Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Sat, May 26, 2018, 06:47 andy pugh wrote: > On 25 May 2018 at 13:47, jeremy youngs wrote: > > >> I have no idea what it is, I may just find out today . > > It definitely looks like an Optek logo, part number and date code > >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Sat, May 26, 2018, 08:04 Bengt Sjölund wrote: > I have used ITR8307 succesfully. > http://www.93x57r.se/tecno-cnc/images/CNC3000/opto%20sp-speed%202.jpg > http://www.everlight.com/file/ProductFile/ITR8307.pdf > > > You are suggesting replacing the opto'd with this ? That

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

a bit of a learning > curve. > This was excellent advice thank you > > -- Ralph > > From: jeremy youngs [jcyoung...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 8:48 PM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > Subject: Re: [Emc-users]

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

I have used ITR8307 succesfully. http://www.93x57r.se/tecno-cnc/images/CNC3000/opto%20sp-speed%202.jpg http://www.everlight.com/file/ProductFile/ITR8307.pdf Den 2018-05-26 kl. 13:46, skrev andy pugh: On 25 May 2018 at 13:47, jeremy youngs wrote: I have no idea what it

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 25 May 2018 at 13:47, jeremy youngs wrote: >> I have no idea what it is, I may just find out today . It definitely looks like an Optek logo, part number and date code https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/reflective-optical-sensors/6424301/ -- atp "A motorcycle is a

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 05/24/2018 11:01 PM, jeremy youngs wrote: I would suspect a Julian date code of day of the year i.e 264 then a year specifier , i.e. 2649 being the 264 day in the 9 the year of decade VERY few electronic manufacturers use this system. Almost universal is either YYWW or WWYY in the

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Fri, May 25, 2018, 03:24 andy pugh wrote: > On 25 May 2018 at 03:08, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > 8950.jpg > > < > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l1S6QMRvlKNLQNbT9GYOcLkHmogDqKEr/view?usp=drivesdk > > > > This is what I got. > > I see an OPB number

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 25 May 2018 at 03:08, jeremy youngs wrote: > 8950.jpg > > This is what I got. I see an OPB number there too, and OPB seems to be a family of optos. (though I can't find that one) Is

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Friday 25 May 2018 01:04:36 jeremy youngs wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018, 23:45 Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 24 May 2018 21:58:31 jeremy youngs wrote: > > > Sorry, autocorrect, > > > > > > Heds 8950 encoder > > > > Its not an Omron then? I have used one before, in

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thu, May 24, 2018, 23:45 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 24 May 2018 21:58:31 jeremy youngs wrote: > > > Sorry, autocorrect, > > > > Heds 8950 encoder > > Its not an Omron then? I have used one before, in a project for the tv > station, never gave a hint of trouble.

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

gt; > > From: jeremy youngs [jcyoung...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 9:01 PM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc > > On Thu, May 24, 2018, 22:32 Ralph Stirling <ralph.stirl

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thursday 24 May 2018 21:58:31 jeremy youngs wrote: > Sorry, autocorrect, > > Heds 8950 encoder Its not an Omron then? I have used one before, in a project for the tv station, never gave a hint of trouble. But I know nothing about a HED 8950. I'll see if I can find something about it on the

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

oder, because that module doesn't look like the standard HP/Avago type. -- Ralph From: jeremy youngs [jcyoung...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 9:01 PM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc On Thu, May 24

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thu, May 24, 2018, 22:32 Ralph Stirling wrote: > I suspect that module was manufactured in the 50th week of 1989, as 8950 > looks like a date code. I don't see a normal part number, unless it is the > OPB number. > I would suspect a Julian date code of day of

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

I suspect that module was manufactured in the 50th week of 1989, as 8950 looks like a date code. I don't see a normal part number, unless it is the OPB number. -- Ralph On May 24, 2018 7:09 PM, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > > HEDS 8950? > > That seems to be an alignment

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

> > > > HEDS 8950? > > That seems to be an alignment tool, not an encoder... > > The optical encoder says 8950 I found a datasheet that said obsolete in > Nov 2011 > > > > 8950.jpg This is what I got. Also

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 05/24/2018 07:57 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 24 May 2018 16:52:17 jeremy youngs wrote: Ok, I got this all loaded , got some help from Peter and am able to drop these pins to ground and watch encoder raw count show pin activity. So , great everything works, very Happy. The bad I

