Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Mysth-R
Hi 2010/4/16 Terminus Est richterlevan...@gmail.com Hi there, About a week ago I tried e17 one more time. It's becoming more beautiful, but I still can't keep it as my sole WM. Why? I will answer: 1) There is not a login manager I use slim : very light and fast 2) There is not a file

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Christian Ullmann
Hi! What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... And wasnt where a e-lib music player out there some time ago (the interface was quite similar to xmms, but just not so complex)? what happend? And by

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Daniel Stonier
On 16 April 2010 17:17, Christian Ullmann x...@gmx.net wrote: Hi! What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... And wasnt where a e-lib music player out there some time ago (the interface was quite

[e-users] RES: Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Paulo Diovani
When i choose e17 as my WM, that was due to three reasons: 1. It's fast and clean. 2. It's beauty. 3. It's mainly, Just a WM. I have used Gnome, KDE and even XFCE for some time. But today i think i Just don't need all that deasktop integration, it easies some things, but by a great cost, mainly

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Mysth-R mysth...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2010/4/16 Terminus Est richterlevan...@gmail.com Hi there, About a week ago I tried e17 one more time. It's becoming more beautiful, but I still can't keep it as my sole WM. Why? I will answer: 1) There is not a login

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 16 April 2010, at 10:17:21 (+0200), Christian Ullmann wrote: What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... Eterm is complete and rock-solid. It is not, however, based on evas or the current EFL;

Re: [e-users] RES: Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 16 April 2010, at 10:12:39 (-0300), Paulo Diovani wrote: 3) There is not a terminal emulator Eterm can be mentioned as E's terminal emulator, and it is a great terminal emulator. It's only problem is the lack of utf-8 support, reason for qhat i changed to urxvt, that's very lite,

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 16 April 2010, at 13:33:21 (+1000), David Seikel wrote: I was a long time konsole user, but switched to eterm. I gave up on eterm though, mostly coz it just plain don't play well with mc, which is a critical app for me. Roxtem does work well for me now. I've never had any

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:17:21 +0200 Christian Ullmann x...@gmx.net said: Hi! What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... And wasnt where a e-lib music player out there some time ago (the interface

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:57:01 -0800 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi said: any efl login manager is going to be much fatter with respect to libraries loaded etc. etc. - it'll suck in a LOT of efl. but then again - if you then log into e17... it's moot as u need them anyway so it