I took 10 minutes to create a ticket, after 4 unsuccessful
attemps, because
SPANK SPANK SERVER IS DOWN
Now that it works I wrongly hoped that I could join the backtrace,
and now it tells me
Submission rejected as potential spam
So, here is the backtrace.
Original Message ---
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
> I took 10 minutes to create a ticket, after 4 unsuccessful
> attemps, because
>
> SPANK SPANK SERVER IS DOWN
Yes, e2 is almost completely overloaded. We have a new beefy server,
e5, waiting to be configured and get service migrated to it, but
no
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:30:51 +0100
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
> > I took 10 minutes to create a ticket, after 4 unsuccessful
> > attemps, because
> >
> > SPANK SPANK SERVER IS DOWN
>
> Yes, e2 is almost completely overloaded. We have a new beefy server
In the year 2012, of the month of December, on the 1st day, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
> > I took 10 minutes to create a ticket, after 4 unsuccessful
> > attemps, because
> >
> > SPANK SPANK SERVER IS DOWN
>
> Yes, e2 is almost completely overloaded. W
> From: "Dave"
> To: "Enlightenment developer list"
> Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 5:46:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] This trac is a shit [Fwd: #1900: SIGSEGV OpenBSD]
>
> In the year 2012, of the month of December, on the 1st day, Cedric
> BAIL w
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:46:34 +1100 Dave said:
> In the year 2012, of the month of December, on the 1st day, Cedric BAIL
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
> > > I took 10 minutes to create a ticket, after 4 unsuccessful
> > > attemps, because
> > >
> > > SPANK SPANK S
On Friday 04 January 2013 16:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:46:34 +1100 Dave said:
>
> > In the year 2012, of the month of December, on the 1st day, Cedric BAIL
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
> > > > I took 10 minutes to create a ticket,
The plan seems sensible enough. I'll be happy to help out whatever way I
can.
Virtual machines, well as far as performance goes, if the vm is doing the
job fast enough, I don't really care what technology is used. I haven't used
kvm before, but shouldn't be too hard to work it out.
I'm not t
>> > > Yes, e2 is almost completely overloaded. We have a new beefy server,
>> > > e5, waiting to be configured and get service migrated to it, but
>> > > nobody seems to have the time to do it.
its no shame to ask for help when needed, especially when understaffed.
even if you have skills to take
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 23:18:04 +1100 Dave said:
> The plan seems sensible enough. I'll be happy to help out whatever way I
> can.
>
> Virtual machines, well as far as performance goes, if the vm is doing the
> job fast enough, I don't really care what technology is used. I haven't used
> kvm be
In the year 2013, of the month of January, on the 6th day, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 23:18:04 +1100 Dave said:
> >
> > I'm not too sure of the benefits of a reverse proxy in this instance.
> > It's easy enough to let iptables do dnat or load balancing, plus it's more
> > con
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:15:04 +1100 Dave said:
> In the year 2013, of the month of January, on the 6th day, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 23:18:04 +1100 Dave said:
> > >
> > > I'm not too sure of the benefits of a reverse proxy in this instance.
> > > It's easy enough to let
12 matches
Mail list logo