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Sorry, autocorrect, > Heds 8950 encoder > The 7i42TA's are that. Limiting the current to a value below the failure > of the gates in the fpga on the 7i90HD. IF you are feeding them 5 > volts. > > What diode are you referring to? > The led that drives the optical encoder. It does not pass a

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thursday 24 May 2018 16:52:17 jeremy youngs wrote: > Ok, I got this all loaded , got some help from Peter and am able to > drop these pins to ground and watch encoder raw count show pin > activity. So , great everything works, very Happy. The bad I > think I reverse biased this led and

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 24 May 2018 at 21:52, jeremy youngs wrote: > The real question, this is a heads 8950 and it shows eol as Nov > 2011 and I cannot locate a source for a replacement. HEDS 8950? That seems to be an alignment tool, not an encoder... -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Ok, I got this all loaded , got some help from Peter and am able to drop these pins to ground and watch encoder raw count show pin activity. So , great everything works, very Happy. The bad I think I reverse biased this led and popped it. I have another encoder and motor to try to read counts

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thu, May 24, 2018, 01:36 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Sounds like no threads running. > > Does a "halrun" execute,(see the doc pdf, about page 585) and give you > a "halcmd" prompt? Or alternatively, does linuxcnc actually run? Yes,yes The > > first time it will ask you

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 24 May 2018 at 02:33, jeremy youngs wrote: > Pin 1 and 3 are my a and b from the 7i42. > I have verified encoder is operational and 4.56 volts at pins 1&2 on 7i42 > so all seems good there. I'm pretty sure this is a syntax problem . Input ? > hal.jpg >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 23:48:23 jeremy youngs wrote: > Halmeter has blanked fields and inoperable buttons, so I cannot select > pins. Halscope shows no active threads. So I cannot continue as the > Hal tutorial shows. > nothread.jpg >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 8:48 PM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc Halmeter has blanked fields and inoperable buttons, so I cannot select pins. Halscope shows no active threads. So I cannot continue as the Hal tutorial shows.

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Halmeter has blanked fields and inoperable buttons, so I cannot select pins. Halscope shows no active threads. So I cannot continue as the Hal tutorial shows. nothread.jpg

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 21:33:40 jeremy youngs wrote: > Pin 1 and 3 are my a and b from the 7i42. > I have verified encoder is operational and 4.56 volts at pins 1&2 on > 7i42 so all seems good there. I'm pretty sure this is a syntax problem > . Input ? hal.jpg >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 20:23:24 andy pugh wrote: > On 23 May 2018 at 23:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I can't see anything but what looks like cast iron behind the > > pulley. > > Ah, I see, > > The designers at Holbrook seemed to have decided that the first idler > gear

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Pin 1 and 3 are my a and b from the 7i42. I have verified encoder is operational and 4.56 volts at pins 1&2 on 7i42 so all seems good there. I'm pretty sure this is a syntax problem . Input ? hal.jpg

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 23 May 2018 at 23:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > I can't see anything but what looks like cast iron behind the pulley. Ah, I see, The designers at Holbrook seemed to have decided that the first idler gear under the spindle needed at least a 1.5" shaft, and then made it 1

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 14:20:39 Andy Pugh wrote: > > On 23 May 2018, at 17:38, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > Surely that lower pulley is not on the encoder shaft? > > What leads you to doubt it? > I can't see anything but what looks like cast iron behind the pulley. But

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

> On 23 May 2018, at 17:38, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Surely that lower pulley is not on the encoder shaft? What leads you to doubt it? -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 11:42:55 andy pugh wrote: > On 23 May 2018 at 15:39, Gene Heskett wrote: > > True Andy, but I haven't searched for teeny toothed belts to see > > whats available. The 10mm wide stuff I'm familiar with is so stiff > > that it takes 5 lbs of preload

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 23 May 2018 at 15:39, Gene Heskett wrote: > True Andy, but I haven't searched for teeny toothed belts to see whats > available. The 10mm wide stuff I'm familiar with is so stiff that it > takes 5 lbs of preload just to bend it around a 20 tooth pulley. There are 2.5mm

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 06:24:24 andy pugh wrote: > On 23 May 2018 at 10:53, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Any of that 'style' of encoder > > will last longer if a separately supported shaft is driven and can > > absorb the belt tension. > > The belt tension can be very low if

