Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-21 Thread Brown, William
riday, September 07, 2012 11:45 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question One interpretation we received: National Measurement Office of the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (www.nmo.gov.uk) The recast RoHS Directive was published in the Official Jour

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-13 Thread Peter Tarver
> From: Ron Pickard [mailto:rpick...@equinoxpayments.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 09:30 > > Brian, > Further to Mark's reply, please note that compliance to > the recast RoHS Directive is to be indicated in a > product's DofC (Article 13) and CE marking (Article > 16). > > IMHO, a CE m

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread Brian Oconnell
Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 10:28 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question In message , dated Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Brian Oconnell writes: >Someone from the other side of the p

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread Chuck McDowell
: [PSES] RoHS Question They seem to be the UK body for OIML representation. Do not know what this has to do with enforcement of marking directives. Someone from the other side of the pond needs to explain to the colonists which organizations publish binding opinions. From the website with the URL

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread John Woodgate
In message , dated Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Brian Oconnell writes: Someone from the other side of the pond needs to explain to the colonists which organizations publish binding opinions. None, if you mean interpretative responses to questions. It's not legally permitted. Parliament writes the laws

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread Brian Oconnell
iginal Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Brown, William Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 8:45 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] RoHS Question One interpretation we received: National Measurement Office of the Department for Bu

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread Brown, William
echnology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 USA Mobile: (978) 727 7069 Desk: (978) 577 4205 Email: willbr...@tycoint.com From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:06 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question Nick

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread Crane, Lauren
authorities got wrong. Can you share the details or point to an article, etc... (this may read as defensive, but I am truly interested) Regards, Lauren Crane From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 5:28 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-07 Thread Anthony Thomson
ne, Lauren Sent: 09/06/12 07:13 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question A rep of the UK enforcement authority has said "yes" it would be seen as a non-conformity. All RoHS-logo's should be removed. I have a different view and the FAQ does not appear to ex

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Nick Williams
I don't have any clearer answer than those already been given by Lauren Crane and William Brown, but a couple of points occur which may be grist to the mill. Firstly, I suspect that the original intention of including wording in the Directive to restrict the use of other marks has, at least in

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Brown, William
om: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 14:14 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question A rep of the UK enforcement authority has said "yes" it would be seen as a non-conformity. All RoHS-logo's should be removed.

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Crane, Lauren
a logo be considered a non-conformity under the re-cast directive? Brian -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Crane, Lauren Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:33 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] RoHS Question The directive itse

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Brian Oconnell
directive? Brian -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Crane, Lauren Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:33 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] RoHS Question The directive itself does not address such fine point questions wel

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Mark Schmidt
limit (similar or equal to EU RoHS) but must be disclosed in the form of a disclosure table that ships with the product. Regards, Mark From: Ron Pickard [mailto:rpick...@equinoxpayments.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 12:30 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Kunde, Brian
That was most helpful. Thank you. From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Crane, Lauren Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 12:33 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] RoHS Question The directive itself does not address such fine point questions well, but

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread McInturff, Gary
equipment (EEE), cables and spare parts with a view to full compliance by 22nd July 2019 Gary From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:33 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question The directive itself does not address

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Crane, Lauren
. Regards, Lauren Crane From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:53 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] RoHS Question A few weeks ago we discussed if cables were included in the RoHS Directive. I would like to take this a step further

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Ron Pickard
STSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RoHS Question In both cases it is directed at electrical and electronic equipment. Mark From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]<mailto:[mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:53 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEE

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Bill Owsley
oHS Question In both cases it is directed at electrical and electronic equipment.   Mark   From:Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:53 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] RoHS Question   A few weeks ago we discussed if cables were

Re: [PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Mark Schmidt
In both cases it is directed at electrical and electronic equipment. Mark From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:53 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] RoHS Question A few weeks ago we discussed if cables were included in the RoHS

[PSES] RoHS Question

2012-09-06 Thread Kunde, Brian
A few weeks ago we discussed if cables were included in the RoHS Directive. I would like to take this a step further and ask if this directive applies to the non-electrical items that may be shipped with, used with, or bundled with an electronic device. For example, mouse pad, wrist pad, manual