Re: [e-users] New e16 crashes on left click to desktop.

2006-12-12 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi, Sorry for the delay again. But I'm in the office today, and just upgraded the system to Solaris Nevada build 54, and then the latest E16 build (0.16.8.5 0.04) with this change in it to UCS-4. Everything seems fine now, the menu titles are being shortened correctly, I think. The first time I

Re: [e-users] New e16 crashes on left click to desktop.

2006-11-30 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
-4LE (UCS-4LE, UCS_4LE, UCS4LE), UTF-16 (UTF-16, UTF16, UTF_16), : in response to "iconv -l". So it *should* work? Ta, Mark. On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 22:13 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > Kim Woelders wrote: > >> I found a major bug in t

Re: [e-users] New e16 crashes on left click to desktop.

2006-11-24 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
box again until Tuesday. Ta, Mark. On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 21:56 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just updated my Solaris x86 box to the latest e16 build > > (e16-0.16.8.5-0.02) and found a bug - when I click the background (left >

[e-users] New e16 crashes on left click to desktop.

2006-11-23 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi, I just updated my Solaris x86 box to the latest e16 build (e16-0.16.8.5-0.02) and found a bug - when I click the background (left click) I get a SEGV. Middle and right clicks are fine. The stack trace goes: signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address) in _iconv at 0xfe8e12ef 0xfe8e12ef: _i

[e-users] e16-0.16.8.4 with Composite on Solaris/x64 - working.

2006-10-17 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi all, Don't know how many will be interested, but wanted to report success here. My current work desktop (besides my SunRay 1G) is an Ultra 20 with an NVidia board in it. Currently running Solaris Nevada build 41. I saw the announcement for the latest e16 build, and decided to give it a try

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2006-01-02 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 23:11 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > > *** IT'S A BIG, AN AMASING MISTAKE THAT CRIPLE THE RESPECT YOU OUGHT FOR THE > > WORK YOU'VE DONE > > > The configuration file changes are undoubtedly annoying in a highly > customized setup when you expect things to work entirely wi

Re: [e-users] e17_utils on Solaris...

2005-12-21 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 03:14, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > all you bandwidth sucking users are killing us! KILLING i say! AAAGRGHH > gurgle... splat. flop. pffft. And having seen King Kong this weekend, I know what a leach looks like, too... OK, so I'll back off and wait. Not like I can build the ut

Re: [e-users] e17_utils on Solaris...

2005-12-20 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 17:16, Andrew Williams wrote: > > First, none of the backgrounds on get_e.org have permissions set for > > downloading. Much of the site seems to be locked away, and it keeps > > going very slow on me, too. =O( > read the news ;) get-e has been throttled whilst we address hea

[e-users] e17_utils on Solaris...

2005-12-20 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi, So, I have e17 running on my laptop under Solaris nv_28 as well. And it looks great. Except I want to change the desktop background... First, none of the backgrounds on get_e.org have permissions set for downloading. Much of the site seems to be locked away, and it keeps going very slow on

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 18:09 +0100, Morten Nilsen wrote: > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > Not on the same screen they don't - I still need to switch over my > > environment. On the laptop I can do that (first) by creating a new user > > to test it, I suppose... > > I

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 17:52 +0100, Morten Nilsen wrote: > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > The lack of full Gnome hinting support would probably still keep me on > > e16 right now, though. But I will try to get e17 running next week. > > I'm currently running the last pre of

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
any of the issues that are not completely resolved by CVS > directly. > > http://cuddletech.com/porting/e17.html > > On 12/16/05, Mark R. Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 00:45 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > Given that e17 still onl

Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 00:45 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > It may be a bit late for this, e17 lurking just around the corner, but > it looks like there still are a handful of e16 users out there. Given that e17 still only appears to work on Linux, and not the other Unixes out there (is that still t

Re: [e-users] getting OOo2 to look half-decent

2005-09-19 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 16:21, Lucas Goss wrote: > Yeah, this is an OpenOffice issue. I'm not a big Java fan so I use > AbiWord... Errr, sorry, what's the look of OO got to do with Java? It uses it's own C-based GUI widgets, not Java, to display. The only Java involved is for other parts of the O

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment and KDE ?

2005-07-11 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 17:10, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 12:03 -0400, Geoffrey wrote: > > Sure, here's what I have in my .xinitrc file: > > > > gnome-panel & > > exec enlightenment That's one way. Another is to use the Gnome Session preferences dialogue to have Gnome-sess

Re: [e-users] e 0.16.6 on FC3, menus w/o text?

2005-04-18 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 17:05, Kim Woelders wrote: > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > Thanks - installed and running now, and I'll see how it goes =O) I had > > to hand-add "-lImlib2" to the end of the final gcc lines in dox and src > > for some reason, but otherwise a

Re: [e-users] e 0.16.6 on FC3, menus w/o text?

2005-04-15 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 23:47, Kim Woelders wrote: > I have uploaded a new snapshot containing "The SunRay Fix" > (e16-0.16.8-0.09.tar.gz). I'm not aware of any bugs, but I'd test it a > bit before rolling it anywhere :) > > As for a final release, no promises. I want to get the composite stuff > ri

Re: [e-users] e 0.16.6 on FC3, menus w/o text?

