On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:44:09 -0800 Steve Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:40 -0800 (PST)
> Jonathan Charnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > rpm based distro.
>
> http://www.caosity.org/
>
> cAos is fast, rpm-based, and has some fairly
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Jonathan Charnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpm based distro.
http://www.caosity.org/
cAos is fast, rpm-based, and has some fairly minimal install
configurations. It uses some of the latest 2.4 kernel code, and yum
(sort of like apt-get) on top of rpm.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:40 -0800 (PST) Jonathan Charnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> I'm no expert about this, but I really like the idea. I was hoping to
> switch distros myself sometime soon (soon meaning within 4 months).
> As a mandrake user, I can tell you what I like and wh
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:47:59 -0600 Ibukun Olumuyiwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> That said, I am welcome to the idea of building from ground up so that we
> can make this as lean and mean as we possibly can. However, some of these
> distributions (MandrakeMove, Knoppix notably) hav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:43:19 -0600 (CST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-users] E-based distro->Build out of what?
>
>
> Michael Jennings said:
> > On Wednesday, 03 March 2004, at 10:47:59 (-0600),
> > Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
> >
> &g
I'm no expert about this, but I really like the idea. I was hoping to
switch distros myself sometime soon (soon meaning within 4 months).
As a mandrake user, I can tell you what I like and what I don't like:
Likes:
ease of installation
frequent updates, whether security or just new version of a pro
On Wednesday, 03 March 2004, at 14:43:19 (-0600),
Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
> The question is about whether Mandrake would form a suitable base
> for the distro. It is not offtopic.
Actually, the topic of developing an E distro belongs on the devel
list, not here.
And yes, it's off-topic. It's al
Michael Jennings said:
> On Wednesday, 03 March 2004, at 10:47:59 (-0600),
> Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
>
>> > Mandrake is loaded w/ problems,... Besides Mandrake was build out
>> > of RH. So if we want to build a RH-based distro, why not take RH
>> > itself? :-p
>>
>> This is a common misconceptio
On Wednesday, 03 March 2004, at 10:47:59 (-0600),
Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
> > Mandrake is loaded w/ problems,... Besides Mandrake was build out
> > of RH. So if we want to build a RH-based distro, why not take RH
> > itself? :-p
>
> This is a common misconception. Mandrake is not loaded with
> p
On Wed 03 Mar 2004, Didier Casse wrote:
> On 03/03/04, at 13:52 +0900, Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:01:08 -0500 Justin P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> > > I would love to help out with this idea. I am new at this development
> > > thing, so I won'
On 03/03/04, at 13:52 +0900, Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:01:08 -0500 Justin P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > I would love to help out with this idea. I am new at this development
> > thing, so I won't be able to give much in the way of guidance but wo
11 matches
Mail list logo
