Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

Good idea. > OK, I think I understand the mechanics better but still, there is always > the option to write g-code using the machines native coordinates and have > LinuxCNC use the more common "trivial" kinematics that is used with most > milling machines. Get this to work first even if the

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

OK, I think I understand the mechanics better but still, there is always the option to write g-code using the machines native coordinates and have LinuxCNC use the more common "trivial" kinematics that is used with most milling machines. Get this to work first even if the goal is to work in

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

> So your machine can access any point along a specific diameter cylinder? > I'm curious about what the machine does. > I would start out using trivial kinematics. Why use (X,Y,Z) in the g-code > if the machine can not possibly move in (x,y,z) space? > The device is a coping tool for wood. I

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

So your machine can access any point along a specific diameter cylinder? I'm curious about what the machine does. But the kinematics could be literally trivial. How to do this depends on what you want your g-code to look like. You can always write the g-code using native machine coordinates

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

hi Nicklas: I think you keep the X as linear and do a Cartesian to polar conversion for the Y. This is sometimes done to get a really stiff Y axis. Years ago I saw a utube of a shop doing one with a decently large rotary table; as in 18" or more. Dave On 2/22/20 12:50 AM, Nicklas Karlsson

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

Did not find list of kinematics module but. Do not think this kind of kinematics module exist, scara however come close and so could be a good starting point. > > No attached drawing. > > Trying to attach smaller version of drawing: > > > > If it doesn’t work, see here: >

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

On Friday 21 February 2020 17:27:05 Thaddeus Waldner wrote: > > No attached drawing. > > Trying to attach smaller version of drawing: > > > > If it doesn’t work, see here: > https://1drv.ms/u/s!AmALSPKTMQBkwTRPcAo195PaFmAh > Is a blank page

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

> No attached drawing. Trying to attach smaller version of drawing: If it doesn’t work, see here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AmALSPKTMQBkwTRPcAo195PaFmAh This does have one rotary axis and one linear axis so I’m pretty sure that simply setting the

Re: [Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

> I am working on a design for a small custom 2-axis machine with 2 joints. > Joint 0 is linear and oriented in the Y direction. Joint 1 is rotary and > mounted on Y. See attached drawing. No attached drawing. > My question is, would I be best off creating a new kinematics module for this >

[Emc-users] Kinematics, headless CNC

I am working on a design for a small custom 2-axis machine with 2 joints. Joint 0 is linear and oriented in the Y direction. Joint 1 is rotary and mounted on Y. See attached drawing. My question is, would I be best off creating a new kinematics module for this machine, or can I simply reuse