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 23 May 2018 at 10:53, Gene Heskett wrote: > Any of that 'style' of encoder > will last longer if a separately supported shaft is driven and can > absorb the belt tension. The belt tension can be very low if driving only an encoder. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wednesday 23 May 2018 04:44:21 andy pugh wrote: > On 23 May 2018 at 01:36, jeremy youngs wrote: > > I have to purchase an encoder for my spindle motor, I'm thinking a > > 256 count should suffice , spindle is 1:1 belt driven , is there any > > reason I should choose a

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 23 May 2018 at 01:36, jeremy youngs wrote: > I have to purchase an encoder for my spindle motor, I'm thinking a 256 > count should suffice , spindle is 1:1 belt driven , is there any reason I > should choose a higher count? Not really, I did tapping and gear hobbing

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Tuesday 22 May 2018 23:10:24 jeremy youngs wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018, 20:53 Gene Heskett wrote: > > Ouch, unless its a timing belt, otherwise there will be slippage, > > making the scale more of a SWAG than accurate. > > Yes, 1 inch wide xl 037 > > > That, and the

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Tue, May 22, 2018, 20:53 Gene Heskett wrote: > > Ouch, unless its a timing belt, otherwise there will be slippage, making > the scale more of a SWAG than accurate. Yes, 1 inch wide xl 037 That, and the fact that I wasn't aware the encoders > output was differential,

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Tuesday 22 May 2018 20:36:45 jeremy youngs wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018, 18:05 andy pugh wrote: > > halrun > > > > loadrt hostmot2 > > loadrt hm2_7i90 ... and the rest of the line ... > > > > loadrt threads > > addf hm2_7i90.read thread1 > > addf hm2_7i90.write thread1 >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Tue, May 22, 2018, 18:05 andy pugh wrote: > > halrun > > loadrt hostmot2 > loadrt hm2_7i90 ... and the rest of the line ... > > loadrt threads > addf hm2_7i90.read thread1 > addf hm2_7i90.write thread1 > start > > setp hm2_7i90.0.pwmgen.00.value 1 (use tab completion, I am

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 22 May 2018 at 21:54, jeremy youngs wrote: > The question is how do I go about bench testing this system? I would like > to verify pwm outputs before I connect hardware . You can run HAL from the command line (I do this a lot when testing). Halrun starts a HAL session,

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

7i42 in hand, 7i90 configuration built. Linuxcnc starts, and no real time error , that's awesome. 50 pin cables and connectors assembled. All hooked up, all power on. Mesaflash readhm2id gives all pins and their assignment. So I presume that is all as it should be. I printed a copy if this

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

1 7i42 ordered, will get 2 more soon, Hal tutorial in dead tree, I will work on the i.d of these renco encoders and connect them next week when 7i42 gets here. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc From the forum PCW replied the topic: 7i90 questions A couple things Do you really have two loadrt hm2_7i90 lines in your hal file? that wont work also you cannot specify firmware for a 7I90 (or most newer mesa cards

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

>From the forum PCW replied the topic: 7i90 questions A couple things Do you really have two loadrt hm2_7i90 lines in your hal file? that wont work also you cannot specify firmware for a 7I90 (or most newer mesa cards) since the configuration is preloaded in flash memory loadrt hostmot2 loadrt

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Manual in hand, trying this, and I'm here. svts.jpg How do I get access to this extracted bitfile? -- Check out the vibrant tech

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Emc-users mailing list

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

First order of business is probably the mesaflash session. Get, from the mesanet site, 7i90.zip. I unziped it to the Public subdir in my home directory, which will give you a 7i90 directory. cd 7i90/configs/hostmot2$, and an ls will show you quite a lengthy list of files. There ought to be a

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc what file, .jpg <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZM55GJZASGHNSLz2djIoe7t5WuQm7NtJ/view?usp=drivesdk> 1st is transport layer. Second is trying to get 7i9) bit file loaded. The path is correct and the file is in that

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thursday 10 May 2018 21:32:24 jeremy youngs wrote: > what file, .jpg > w?usp=drivesdk> 1st is transport layer. Second is trying to get 7i9) > bit file loaded. The path is correct and the file is in that location. > Any

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

what file, .jpg 1st is transport layer. Second is trying to get 7i9) bit file loaded. The path is correct and the file is in that location. Any suggestions?

