
mark.schm...@dornerworks.commailto:mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Monday, November
is that it should include a list of
which EHSRs are met or not met. Where or how do I determine if these are met or
not. Is there a good place to reference? Any help is appreciated like I said I
am a newbie when it comes to the Machinery Directive.
Thanks,
Mark Schmidt
Although not a requirement, I have used corporate logos on my DoC's. They were
not on letterhead but nonetheless the Logo/Trademark was on the DoC. I viewed
it similarly to a CB Scheme Safety report that requires the Trademark and a
copy of the marking plate to further assist in identifying
I too provided on request, however I also provided a condensed version of the
DoC in the manual. This was placed on the second and third page in the manual,
you might call it a Regulatory page(s). For the CE Declaration potion it would
have contact info of the Manufacturer and the European Rep,
that the unintentional radiator had
to meet Class B EN55022/CISPR 22 for ITE with 6 db margin. Naturally we failed.
This is not an ITE product and was not designed to meet Class B any comments
are appreciated.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Thanks,
Mark Schmidt
to meet Class B
CISPR 22.
From: McInturff, Gary [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Mark Schmidt; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: RE: RTTE
I'm curious about the 6 dB margin. Is that in the Korean version of the
standard? Usually standards
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d119068e70...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
Apparently when the Koreans adopted EN301489-1 the KN version of this
standard omitted the clause in Annex C.3.1. So we had the device
tested in-country
wasn't missing you would think
that this approach would be acceptable.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
From: Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:31 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Rejected Manufacturer Declarations
Colleagues,
I had a client relate
Dan,
NiCd is not allowed period. I actually had a customer refuse delivery and they
sent back the battery packs. My understanding is that you must meet 62133 when
shipping batteries separate or as spare parts. If they are shipped in the
device then it is not required, like you said they
but it may not and at a
global level I am a bit confused as well, I do not see how the machinery
directive would apply but it was suggested. Or should I just meet the EMC,
RTTE and the General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC?
Best Regards and Thank you,
Mark Schmidt
I should have been more clear.
Trolling motor = Electric motor, for propulsion through water - normally
mounted to the bow of a fishing/bass boat.
Mark Schmidt
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:06 AM
To: EMC
In both cases it is directed at electrical and electronic equipment.
Mark
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:53 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] RoHS Question
A few weeks ago we discussed if cables were included in the RoHS
RoHS Directive.
Accessory items such as you've described may or may not have other EU
directives applicable to them.
Comments?
IHTH.
Best regards,
Ron
From: Mark Schmidt [mailto:mark.schm...@dornerworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 8:59 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC
of the opinion that they need to be tested
together. Bullets 2 and 3 are very good questions that I do not have an answer
for. I am sure the group can help and look forward to their responses.
Mark Schmidt
From: Grace Lin [mailto:graceli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:51 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
Hello All,
I have not been able to determine if the CCC Mark is required in China for a
light industrial application laser - First Catalog of products only indicate
some ITE products. All research indicates no requirement. Any information you
can provide is helpful.
Thanks,
Mark Schmidt
Hi Gary,
Your only requirement is ROHS. If your customers need evidence or question EMC
and Product Safety, you can then justify your steps taken to attain Due
Diligence to the specific applicable standards.
Regards,
Mark
From: McInturff, Gary [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
Sent:
I believe that the 60068-2-x series suggests the test levels (although
this is based on your application for the device) but specifically
defines the test methods
Mark Schmidt
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Barker,
Neil
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 12:11 PM
adapters (wall-warts) are
low risk but switchers would have increased risk.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
mschm...@xrite.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Leber
Jody-G19980
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:36 AM
To: emc-p
at the FDA listed in Laser
Notice 53 unsuccessfully. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.
Mark
Mark Schmidt
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com
- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
Correction Should be IEC60825-1 not IEC60950
From: Mark Schmidt
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 10:17 AM
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: Class IIIa Laser
Hi everyone,
I having trouble understanding the requirements for use of a Class IIIa laser
(laser
Hi Peter,
Thank you,
Yes - I needed to know if I am required to file with CDRH. Is there a
standard form to use or guidance document to follow? I could not find
this.
