Tony,
Has Consumer reports begun to EMC test products? Especially since it's only
recently that susceptible electronics have found their way into designs
Derek.
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
wi
In a message dated 3/3/99 7:55:28 AM Central Standard Time,
george.da...@unisys.com writes:
<< Derek:
If you do not have confidence in the product you are buying then select
another vendor. I understand your concern about products but I also
understand your perspective as a test laboratory own
...@unisys.com; rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Dave,
I see here that we hold a different opinion... My opinion is that when I buy
something I expect it to work. Perhaps with us all using windows this
Hi Derek
Sorry, but I feel compelled to provide another point of view-about US
products failing! I came to the US more than 30 years ago and quickly
subscribed to Consumer Reports, which I always use as a guide to buy just
about any appliance. Perhaps, as a consequence, I have had a totally
differe
Hello Everyone,
We in the medical laboratory industry had a January 2009 deadline for
compliance with the updated EN61326-1 standard, and parts thereof. What I'm
trying to find out though, is if there are other product categories in other
industries that also had/have a deadline for compliance t
Readers may be interested to know that the IEC committee responsible for
IEC60335 have proposed an addition to section 19 of IEC60335-1 which will
incorporate EMC performance tests into the standard for the first time.
For those not completely familiar it, IEC60335-1 is the general requirement
for
Please respond to Nick Williams
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:(bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Readers may be interested to know that the IEC committee responsible for
IEC60335 have proposed an addition to section 19 of
I am working from the EN implementation of the published standard
(BSEN60335-1:1995, including amendments 8913 (oct 95) 9475 (may 97) and
10168 (jan 99). According to anex NA, which lists the differences between
the BS document and the IEC original, CISPR 11 and CISPR 14 were
mentioned in the int
To: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US
cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
I am working from the EN implementation of the published standard
(BSEN60335-1:1995, including amendments 8913 (oct 95) 9475 (may 97) and
10168 (jan 99
Folks,
I posed the question of Immunity standards being enforced in the USA to Art
Whal(?) of the FCC. He did not see the need for immunity enforcement. After a
lengthy discussion I formed the opinion that it is most likely the FCC will
never press this issue, it will have to come from another STD
From: lfresea...@aol.com
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 13:11:30 EST
To: rehel...@mmm.com, n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Folks,
>
> I posed the question of Immunity standa
rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Folks,
I posed the question of Immunity standards being enforced in the USA
to Art
Whal(?) of the FCC. He did not see the
that type of equipment.
--
From: lfresea...@aol.com [SMTP:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:12 PM
To: rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements propose
Dave,
I see here that we hold a different opinion... My opinion is that when I buy
something I expect it to work. Perhaps with us all using windows this
expectation has slipped a little ( come on LINUX! ). As a consumer, immunity
testing is not a quality issue, it is a must.
I don't hold true to
.
Dave George
Unisys
-Original Message-
From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:12 PM
To: rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Folks,
I posed the question
<$0.02>
I just thought I'd add my two cents worth. It's sometimes all too easy to
forget WHY we perform these tests. While we are trying to comply with
written requirements in order to "pass", we are also trying to ensure
product
performance in the real world, which can be a very hostile place fro
Hi Scott.
You wrote:
< It's sometimes all too easy to forget WHY we perform these tests. While
we are trying to comply with written requirements in order to "pass", we
are also trying to ensure product
performance in the real world,>
Time for my favourite hobby horse again...
Going back even furt
Message-
> From: Chris Dupres [SMTP:chris_dup...@compuserve.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 6:29 PM
> To: Lacey,Scott
> Cc: emc-pstc
> Subject: RE: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
>
> Hi Scott.
>
> You wrote:
> < It's sometimes a
05:44:33 AM
Please respond to "Lacey,Scott"
To: Chris Dupres
cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org (bcc: Ravinder Ajmani/San Jose/IBM)
Subject: RE: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Chris
Not to beat a dead horse, but:
While your observations on the political side are very i
Ravinder,
Indeed, the IBM ESD furniture-type ESD simulator should be long remembered!
The purpose of this kind of test is equipment a customer will WANT to buy.
If we are wise, we go _beyond_ what the law requires, so we will gain the
trust of our customers. Often, management views tests such as
directives of course
Regards
Charlie
From: Andy Garcia [mailto:arg...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 07 May 2009 13:43
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] New EMC Requirements Deadlines for 2009
Hello Everyone,
We in the medical laboratory industry had a January 2009 deadline for
Hi All,
To CE mark a stand alone adaptor tested with resistive load, I don't
think it should be tested to IEC1000-4-8 & IEC1000-3-3, i.e. should
not include in the DoC, any comments?
Thanks and regards,
Roger
13 Sept 1999
-
Thi
22 matches
Mail list logo
