Michael wrote:
> Get-E is already gone, so I think it's time to stop talking about it.
> :-)
>
That's too bad. I liked get-e, even the original one - which then
also went 'gone', and was subsequently
reborn again, but is now gone.. yet again. So, who knows how gone is
'gone' and who
Downknew Wise wrote:
> It seems a very good job!!! Maybe you should watch to some other fm project
> to make the work easier... because the work planned it's hard to realise...
>
Nah, efm is just very unfinished. It was never finished and is just now
coming together. Ptomaine is doing a great
On Monday, 21 July 2008, at 13:45:47 (+0200),
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> From a closed source company POV, BSD license is great because they
> dont need to give us anything back (fancypants example?); but for
> companies that do want to build an opensource initiative based on
> the EFL, BSD i
On Sunday, 20 July 2008, at 10:10:50 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> My comment is not about website 1 is better than website 2 because
> [put what you want here]. I'm not skilled enough to decide which one
> is better. It is that we have 3 websites that have more or less the
> same content. We m
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:45:47 +0200
"Jorge Luis Zapata Muga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
> thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
> where different companies are using this software, and
hi
i run e17 on nevada 91 and it's work very well
I have only one problem. When i try to loa forecast module or weather
module, e17 segfault
does someone have same problem ?
thanks
578:stat("/home/doof/.e/e/modules/forecasts/solaris2.11-i386/module.so",
0xFD7FFFDB9C60) Err#2 ENOENT
578
It seems a very good job!!! Maybe you should watch to some other fm project
to make the work easier... because the work planned it's hard to realise...
I'm not a developer and it's only my humble opinion, but most of the tickets
opened on e-trac for the DR e17 release are about e_fm... take a look
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> ProFUSION will release its code under LGPL (guarana and possible
>> others to come). And yes, we think just like you, but the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ProFUSION will release its code under LGPL (guarana and possible
> others to come). And yes, we think just like you, but the code is
> there and the majority of work was done by people that like it, so we
> do
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
> thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
> where different companies are using this software, and sever
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Themes are tricky. But its just a matter of documentation really.
> Rasters new theme is chock full of doc, and Ive started a blog on how
> to get some of the cooler effects for different Widgets and things.
> Also, if you check ou
I wasn't able to get evas_object_propagate_events_set working as
specified by the documentation. In fact, by reading the code, I don't
see how it can detect that a callback was found. So here is a patch
that just did this, I didn't apply it as I fear I could have
misunderstood the test and break ev
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
> thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
> where different companies are using this software, and sever
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
> thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
> where different companies are using this software, and sev
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-07-21 07:10:12 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
Packages
Themes are tricky. But its just a matter of documentation really.
Rasters new theme is chock full of doc, and Ive started a blog on how
to get some of the cooler effects for different Widgets and things.
Also, if you check out my new Cerium theme, you can see a
demonstration of the color_class idea
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I don't see why get-e should go away.. not if they want to give exchange
> a good challenge. They could support whatever exchange does, and extend even
> more - it could go as far as the drive and vision of its founders
Hi all,
I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
where different companies are using this software, and several of us
are working on a company using the efl (raster, gustavo, cedric, me,
anyone else?).
Vincent wrote:
>
>> There's got to be more to a web presence to E than themes... and
>> if you think
>> about it. :)
>
> i have nothing against exchange. Absolutely nothing. I even dreamt of
> such a thing for the Windows packages i want to build. I'm against
> that 2 sets of people
> There's got to be more to a web presence to E than themes... and if you
> think
> about it. :)
i have nothing against exchange. Absolutely nothing. I even dreamt of
such a thing for the Windows packages i want to build. I'm against that 2
sets of people (the maintainers of get-e and
Vincent wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>> Get-e *was* good, and useful. It could've done more in terms of
>> this and that,
>> but so could everything. But I don't see why everyone feels that
>> 'there can be
>> only one' of anything. I just don't understand this
Sthithaprajna wrote:
> Indeed, one of the main reasons for creating exchange was to make a
> webapp that was a lot more tightly integrated with the efl.
> Personally, I would like to see a ecore-style C library for exchange,
> so that people can just plop it into their apps and get a full
> rep
22 matches
Mail list logo