Thanks again,
Mark Schmidt
mschm...@xrite.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Tarver,
Peter
Peter - Thanks - I am not sure how I missed it but I did.
Mark Schmidt
mschm...@xrite.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Tarver,
Peter
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 12:43 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Class IIIa Laser Correction
Refer to Lines 60, 63
Hi Terry,
You might try the following link.
http://www.phihong.com/
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
Grandville, MI
USA
(616) 257 2469
mailto:mschm...@xrite.com mschm...@xrite.com
their registered
place of business of the address of the registered place of business and the
category of devices concerned.
3. The Member States shall on request inform the other Member States and the
Commission of the details referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Thank you,
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory
Hello Group,
Are there any requirements for European Distributors of Medical Devices, i.e.
license or registration. The Device in question is a Class 1 device.
Thank you.
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
Grandville, MI
USA
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com
Hi Scott,
Our UK office has inquired to us about NAMAS accreditation. I think possibly
EN45001 and EN45002 may also apply.
Good Luck,
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
Grandville, MI
USA
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com
-Original Message-
From: scott
It is not a double pole fuse and that is not a requirement.
Regards,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Crabb, John [mailto:jo...@exchange.scotland.ncr.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:04 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:RE: IEC60320
I have never heard of an
Oops, I seem to left the problem out. The manufacturer now puts a rib in
the spare fuse holder so you cannot put a spare fuse in. Sorry for the
confusion.
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
USA
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark
the manufacturer indicating that the design
change was made in order to comply with IEC60320. It seems to me that we
have now introduced a additional risk, it just doesn’t make sense to me.
Any comments?
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
USA
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com
Accreditation to NAMAS, deals with Traceably and Calibration issues.
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
USA
(616) 257 2469
mailto:mschm...@xrite.com mschm...@xrite.com
-Original Message-
From: Stone, Richard A (Richard) [mailto:rsto...@lucent.com]
Sent
Thanks, I appreciate the input.
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
USA
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc
and warning signs in the IIIb compartment of the system ?
Thank you,
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
USA
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Mckean [mailto:dmck...@corp.auspex.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:17 PM
To: emc
, is then expanded and used in this same system reducing
the beam intensity to Class I levels. Would the overall system be
classified as Class I ?
Thanks.
Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance
X-Rite Incorporated
U.S.A.
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com
Dave,
1. Your client must have a presence in Australia.
2. Your client must apply in order to sell your product, you cannot.
3. Provide your client with the applicable certs and documents for their
assessment, since they are now responsible for compliance.
4. If you decide to apply the C-tick
Jody,
CE is an abbreviation of a French phrase Conformite Europeene. I have
seen this on multiple websites but here is one for reference.
http://www.ce-mark.com/cedoc.html
Regards,
Mark
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Hi Nick,
To assist you in determining the applicable standards you should contact
a representative from JAAME or MHLW at the following address:
Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) New York
Health, Labor and Welfare Department
McGraw- Hill Building 44th Floor
1221 Avenue of the Americas
There are IPC standards here is one example, I am sure there are more;
IPC-3710 - Acceptability of Wiring/Cable Harnesses, Electronic Cable
Assemblies, Cord Sets, and Wires
I am pretty sure these documents will not accommodate EMI design. That
will be left to your imagination and expertise.
John,
This is how I understand it.
Japanese Regulation
New compulsory requirements were targeted for April 1, 2001. Enforcement
of this new law is regulated under Denan. Regulatory requirements are
similar to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) requirements.
Japan, for
Hello everyone,
I am new to laser regulation and was wondering if there is such a thing as
your basic open frame power supply meeting the requirements of IEC60825? I
need a + 15 Vdc output at approximately 100 Watts. I have not read the
standard yet and don't know how it compares with IEC60950.
