Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:57:01 -0800 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: any efl login manager is going to be much fatter with respect to libraries loaded etc. etc. - it'll suck in a LOT of efl. but then again - if you then log into e17... it's moot as u need them anyway so it just moves the paging in t

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:17:21 +0200 Christian Ullmann said: > Hi! > > What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt > compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... > > And wasnt where a e-lib music player out there some time ago (the > interface was qu

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 16 April 2010, at 13:33:21 (+1000), David Seikel wrote: > I was a long time konsole user, but switched to eterm. I gave up on > eterm though, mostly coz it just plain don't play well with mc, > which is a critical app for me. Roxtem does work well for me now. I've never had any probl

Re: [e-users] RES: Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 16 April 2010, at 10:12:39 (-0300), Paulo Diovani wrote: > > 3) There is not a terminal emulator > Eterm can be mentioned as E's terminal emulator, and it is a great terminal > emulator. It's only problem is the lack of utf-8 support, reason for qhat i > changed to urxvt, that's very li

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 16 April 2010, at 10:17:21 (+0200), Christian Ullmann wrote: > What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt > compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... Eterm is "complete" and rock-solid. It is not, however, based on evas or the current E

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Mysth-R wrote: > Hi > > 2010/4/16 Terminus Est > >> Hi there, >> >> About a week ago I tried e17 one more time. It's becoming more beautiful, >> but I still can't keep it as my sole WM. Why? I will answer: >> >> 1) There is not a login manager >> > I use slim : v

[e-users] RES: Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Paulo Diovani
When i choose e17 as my WM, that was due to three reasons: 1. It's fast and clean. 2. It's beauty. 3. It's mainly, Just a WM. I have used Gnome, KDE and even XFCE for some time. But today i think i Just don't need all that deasktop integration, it easies some things, but by a great cost, mainly of

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Daniel Stonier
On 16 April 2010 17:17, Christian Ullmann wrote: > Hi! > > What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt > compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... > > And wasnt where a e-lib music player out there some time ago (the > interface was quite similar to

Re: [e-users] Some constructive criticism

2010-04-16 Thread Christian Ullmann
Hi! What about eterm right now? I saw the sources on SVN but i havnt compiled them. As you answered it seems eterm is a bit incomplete... And wasnt where a e-lib music player out there some time ago (the interface was quite similar to xmms, but just not so complex)? what happend? And by the

Re: [e-users] e16: new gvim(-type) windows may get placed off-screen

2010-04-16 Thread Kim Woelders
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:54:47 +0200, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:32:36 +0200, Kim Woelders wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:01:26 +0200, Dennis Nezic >> wrote: >> >> > On a crowded desktop (ie. if you just open a bunch of gvim windows), >> > e16 will position new gvim windows s