me (if you can read frog :) ) :
http://steven.le-roux.info/comment-la-chine-a-detourner-15-du-trafic-int
Or :
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=249#
I reversed some numbers :)
It was : 15% of Internet BGP routes, during 18%.
The thing is... if in those 15% you
On 2013-04-03 15:05, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> Or we could use TLS/SNI on the RP to match the good vhost with one IP.
Even more incompatibility on client side.
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
R
On 2013-04-03 16:23, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:02:28 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> wrote:
>
>> #define work ?
>>
>> Even if you get a warning and a striked lock in your url bar, it's
>> working...
>>
>> SSL certs in browser is just a trust network... and you can just buy
>> this trus
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:02:28 +0200 Steven Le Roux
wrote:
> #define work ?
>
> Even if you get a warning and a striked lock in your url bar, it's
> working...
>
> SSL certs in browser is just a trust network... and you can just buy
> this trust with costly webtrust audit...
>
> In case you misse
#define work ?
Even if you get a warning and a striked lock in your url bar, it's
working...
SSL certs in browser is just a trust network... and you can just buy this
trust with costly webtrust audit...
In case you missed it, China had eaten 18% of the internet trafic during
15minutes... not an
On 03/04/13 13:57, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h52, « Tom Hacohen » a écrit :
>> On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
>>> said:
>>>
> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magicall
Or we could use TLS/SNI on the RP to match the good vhost with one IP.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h52, « Tom Hacohen » a écrit :
> > On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Be
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h52, « Tom Hacohen » a écrit :
> On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
> > said:
> >
> >>> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
> >>> working perfectly out of
On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
>>> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
>>> working perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
>>
>> Too lazy guys. And th
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h42, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
> > > but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
> > > working perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
> >
> > Too la
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> > but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
> > working perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
>
> Too lazy guys. And this not what I saw on other foss projets. Developers are
> not e
> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly working
> perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
Too lazy guys. And this not what I saw on other foss projets. Developers are not
end users, not the same investment the both of them. Often, FOSS
devel
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:44:37 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 12h25, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:16 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
> > said:
> >
> > > On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 12h25, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:16 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
> > On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> > > said:
> > >
> > >> We could go with CACert ... not a big
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:16 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> > said:
> >
> >> We could go with CACert ... not a big deal if a last century browser
> >> alerts
> >> with an unknown CA... at least
On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> said:
>
>> We could go with CACert ... not a big deal if a last century browser
>> alerts
>> with an unknown CA... at least chrome has it built-in already.
>
> we are with cacert. problem is sever
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux said:
> We could go with CACert ... not a big deal if a last century browser alerts
> with an unknown CA... at least chrome has it built-in already.
we are with cacert. problem is several current browsers dont support cacert.
it's the ssl cert kab
We could go with CACert ... not a big deal if a last century browser alerts
with an unknown CA... at least chrome has it built-in already.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Raoul Hecky wrote:
> Le 02.04.2013 14:58, Bertrand Jacquin a écrit :
> > On 2013-04-02 13:35, Raoul Hecky wrote:
> >> Le 31.
Le 02.04.2013 14:58, Bertrand Jacquin a écrit :
> On 2013-04-02 13:35, Raoul Hecky wrote:
>> Le 31.03.2013 22:49, Bertrand Jacquin a écrit :
>>> On 2013-03-28 09:21, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5153fd6e428484.46501811.png
http and https both... :/ :(
>>>
On 2013-04-02 13:35, Raoul Hecky wrote:
> Le 31.03.2013 22:49, Bertrand Jacquin a écrit :
>> On 2013-03-28 09:21, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>> http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5153fd6e428484.46501811.png
>>>
>>> http and https both... :/ :(
>>
>> OK. To made a report on this.
>>
>> Some people w
Le 31.03.2013 22:49, Bertrand Jacquin a écrit :
> On 2013-03-28 09:21, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5153fd6e428484.46501811.png
>>
>> http and https both... :/ :(
>
> OK. To made a report on this.
>
> Some people was wanting phab in HTTP for the gsoc page as the cert
On 2013-03-28 09:21, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5153fd6e428484.46501811.png
>
> http and https both... :/ :(
OK. To made a report on this.
Some people was wanting phab in HTTP for the gsoc page as the cert is
not an official trusted one, so we moved to HTTP, wha
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5153fd6e428484.46501811.png
http and https both... :/ :(
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com
--
23 matches
Mail list logo