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Yahoo, Yahoo !!! success.jpg Thank you so much guys !! Now if I'm correct the next thing will be mesaflash the firmware version, then on to building cables and count these encoders so I have good

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 9 May 2018 at 21:30, jeremy youngs wrote: >> Why do you have that in the config string? >> It was what remained . Get rid of all of it ? Get rid of the bits that are wrong, keep the bits that are right. Or you can just omit the whole config="..." and that should

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wed, May 9, 2018, 13:57 andy pugh wrote: > On 9 May 2018 at 19:51, jeremy youngs wrote: > > [ 373.897822] hm2/hm2_7i90.0: invalid token in config string: "hm2/7i90" > > Why do you have that in the config string? > It was what remained . Get rid of

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 9 May 2018 at 19:51, jeremy youngs wrote: [ 373.897822] hm2/hm2_7i90.0: invalid token in config string: "hm2/7i90" Why do you have that in the config string? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Print file information: RUN_IN_PLACE=no LINUXCNC_DIR= LINUXCNC_BIN_DIR=/usr/bin LINUXCNC_TCL_DIR=/usr/lib/tcltk/linuxcnc LINUXCNC_SCRIPT_DIR= LINUXCNC_RTLIB_DIR=/usr/realtime-3.4-9-rtai-686-pae/modules/linuxcnc LINUXCNC_CONFIG_DIR= LINUXCNC_LANG_DIR=/usr/share/linuxcnc/tcl/msgs INIVAR=inivar

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 9 May 2018 at 14:29, jeremy youngs wrote: > loadrt hm2_7i90 ioaddr=0378 config="board_eth..." > config="firmware=hm2/7i90/SV12.BIT num_encoders=4 num_pwmgens=4 > num_stepgens=0" Gives the error: [ 633.637130] hm2_7i90: `0378' invalid for parameter `ioaddr' Should be

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

# Generated by PNCconf at Sat May 5 20:23:27 2018 # If you make changes to this file, they will be # overwritten when you run PNCconf again loadrt trivkins loadrt [EMCMOT]EMCMOT servo_period_nsec=[EMCMOT]SERVO_PERIOD num_joints=[TRAJ]AXES loadrt hostmot2 loadrt hm2_7i90 ioaddr=0378

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wed, May 9, 2018, 07:53 andy pugh wrote: > On 9 May 2018 at 13:36, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > Should this not define a epp io address? As that is my intended > > communication protocol. > > Oh. That means that all my advice has been wrong so far :-)

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 9 May 2018 at 13:36, jeremy youngs wrote: > Should this not define a epp io address? As that is my intended > communication protocol. Oh. That means that all my advice has been wrong so far :-) I was confusing the 7i90 with the 7i80 (I think) You need loadrt hm2_7i90

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wed, May 9, 2018, 04:21 andy pugh wrote: > On 9 May 2018 at 03:03, jeremy youngs wrote: > > >>> Change hm2_pci to hm2_eth, and add a "board_ip=..." > Should this not define a epp io address? As that is my intended communication protocol. > No. It

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 9 May 2018 at 03:03, jeremy youngs wrote: >>> Change hm2_pci to hm2_eth, and add a "board_ip=..." parameter >>> Tweak the config files until there are no errors and LinuxCNC starts. >>> >> Like the attachment shows ? No. It needs to be "board_ip" and have the actual IP

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

> > . > >> >> Use PnCConfo to create a set of HAL, INI and other files, then work on >> those files directly. >> > Done, verified linuxcnc start up before editing . >> >> Change hm2_pci to hm2_eth, and add a "board_ip=..." parameter >> Tweak the config files until there are no errors and LinuxCNC

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Mon, May 7, 2018, 10:13 andy pugh wrote: > On 6 May 2018 at 15:15, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > I copied and pasted the Hal file to the custom Hal file . And used find > and > > replace all 5i20 to 7i90 in both Hal files and saved. I started this > >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 6 May 2018 at 15:15, jeremy youngs wrote: > I copied and pasted the Hal file to the custom Hal file . And used find and > replace all 5i20 to 7i90 in both Hal files and saved. I started this > configuration and it errored, I don't understand what you mean, or what you

