Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-23 Thread Peter Blodow
Hello gentlemen, some 20 years ago I made some experiments with a DC-controlled adjustable inductor like that, we called it a varactor. Three of them were used in a large stabilized three-phase mains supply powered by giant vacuum tubes (50 to 100 kW or so). Those varactors were three legged ir

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Dave
Wow.. If you look closely it appears he has at least a couple of different taps on that transformer also! Dave On 11/22/2010 10:31 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote: >> Perhaps you have a bad welding lead connection/bad ground or the voltage >> output is too low? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dave >> > I don

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Kirk Wallace
> Perhaps you have a bad welding lead connection/bad ground or the voltage > output is too low? > > Thanks, > > Dave I don't know what's wrong, it just not working quite right: http://www.bunkerofdoom.com/00_misc/welder/index.html (My hat's off to them, they're making do with what they have a

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Dave
>>A single turn, or rather 3/4 turn, is fine. Good to know.. I will swap it out for a single turn. >>One problem I have had recently is that I can start an arc easily, but I get a shower of small arcs and no heat. On the third or >>fourth start, I finally get a coherent hot spark. Sounds lik

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:07 -0500, Dave wrote: > Is a single turn pot ok or does it really need to be a ten turn or > whatever it is? A single turn, or rather 3/4 turn, is fine. I just put the ten turn knob on the replacement to keep from losing it. This potentiometer sets the range that the remo

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Dave
Is a single turn pot ok or does it really need to be a ten turn or whatever it is? Most of the welder I know are very "seat of the pants type" of guys. I seriously doubt if they ever look at the meters. Not hot enough turn it up. Too hot.. turn it down. Can't get it hot enough.. get a dif

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:57 -0500, Dave wrote: ... snip > I have a Hobart Cyber-TIG also. It works but the current control pot > on the front needs to be replaced as it is flaky. I replaced mine with a temporary single turn potentiometer. The original was intermittent so I took it apart: http:/

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Dave
I've seen something similar in Mig welders also.. although they are suppose to be constant voltage while TIG and stick is suppose to be constant current. I have a Hobart Cyber-TIG also. It works but the current control pot on the front needs to be replaced as it is flaky. I have the single

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Andy Pugh
On 22 November 2010 11:57, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > there should be a market for wireless temperature/humidity >> sensors for managing piles. > > I see it now, a colour bar graph, ending with a flashing red "PILE CRITICAL" > display when it's about to catch fire. :-) > It's a good thing I'm

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-22 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:40:25PM -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote: > > This is like another idea I have had. I have large compost piles that I > use to process garden and kitchen waste. The piles can be controlled by > monitoring temperature and adding green material, water and turning the > pile. I sh

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-21 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:22 +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: ... snip > Though I've only heard of them in whispers from prehistory, SX1 looks a > lot like a magnetic amplifier. ... snip Gene mentioned magnetic amplifiers. I'll need to check this out. Thanks. > > One of my problems is that I can't

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-21 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:14:05PM -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 21:27 +, Leslie Newell wrote: > > Yes it does sound like a variable reactor setup. The control signal is > > DC and pushes the core into saturation, reducing it's inductance. The > > early BOSS Bridgeport C

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-21 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 21:27 +, Leslie Newell wrote: > Yes it does sound like a variable reactor setup. The control signal is > DC and pushes the core into saturation, reducing it's inductance. The > early BOSS Bridgeport CNC mills used this sort of setup to reduce the > idle current on the

Re: [Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-21 Thread Leslie Newell
Yes it does sound like a variable reactor setup. The control signal is DC and pushes the core into saturation, reducing it's inductance. The early BOSS Bridgeport CNC mills used this sort of setup to reduce the idle current on the stepper motors. It also used to be quite commonly used on TIG w

[Emc-users] OT: Reactor

2010-11-21 Thread Kirk Wallace
I have what appears to be a transformer with a reactor in series with the secondary. The reactor is used to control the transformer output current. I can imagine the reactor will act like a normal inductor and impede the AC current, but the reactor has another coil on it. I assume this coil is used