An we've already heard your arguments, case closed now get to work!
We've already lost time, members and devs due to this ridiculous debate.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carsten wrote:
>
> > ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political foot
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
>> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license
>> is not a
>> reason one way or another for success or failure if license
Am Samstag 02 August 2008 02:52:08 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:25:17 +0800 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> seems there's a few votes for keep of embryo. i'm going to just monitor the
> sentiment here - i'm agnostic really - though edje needs a LOT better
> "scripting" su
Nick Hughart wrote:
> Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Nick wrote:
>>
>>> Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Carsten wrote:
> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football.
> license is not a
> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are
> oss anyway.
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Nick wrote:
>
>> Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>> Carsten wrote:
>>>
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football.
license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are
oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawbe
Nick wrote:
> Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Carsten wrote:
>>
>>> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license
>>> is not a
>>> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss
>>> anyway.
>>> we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
>>>
>>>
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Carsten wrote:
>
>
>> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
>> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
>> we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
>>
>>
>>
>
> That's no doub
Carsten wrote:
> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
> we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
>
>
That's no doubt true as a rule on any given project, but st
Christopher Michael wrote:
> Nick Hughart wrote:
>> Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> Enlightenment CVS wrote:
>>>
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : mekius
Project : e_modules
Module : tclock
Dir : e_modules/tclock
Modified Files:
t
Nick Hughart wrote:
> Christopher Michael wrote:
>> Enlightenment CVS wrote:
>>
>>> Enlightenment CVS committal
>>>
>>> Author : mekius
>>> Project : e_modules
>>> Module : tclock
>>>
>>> Dir : e_modules/tclock
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> tclock.edc
>>>
>>> Log Message:
>>> Patch fr
Christopher Michael wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS wrote:
>
>> Enlightenment CVS committal
>>
>> Author : mekius
>> Project : e_modules
>> Module : tclock
>>
>> Dir : e_modules/tclock
>>
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> tclock.edc
>>
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Patch from ptomaine, my awesome GSOC stu
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : mekius
> Project : e_modules
> Module : tclock
>
> Dir : e_modules/tclock
>
>
> Modified Files:
> tclock.edc
>
>
> Log Message:
> Patch from ptomaine, my awesome GSOC student :), to make the popup use font
> cla
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
> we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
>
> here's how it will go:
>
> 1. existing libs.
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:57:00 -0500 Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Dave Andreoli
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks Raster!! finally a POW that respect the others :)
> >> Are y
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>
>
>> Thanks Raster!! finally a POW that respect the others :)
>> Are you sure that we can (safetly) use LGPL for apps? From what I read
>> on the gnu site LGPL is e
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Thanks Raster!! finally a POW that respect the others :)
> Are you sure that we can (safetly) use LGPL for apps? From what I read
> on the gnu site LGPL is exaclty for libs, I didn't find nothing about
> using L
- "Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license
> is not a
> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss
> anyway.
> we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
>
> here's
Hi Fedor,
I'll ask *the* question everyone has on lips : is this code under LGPL or
BSD ?
More seriously, thanx for posting something about code ;-)
On 8/7/08, Fedor Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attached patch allows the tclock module's tip (that's a popup that
> appears when you hover t
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-08-07 07:10:51 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
Packages
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> Jorge Luis Zapata Muga schrieb:
>
>> As i said too many times, there was edata, this arguments are refered
>> to edata, not eina, you can think of eina on just the same
>> conceptually lib but developed from the base code of edata. So i
>> wasn't expecting developers on
Attached patch allows the tclock module's tip (that's a popup that
appears when you hover the widget) understand font classes, so you can
easily change the font using Fonts->Advanced dialog.
--
King regards,
Fedor Gusev.
? patch
Index: tclock.edc
==
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
here's how it will go:
1. existing libs. the LGPL crowd - RESPECT the licenses already used. d
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Some people don't want their code forked off and closed away and want
>>> all contributions to come back. This is the difference.
>>>
>>>
>> This sounds a lot like having your cake and
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Some people don't want their code forked off and closed away and want
>> all contributions to come back. This is the difference.
>>
>
> This sounds a lot like having your cake and eating it too heh. LGPL only
> stops the
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I still don't understand what about the BSD makes it not always free,
>> you can't steal the code, the free code is always there. Even if raster
>> wanted to, he could not just up and close t
Vincent Torri schrieb:
>> Actually I thought it was BSD licensed. I didn't expect that Trojan
>> horse tactic. Only after Vincent has asked me if it is ok for me to
>> switch to LGPL I realized that i contributed to a proprietary project.
>>
>
> Can you develop why a project using LGPL is a pr
> Actually I thought it was BSD licensed. I didn't expect that Trojan
> horse tactic. Only after Vincent has asked me if it is ok for me to
> switch to LGPL I realized that i contributed to a proprietary project.
Can you develop why a project using LGPL is a proprietary project ? For
me, a propr
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga schrieb:
>
> As i said too many times, there was edata, this arguments are refered
> to edata, not eina, you can think of eina on just the same
> conceptually lib but developed from the base code of edata. So i
> wasn't expecting developers on eina, i was expecting them on ed
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:16:45 -0400 "Hisham Mardam Bey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > It's always been the assumption that our core libs will be BSD from
> > the bottom up. E17 is also licensed BSD.
>
> This is a decis
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I still don't understand what about the BSD makes it not always free,
> you can't steal the code, the free code is always there. Even if raster
> wanted to, he could not just up and close the code. He would have to
> make
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> You can't tell me that im wrong as i did eina and took the decisions
>>> about it. I h
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You can't tell me that im wrong as i did eina and took the decisions
>> about it. I have to explain this as this totally wrong. Ein
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:26:11 +0800 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/08/2008, David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "As long as you retain this notice you can do whatever you want
> > > with this stuff. If you w
As every reader is not in the AUTHOR or AUTHORS, could we
make this licence give a pack of beer to everyone subscribed on
list ?
On 8/7/08, Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2008, David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 07/08/2008, David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "As long as you retain this notice you can do whatever you want with
> > this stuff. If you wish to use this in a commercial product, you must
> > supply the AUTHOR or AU
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "As long as you retain this notice you can do whatever you want with
> this stuff. If you wish to use this in a commercial product, you must
> supply the AUTHOR or AUTHORS with 1 case of beer each."
> Which is probably a little cl
Ive put together a couple ideas on a wiki entry. Its all concept stuff
at the moment so the sourceforge mailing list doesnt work. I think it
could be a great way to get small teams to collaborate on projects and
then promote E and their own country.
eg. "Emulate - EFL based MAME emulator - proudly
37 matches
Mail list logo