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

And back to this , I copied and pasted the Hal file to the custom Hal file . And used find and replace all 5i20 to 7i90 in both Hal files and saved. I started this configuration and it errored, I figured due to the Hal file. I can't get it to save the print log to send it here. I'm wondering if I

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

2.7.12 loaded, relevant fields filled out accurately, pncconfig operates normally for modifying configuration. It just works. Correcting all the files to 7i90 and mesaflash next . Dead tree volume of 7i90 manual in hand , a copy of lcnc docs in the works. Thank you guys. I hope to be reading

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 20:38 andy pugh wrote: > On 5 May 2018 at 02:22, jeremy youngs wrote: > > Ok, I'm presuming 2.7.12 is master. I reinstalled 2.7.11. > > No, 2.8 is master. > > 2.7.12 is the latest stable release and you should use it. > Why

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 5 May 2018 at 02:22, jeremy youngs wrote: > Ok, I'm presuming 2.7.12 is master. I reinstalled 2.7.11. No, 2.8 is master. 2.7.12 is the latest stable release and you should use it. > I was able to get a configuration together, and get it to post desktop > icons. Of

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Ok, I'm presuming 2.7.12 is master. I reinstalled 2.7.11. I was able to get a configuration together, and get it to post desktop icons. Of course there is no relevant information in this file. When I went back to edit it with good motor control number I hit the same roadblock. Reinstalled again.

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 18:34 andy pugh wrote: > On 5 May 2018 at 00:11, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > Was 7i90 being in the drop down menu one of them? I.e. did you have to > lie > > to it or was it there? > > No, I lied in just the same way as you did. > >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 5 May 2018 at 00:11, jeremy youngs wrote: > Was 7i90 being in the drop down menu one of them? I.e. did you have to lie > to it or was it there? No, I lied in just the same way as you did. Really, if PnCCOnf couldn't make a config for the oldest of the Mesa cards (5i20)

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 15:06 andy pugh wrote: > On 4 May 2018 at 20:20, jeremy youngs wrote: > > Should I update tonight? > > I doubt that is it. > > Though the changelog does mention some minor pncconf changes. > Was 7i90 being in the drop down menu

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 4 May 2018 at 20:20, jeremy youngs wrote: > Should I update tonight? I doubt that is it. Though the changelog does mention some minor pncconf changes. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Should I update tonight? -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Emc-users mailing list

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

2.7.11 On Fri, May 4, 2018, 13:30 andy pugh wrote: > On 4 May 2018 at 14:22, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oCic3xsdgiQHYg9IyPJqEjxzoGNi5GuX/view?usp=drivesdk > > > > >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 4 May 2018 at 14:22, jeremy youngs wrote: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oCic3xsdgiQHYg9IyPJqEjxzoGNi5GuX/view?usp=drivesdk > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JMsrhOeEC5bVlChI04ptt8WY7KABXFlg/view?usp=drivesdk > >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

> PnCConf doesn't access hardware, so doesn't care. > > For clarification, Dell optiplex 620, motherboard parport, can show pin , > can invoke mesaflash. That's as far in as I can get at this moment. > I have the 7i90 bit files in the public folder of the home directory. Is mesaflash my next

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 4 May 2018 at 17:55, Gene Heskett wrote: > Andy, if he's on the pi doing this, pncconf does not yet work. > > Particularly, and I haven't seen a msg go by that he has mesaflashed the > 7i90HD from the parport of an x86 machine, PnCConf doesn't access hardware, so

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Friday 04 May 2018 09:22:44 jeremy youngs wrote: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oCic3xsdgiQHYg9IyPJqEjxzoGNi5GuX/view >?usp=drivesdk > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JMsrhOeEC5bVlChI04ptt8WY7KABXFlg/view >?usp=drivesdk > >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oCic3xsdgiQHYg9IyPJqEjxzoGNi5GuX/view?usp=drivesdk https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JMsrhOeEC5bVlChI04ptt8WY7KABXFlg/view?usp=drivesdk https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J02OQ2lxB9bpsR17oPyOgbWSHfwmvlar/view?usp=drivesdk

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 07:59 andy pugh wrote: > On 4 May 2018 at 13:36, jeremy youngs wrote: > > >> In this page: > >> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/config/pncconf.html#_mesa_i_o_setup > >> > >> What do you have? > > > > I'm not sure I understand

