I'm just trying to get clarification. Please advise.
>
> Best regards,
> Ron Pickard
> ron_pick...@hypercom.com
>
>
> __ Reply Separator
> _
> Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
> Author: "Peter Tarver" at I
>As a general rule, products powered from a (NEC, CEC)
>Class 2, (IEC) SELV, or battery power source need
>not be certified for safety. The general rule (e.g.,
>NEC, LVD, et al) exempts products operating at ELV,
>e.g., 50 volts or less.
Just a comment: one notable exception is patient-conne
; From: ron_pick...@hypercom.com [SMTP:ron_pick...@hypercom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 1:37 PM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re[2]: US NRTL required ?
>
> Hi Peter & Tania,
>
> "Require? No. Will they? Yes,". I'm intrigued. W
s status? :-)
I'm just trying to get clarification. Please advise.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron_pick...@hypercom.com
__ Reply Separator _________
Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
Author: "Peter Tarver" at INTERNET
List-Post
Hello from San Diego:
As a general rule, products powered from a (NEC, CEC)
Class 2, (IEC) SELV, or battery power source need
not be certified for safety. The general rule (e.g.,
NEC, LVD, et al) exempts products operating at ELV,
e.g., 50 volts or less.
(As near as I can tell, the NEC do
Require? No. Will they? Yes, under certain circumstances and certain
product categories, like ITE. Laptops for instance.
Peter L. Tarver
Nortel
ptar...@nt.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant, Tania (Tania) [SMTP:tgr...@lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 6:24 PM
>
> Thank
TP:tgr...@lucent.com]
> Reply To: Grant, Tania (Tania)
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 9:23 PM
> To: PSTC - articles; 'Peter Tarver'
> Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
>
> Thank you, Peter, for your clarification.
>
> You used the past tense below;--
, 1998 1:18 PM
To: PSTC - articles
Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
I just came across some typographical errors. My apologies.
Please refer
to the below for corrections in "<<>>".
Peter
-Original Message
I just came across some typographical errors. My apologies. Please refer
to the below for corrections in "<<>>".
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Tarver, Peter [MPK:4N02:EXCH]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 9:40 AM
In paragraph 1 -
For a lo
Is there then nothing that says
> that
> a battery operated product needs any third-party safety approvals ?
>
>
> Richard Payne
> Tektronix, Inc.
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Grant, Tania (Tania) [SMTP:tgr...@lucent.com]
rator _
Subject: RE: Re[2]: US NRTL required ?
Author: "Grant Tania (Tania)" at INTERNET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/17/98 6:23 PM
Ron,
I've lifted your questions from below and provided my response within <<
>>
lcos have been buying our equipment meeting UL1459 or UL1950, 3rd
edition.>>
--
From: ron_pick...@hypercom.com[SMTP:ron_pick...@hypercom.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 5:16 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: tgr...@lucent.com;
Hi Richard,
You raised this point (some additional thoughts of mine follow):
>Let me take this opportunity to present another point for anyone who
>cares to give it some thought.
>
>The NEC and/or local electrical requirements come into play because the
>product connects to the local el
age-
> From: Grant, Tania (Tania) [SMTP:tgr...@lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 11:37 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org; Payne, Richard
> Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
>
> Richard,
>
> The sections in the NEC you are looking for might be the following,
> in
sormatic.
> --
> From:
> richard.pa...@exgate.tek.com[SMTP:richard.pa...@exgate.tek.com]
> Reply To: richard.pa...@exgate.tek.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 9:38 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: US NRTL required ?
>
>
> Well I
Well I think this has been a good discussion. I must confess first that
there have been so many contributions that I have not been able to read them
all completely. But it seems that there is still a connection missing
(please correct me if I have missed something here), one which I Iooked into
a
16 matches
Mail list logo