2005-04-14 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 17:57, Kim Woelders wrote: > Didier Casse wrote: > > Upgrade dude! Have you thought about upgrading imlib2 and e16? Did > > you realize that the latest stable version is 0.16.7.1.? ;-) > > > 0.16.7.2 :) As aware as I am of the penalties for asking this, but... How close ar

Re: [e-users] newbie: Solaris 2.9, Ultra 5, e16 installation problem

2005-03-27 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
And have you ensured that your framebuffer isn't being set to a default 8-bit root? When running Gnome, type "xdpyinfo" and see what the "depth of root window" is. This can be controlled with a "defdepth 24" added to the last line in /etc/dt/config/Xservers - make one if you don't have one - r

Re: [e-users] newbie: Solaris 2.9, Ultra 5, e16 installation problem

2005-03-02 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
And have you ensured that your framebuffer isn't being set to a default 8-bit root? When running Gnome, type "xdpyinfo" and see what the "depth of root window" is. This can be controlled with a "defdepth 24" added to the last line in /etc/dt/config/Xservers - make one if you don't have one -

Re: [e-users] Raster's paper.

2005-03-02 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 04:21, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > no - we don't support most of them yet. we still dont properly support basic > ICCCM. we need to make this all work properly. (PS - you managed to stay at > sun > without getting the chop! :):) good to hear after the recent axes falling in >

RE: [e-users] Raster's paper.

2005-03-01 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 18:34, Martin White wrote: > I can happily report that E16.999 was a doddle to get going under Mandrake > 10.1 With reference to the Mandrake 10 notes, and a little bit of searching on rpmfind.net, I can add that the fc1 RPMs work brilliantly on Sun Java Desktop 3 for Linux

Re: [e-users] CVS - no ale in fridge!

2004-10-01 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 11:34, Sandy Weicks wrote: > From e 16.7.2 cvs > checking for mass_quantities_of_bass_ale in -lFridge... no > checking for mass_quantities_of_any_ale in -lFridge... no > Warning: No ales were found in your refrigerator. > We highly suggest that you rectify this situation imm

Re: Re: [e-users] E 0.16.7 pre5

2004-07-06 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 16:22, Wouter van Marle wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 22:13, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > > The problem is to do with losing the focus and then not getting it back > > without whatever gained it on the other screen having lost it too. Put > > another

Re: Re: [e-users] E 0.16.7 pre5

2004-07-06 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 14:40, Wouter van Marle wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 20:00, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > > The workaround, as already said, is to give focus to another text entry > > area and then come back. You'll reproduce this easiest if you change > > scree

Re: Re: [e-users] E 0.16.7 pre5

2004-07-06 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 10:03, Viktor Kojouharov wrote: > This bug affects more or less every app that has a text input box. So > far for me it has appeared in opera and xchat. The way I fix it is by > spawning an Eterm so it gets the focus, and then continuing from where > I started. btw, for me it

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 18:05, Michael Jennings wrote: > Incorrect. First off, aterm and wterm don't have tabs either. > Secondly, Eterm DOES HAVE TABS. Well, that shows how long it's been since I tried it. But I switched to gnome-terminal when ETerm (a) didn't have tabs, and (b) was enough of a p

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 17:54, Michael Jennings wrote: > Anyone here who uses Eterm on SuSE might want to know about this. If > you think their reasoning sucks as much as I do, e-mail them and let > them know. Sorry, but I can see their point. No UTF-8, no tabs. Just unable to compete with the cu

Re: [e-users] Question about the Remeber-Application-Attributes-Option

2004-03-03 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 16:02, Sebastian Wassmuth wrote: > i want enlightenment to remember the border style for all of my > Eterm's. I open an Eterm, set the border style to BORDERLESS, select > "Remember -> Border style" and close the terminal. > If i start an Eterm, its style is set to BORDERLESS.

Re: [e-users] User Poll: Desktop Enviroments

2004-02-09 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 09:21, Ben Rockwood wrote: > Here's a poll that would help many of us in development: > > Question: Do you use a desktop enviroment such as KDE and/or GNOME > with Enlightenment DR16? Using E DR16 on top of Solaris 10 on SPARC, with the standard Gnome release with that (2.0

Re: [e-users] enlightenment problem with borders, menus, etc.

2004-01-29 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 14:08, Bobby Krupczak wrote: > >You could also check that your imlib_config settings, too... check the > >force and dithering settings. > > May I ask how/what to change? Running imlib_config should start up a GUI to change/set the settings. Ta, -- o o

Re: [e-users] enlightenment problem with borders, menus, etc.

2004-01-23 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 13:20, phriedrich wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:42:23 -0500 (EST) > Bobby Krupczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, on freshly installed SuSE 9 or RH8, the window borders are > > fuzzy and do not properly display the window decorations (x, square, > > underscore, circ

[e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.6-pre3 is out

2003-06-09 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi, OK, quick run-down on getting this running on Solaris10/SPARC. First point is - it does =O) and the Window List and stuff all works on latest Solaris with latest Sun-built Gnome =O) Many, Many thanks =O) OK, what I had to do: a) On Solaris, $YACC in the Makefiles for some reason was set t

Re: [e-users] e16.6-pre3 is out

2003-06-09 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 11:47, Christian Hansen wrote: > Just compiled and installet the e16.6-pre3 and everything works fine. A > lot of the bugs has been removed so thats pretty nice :-) > > But the mozilla focusbug remains unsolved. > > though it is not a big problem as I just clicks my pager t