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 4 May 2018 at 13:36, jeremy youngs wrote: >> In this page: >> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/config/pncconf.html#_mesa_i_o_setup >> >> What do you have? > > I'm not sure I understand this question Can you show us a screenshot of the IO connector page? (You can

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 05:05 andy pugh wrote: > On 4 May 2018 at 03:29, jeremy youngs wrote: > > >> I get this message no matter what I tell pnc it is. 5i25,7i43 etc . All > >> give me the same you haven forgot to assign pwm/ step to x,y,z, axis. > > Have

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 4 May 2018 at 03:29, jeremy youngs wrote: >> I get this message no matter what I tell pnc it is. 5i25,7i43 etc . All >> give me the same you haven forgot to assign pwm/ step to x,y,z, axis. Have you actually assigned a stepper or pwm to each axis? In this page:

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Ok, so much for links. Ok, called Peter today, got a bit of help and syntax to get these pins to show, got that accomplished, git mesaflash installed, verified invocation in terminal. I get this message no matter what I tell pnc it is. 5i25,7i43 etc . All give me the same you haven forgot to

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Thu, May 3, 2018, 21:13 jeremy youngs wrote: > Ok, called Peter today, got a bit of help and syntax to get these pins to > show, got that accomplished, git mesaflash installed, verified invocation > in terminal. > I get this message no matter what I tell pnc it is.

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Negative, it's what I got when I invoked the kernel log command, those would be what has been stored since last update 3 months ago. I will clear it and do kernel log later this evening, right now I got 2 guys wrenching in my shop so I'm trying to get them out. You should also know I have had

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 26 April 2018 at 01:35, jeremy youngs wrote: > 3.49 rtai 686 OK, I think that sends output to dmesg. Was that output you listed the stuff that was printed _while_ you did the HAL commands in a different terminal? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

3.49 rtai 686 On Apr 25, 2018 7:13 PM, "andy pugh" wrote: On 26 April 2018 at 00:31, jeremy youngs wrote: > Apr 25 19:12:57 taurus kernel: [ 189.591226] FAT-fs (sdb1): utf8 is > not a recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be >

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 26 April 2018 at 00:31, jeremy youngs wrote: > Apr 25 19:12:57 taurus kernel: [ 189.591226] FAT-fs (sdb1): utf8 is > not a recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be > case sensitive! No messages about the 7i90 there either. I am, basically,

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

jeremy@taurus:~$ sudo tail -f /var/log/kern.log [sudo] password for jeremy: Apr 25 19:10:13 taurus kernel: [ 25.871130] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized Apr 25 19:10:13 taurus kernel: [ 25.871141] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized Apr 25 19:10:13 taurus kernel: [ 25.876929]

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 25 April 2018 at 23:33, jeremy youngs wrote: > Kernel log doesn't appear during tab completion, through the whole statement I have a linux machine available now. It is: sudo tail -f /var/log/kern.log -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 25 April 2018 at 23:27, jeremy youngs wrote: > went through terminal > edit of network manager, on attempting to open the network manager file it > errored. It's interesting too. > Glib-critical **: g_str_has_prefix: assertion 'str != Null' failed > Obviously I'm not a

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Kernel log doesn't appear during tab completion, through the whole statement On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 17:27 jeremy youngs wrote: > Back at this for a moment. Received the think penguin and attempted to > configure. No avail. Checked think penguin support, went through

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

Back at this for a moment. Received the think penguin and attempted to configure. No avail. Checked think penguin support, went through terminal edit of network manager, on attempting to open the network manager file it errored. It's interesting too. Glib-critical **: g_str_has_prefix: assertion

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 12:33 andy pugh wrote: > On 25 April 2018 at 18:03, jeremy youngs wrote: > > > https://forum.linuxcnc.org/27-driver-boards/32321-7i90-questions?start=20 > > What is a non null string ? > > I fixed that. I am hoping that it isn't

Re: [Emc-users] 7i90 not listed in pnc

On 25 April 2018 at 18:03, jeremy youngs wrote: > https://forum.linuxcnc.org/27-driver-boards/32321-7i90-questions?start=20 > What is a non null string ? I fixed that. I am hoping that it isn't the "fix" which is causing your problems. > Kernel.lig comes back > No such

  1   2   >