Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:48:05 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said: > Hello. > > > On 05/15/2018 07:21 PM, Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > > Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the > > calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

On Tue, 15 May 2018 13:49:46 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." said: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 19:21:55 +0200 > Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > > > Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the > > calendar item and removed the wiki

Re: [E-devel] Partial theme under enlightenment_start

On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:04:43 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." said: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 00:13:36 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:49:39 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." > >

Re: [E-devel] Terminology 1.2.1

On Mon, 14 May 2018 17:48:33 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 22:34:16 +0200 > Boris Faure wrote: > > > Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! > > > > I am pleased to release Terminology 1.1.1! > > > > This release

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

Hello. On 05/15/2018 07:21 PM, Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the > calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed solution. > > I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even wrote > "I'm in on this.

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

I uncancelled the event. Have this meeting since it was already scheduled, discussion and fine-tuning of schedule can continue independently. If a change is decided on, the schedule can be altered later. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:50 PM William L. Thomson Jr. < wlt...@obsidian-studios.com> wrote:

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

On Tue, 15 May 2018 19:21:55 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the > calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed > solution. > > I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed solution. I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even wrote "I'm in on this. Already added it to my own personal calendar with notifications

Re: [E-devel] Partial theme under enlightenment_start

On Tue, 15 May 2018 00:13:36 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:49:39 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." > said: > > CSD vs SSD. some apps are having elementary do the client side > decorations. x apps via

Re: [E-devel] EINA_MALLOC conflicting with EINA_PURE

Looks like 'pure'. Also the wording in the recent documentation is a bit different, if you find it more helpful (gcc-8.1.0): 'malloc' This tells the compiler that a function is 'malloc'-like, i.e., that the pointer P returned by the function cannot alias any other pointer valid

Re: [E-devel] EINA_MALLOC conflicting with EINA_PURE

AFAIU this function behaves like pure, as it will behave the same on every call (given a symbol and a subdir, the result is always the same). On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Marcel Hollerbach wrote: > Looking quichly at the definition of those two attributes. They conflict... >

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/01: efl_ui_slider: refactor slider widget.

Hello. On 05/15/2018 01:22 PM, 조재현 wrote: > Hello. > > Sorry for the errors.. > The following commits fix the errors and they have been submitted to the > upstream master. > bce7e7d0d7cd543f0905d1b15bde3de580f4e8e4 > 19833657e81734ac0b9d4bd9ffcca0dddfe21867 > > I will keep in mind your

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/01: efl_ui_slider: refactor slider widget.

Hello. Sorry for the errors.. The following commits fix the errors and they have been submitted to the upstream master. bce7e7d0d7cd543f0905d1b15bde3de580f4e8e4 19833657e81734ac0b9d4bd9ffcca0dddfe21867 I will keep in mind your advice. Thank you. Best Regards, Jaehyun Cho. -Original

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/01: efl_ui_slider: refactor slider widget.

Hello. On 15.05.2018 07:21, Hosang Kim wrote: > jaehyun pushed a commit to branch master. > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=5db61e4d64f684a8eaf4b75ebceb18d8708ac8d5 > > commit 5db61e4d64f684a8eaf4b75ebceb18d8708ac8d5 > Author: Hosang Kim > Date:

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

We tried that last time, and you where the only one from the KR Timezone while there are many committers from that part of the world, thats why i say, try it this week with the other time, and see if it changes :) Also i dont see a problem with doing 2 meetings close to each other, where one

Re: [E-devel] EINA_MALLOC conflicting with EINA_PURE

Looking quichly at the definition of those two attributes. They conflict... Something cannot call malloc when its pure, as the function is not the same when called twice with the same global and local state ... Removing pure is enough IMO. Greetings, bu5hm4n i) malloc: The malloc

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

On 15/05/18 15:05, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 18:38:38 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said: > >> I dont have strong feelings if its either shifted by 12h or by something >> else. Just reminding you, UTC + 20 means that there will likely be noone

Re: [E-devel] RFC unforgettable weekly meetings

On Mon, 14 May 2018 18:38:38 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said: > I dont have strong feelings if its either shifted by 12h or by something > else. Just reminding you, UTC + 20 means that there will likely be noone > else part of the meeting beside US people. I dont want to propose

[E-devel] EINA_MALLOC conflicting with EINA_PURE

Hello guys, After my system update (Arch), I get the following warning (a lot) during the compilation of EFL: ../src/lib/eina/eina_module.h:233:2: warning: ignoring attribute 'malloc' because it conflicts with attribute 'pure' [-Wattributes] eina_module_symbol_path_get(const void *symbol,