, but the
responsibility resides with the Company.
Mark Schmidt
-Original Message-
From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:ctho...@patton.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:06 PM
To: emcpost
Subject:Responsibilities
Hello group,
I have a question concerning responsibility when
Is the use of Red LED's acceptable for I.T.E. equipment in the EU in
accordance with LVD and EMCD? All comments welcome.
Thank you.
Mark Schmidt
X-Rite Incorporated
U.S.A.
mschm...@xrite.com
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product
Nick,
Check this out http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice/16.html#page_index it will
assist in classifying your medical device/equipment for the US market.
Regards,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 11:15
Chris,
The way I understood it a couple years ago import and exploitation of
foreign equipment in Russia is determined by the Russian Government Order
612. The Order (Law) of goods imported into Russia went into effect July 1,
1993. The requirements of this Order are associated with
.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gmcintu...@telect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 10:46 AM
To: 'Mark Schmidt'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
Mike,
I gotta stick up for the question and the discussion. This forum
One way to cut down on mail traffic would be not having to read this type of
discussion thread.
I know the reason I subscribed was based on content relating to both EMC and
Safety. This forum has been very helpful for establishing quality
engineering practices to enhance design, based on the
Dear Members,
In the EEC if I register a Class I Medical Device with a Competent Authority
in one Membered State, must I register with other Competent Authorities as
we eventually market product their State. All input is appreciated.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
X-Rite Incorporated
Grandville, MI
John,
Yes, The AC device falls into the scope of the LVD including the EMCD. This
must be tested at system level due to the leakage currents and the like. It
appears in this case the batteries require charging via the AC device, this
is a component of the system and must be tested accordingly.
Jim,
I forget where I procured this definition for Criteria B but if you abide by
this definition, it would indicate to me that Due Diligence was exercised
when testing your apparatus. 10 minutes however seems to be a bit long,
where does this constraint come from?
the apparatus shall continue
Eastern Japan Voltage 100 Vac @ 50Hz. (Tokyo, Kawasaki, Sapporo, Yokohoma
and Sebdai)
Western Japan Voltage 100 Vac @ 60Hz. (Osaka, Kyoto, Nagoya, Hiroshima)
I also agree with Tania and the brown-out conditions that exist in Japan.
It is my understanding that 90 Vac is quite common,
-
From: Mark Schmidt mschm...@xrite.com, on 11/4/99
9:45 AM:
Eastern Japan Voltage 100 Vac @ 50Hz. (Tokyo,
Kawasaki, Sapporo, Yokohoma and Sebdai)
Western Japan Voltage 100 Vac @ 60Hz. (Osaka, Kyoto,
Nagoya, Hiroshima)
I also agree with Tania and the brown-out conditions
that exist
it
would comment. It would be very much appreciated.
Someone out there must have been through this already.
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [SMTP:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 11:53 AM
To: Mark Schmidt
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE
Arthur,
I have been advised of this as well, my understanding was for all electronic
equipment.
The test standard is CISPR 22 effective Jan 01 2000.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Poolton [SMTP:arthur_pool...@eur.3com.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13
into hospital environment, then FCC requirements
should be considered since it is no longer a medical device.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com
Phone: (616) 257-2469
X-Rite Incorporated
Grandville, Michigan 49418
USA
Website - www.x-rite.com http://www.x-rite.com
Richard,
I agree.
Your definitions are very rational.
Regards,
Mark Schmidt
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com
Phone: (616) 257-2469
X-Rite Incorporated
3100 44th Street, S. W.
Grandville, Michigan 49418
USA
Website - www.x-rite.com http://www.x-rite.com
-Original Message
Dear Group,
I am passing this message along for a colleague of mine.
There is a position available for an EMC Engineer. They are located in
Farmington Hills, Michigan (nice area). They have an in house, EMC
facility and are looking for a qualified EMC Engineer to manage all
aspects of EMC
66 matches
Mail list logo