Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and other topics from a EMC(LinuxCNC) newbie (TheNewbie)

2012-04-23 Thread Chris Morley
I was searching the web and came across this paper: about nurbs planning including s curve acceleration. www.cadanda.com/CAD_4_1-4__34.PDF Above my pay grade but interesting. I was also thinking it would be interesting to discuss the frame work of a linuxcnc3. Is it useful to start clean on e

Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and other topics from a EMC(LinuxCNC) newbie (TheNewbie)

2012-04-23 Thread Steve Blackmore
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:01:30 +0100, you wrote: >On 23 April 2012 01:31, Steve Blackmore wrote: > >> What the f^^^ is ja3? > >It isn't really of much relevance to the general user at the moment, >but it is a development branch in which there is no longer an explicit >link between "axes" and "joint

Re: [Emc-users] axis-remote issues

2012-04-23 Thread Dewey Garrett
A work around for this (or at least a similar problem occuring with Ubuntu 10.04 and tk8.5) was incorporated in axis (v2.5 or later): http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commit;h=e863002919cd1fc0c8395abbe29fcec14e5c1cae You can also try the shell commands directly as: $ xhost -S

Re: [Emc-users] axis-remote issues

2012-04-23 Thread andy pugh
On 23 April 2012 19:22, Les Newell wrote: > X server insecure (must use xauth-style authorization); command ignored > > Has anyone else come across this and if so, how did you get around it? It looks like Michael Haberler has had the problem, and fixed it: http://code.google.com/p/heekscnc/sourc

[Emc-users] axis-remote issues

2012-04-23 Thread Les Newell
I am trying to use axis-remote and get the following error when I try to send a command to Axis: emc@emc-desktop:~$ axis-remote --reload X server insecure (must use xauth-style authorization); command ignored Has anyone else come across this and if so, how did you get around it? Les --

Re: [Emc-users] Fixed Dwell

2012-04-23 Thread gene heskett
On Monday, April 23, 2012 01:54:59 PM dave did opine: > > >> > > >> Viesturs > > G4 P > > is meant to delay movement while the spindle gets up to speed. > > Dave Which works fine Dave, BUT must be written into every piece of code that will be executed. Far better IMO to configure linuxcnc,

Re: [Emc-users] Fixed Dwell

2012-04-23 Thread dave
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:25:26 +0100 Mike Bennett wrote: > Hi > > I'm nearing the end of building a DIY gantry router. The router I'm > using has soft start, so takes several seconds to come up to speed. > I realise I could add dwell commands to the G-Code, but is it > possible to add a fixed dwe

Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and other topics from a EMC(LinuxCNC) newbie (TheNewbie)

2012-04-23 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 4/23/2012 2:24 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: > let's discuss terminology for a minute (paths vs gcode segments) > > we have: > 1. linear G-code programs (no oword control structures) > 2. G-code with arbitrary control structures > 3. Some other yet-to-be-invented language for machine control. > >

Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and other topics from a EMC(LinuxCNC) newbie (TheNewbie)

2012-04-23 Thread andy pugh
On 23 April 2012 01:31, Steve Blackmore wrote: > What the f^^^ is ja3? It isn't really of much relevance to the general user at the moment, but it is a development branch in which there is no longer an explicit link between "axes" and "joints". There are places in the current software where ther

Re: [Emc-users] LinuxCNC & Sandybridge

2012-04-23 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/22/2012 11:25 PM, Karl Schmidt wrote: > On 04/21/2012 09:37 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> Never mind...I chroot'd into the LinuxCNC Ubuntu install from a >> parallel Debian wheezy installation, which allowed me to grab >> build-essentials a

Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and other topics from a EMC(LinuxCNC) newbie (TheNewbie)

2012-04-23 Thread Steve Blackmore
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:05:17 +0300, you wrote: >2012/4/23 Steve Blackmore : >> >> What is ja3? > >Joints_axes3 branch in master git repository. > >> Is it any wonder that Joe Public has such a poor >> opinion of EMC/LinuxCNC!! - I've been here 4 years and you've yet to >> convince me it's not a cl