RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-07-01 Thread Price, Edward
cs EMC Is Our Specialty From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of david.cole...@selex-comms.com Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:07 AM To: Barker, Neil; 'Powell, Doug'; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject

RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-07-01 Thread david.coleman
e question as I did. Best Regards, Dave Coleman AIIRSM SELEX Communications "Barker, Neil" 01/07/2008 15:58 To "'Powell, Doug'" , david.cole...@selex-comms.com, emc-p...@ieee.org cc Subject RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41 Also, all DEF STANs

RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-07-01 Thread Barker, Neil
com/> P Consider the environment: do you really need to print this e mail? -Original Message- From: Powell, Doug [mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com] Sent: 30 June 2008 18:44 To: david.cole...@selex-comms.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: MIL-STD

RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-06-30 Thread Powell, Doug
All Mil-Stds are available at http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ -doug From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of david.cole...@selex-comms.com Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs. D

Rif: Re: MIL-STD 461 C

2003-06-12 Thread Paolo Peruzzi
thank you to everybody who replied me on the forum and off-list. Now I have the standard I was looking for. Paolo ** Paolo Peruzzi Esaote S.p.A. Research & Product Development - Design Quality Control via di Caciolle, 15 I- 50127 Florence te

Re: MIL-STD 461 C

2003-06-12 Thread Ken Javor
www.emccompliance.com on 6/12/03 9:26 AM, Paolo Peruzzi at paolo.peru...@esaote.com wrote: > > > > > > Dear group, > I would like to get the old broadband and narrowband RE limit tables of the > superseded MIL STD 461C, for teaching purposes. > Could anybody tell me where to find a pdf of t

RE: MIL-STD 461 C

2003-06-12 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: Paolo Peruzzi [ mailto:paolo.peru...@esaote.com] >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:27 AM >To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: MIL-STD 461 C > > > > > > > >Dear group, >I would like to get the old broadband and narrowband RE limit >tables of th

RE: mil-std-461/462 for download

2000-10-09 Thread Barry Ma
Quoted from http://www.conformity.com/shop/newsbreaks.html#need --- Need Help In Finding Copies Of MIL STD 461? Don’t ever say that you get nothing in return for all of your tax dollars. It’s now possible to obtain copies of MIL STD 461 E (the latest release) through the Internet at ht

RE: mil-std-461/462 for download

2000-10-09 Thread gcloutier
Paul, There is MIL-STD-461E and other MIL standards at this site. http://www.rbitem.com/emcstandards/northamerica/default.asp Gaston Cloutier telweb Inc. 350 rue Franquet, porte 45 Sainte-Foy, Quebec Canada G1P 4P3 Tel: 418-650-5516, poste: 217 Fax: 418-650-0860 Email: gclout...@telweb.com

RE: mil-std-461/462 for download

2000-10-09 Thread Gonzalez, Rocky (Kenneth P)
Paul, Try this page. http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ Rocky -)-(- -Original Message- From: Paul Slavens [mailto:paul_slav...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 11:21 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: mil-std-461/462 for download Dear Group, Where can I down

RE: MIL STD 461

2000-07-10 Thread Price, Ed
rg > Subject: RE: MIL STD 461 > > > > Derek, > This link worked for me. > http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ > > Rocky > -)-(- > > -Original Message- > From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com] > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2

RE: MIL STD 461

2000-07-07 Thread Gonzalez, Rocky (Kenneth P)
Derek, This link worked for me. http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ Rocky -)-(- -Original Message- From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:35 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: MIL STD 461 Hi, can anyone remind me where the MIL

Re: MIL-STD-461

2000-01-20 Thread Ken Javor
Go to www.emccompliance.com. Go to the EMC Info button on the top RHS of page. Both these PDF files are large! -- >From: kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com >To: emc-p...@ieee.org >Subject: MIL-STD-461 >Date: Wed, Jan 19, 2000, 11:40 PM > > > Dear all, > > Can someone help me ! I need the MIL-S

RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread ed . price
-) Ed From: "Brumbaugh, David" Subject: RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:02:10 -0800 To: 'emc-pstc' , "'ed.pr...@cubic.com'" > As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single > interface stand

Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread ed . price
From: Anthony Guinto Subject: Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:51:23 -0800 To: "Brumbaugh, David" , 'emc-pstc' > Hello > > Here is the basics on 461D > > MIL-STD-461 D > EMI > CE101 replaces CE01 &

RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread Brumbaugh, David
As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single interface standard. There is no plan to change the requirements or test methods unless there is a very compelling reason to do so. DB > All those still studying 461D/462D will be very happy to know that drafts of > 461E are

Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread ed . price
From: "Brumbaugh, David" Subject: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:34:44 -0800 To: 'emc-pstc' > Hi group, > Here's one for all of you that make products for US military/gov't > customers: > > I was reviewing MIL-STD-461D (I know, a little late t

Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-10 Thread Anthony Guinto
Hello Here is the basics on 461D MIL-STD-461 D EMI CE101 replaces CE01 CE102 up to 10MHz No Narrow or Wide band only Peak Band. CE03 test is gone CE07 test is gone CS101 replaces CS01 CS02 test is gone CS06 test is gone CS114 Bulk Current Injection is combo replacement of CS02 whole sprectrum &

Re: MIL-STD-461/462D, RE102, noisefloor

1997-05-12 Thread Pat Lawler
On Fri, 9 May 1997 08:34:50 +0200, you wrote: >When performing the emission test RE102 according to MIL-STD-461/462D we >observe that the test system noise floor is at some frequencies just >below the most stringent limit (navy mobile and army). This is when we >use the bandwidths prescribed by the

RE: MIL-STD-461/462D, RE102, noisefloor

1997-05-10 Thread ed . price
--- On Fri, 9 May 1997 08:34:50 +0200 "Heck, Stefan" wrote: >System requirements for RE102 > >When performing the emission test RE102 according to MIL-STD-461/462D we >observe that the test system noise floor is at some frequencies just >below the most stringent limit (navy mobile and army). T

Re: MIL-STD-461/462D, RE102, noisefloor

1997-05-09 Thread Robert Macy
cc: Heck, Stefan cc: emc-p...@ieee.org ST>From: "Heck, Stefan" ST>Subject: MIL-STD-461/462D, RE102, noisefloor ST>System requirements for RE102 ST>When performing the emission test RE102 according to MIL-STD-461/462D we ST>observe that the test system noise floor is at some frequencies just ST

RE: MIL-STD-461/462D, RE102, noisefloor

1997-05-09 Thread Frazee, Doug
Use a low-noise preamplifier or preselector with integral low noise preamp. Companies such as ASI or chesapeake microwave can help you out. You may want to start with the EMI receiver manufacturer. Doug Frazee EMC Compliance Engineer Alliant Techsystems, Inc. Advanced Technology Applications 401