"coral.sea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we just wondered if the EOS 1V is the last of the Pro 35mm cameras from
> Canon?
Since most of the pros go digital, there is no real need even for
the 1V.
For me the best way would be to make a pro body with interchangeable
back, so that you could use fil
Hi, I have a question since I am not as familar with Canon EOS bodies as much
as I am with my older Olympus gear.
I have an opportunity to pick up a modified Canon 400mm FD 2.8 that has been
set up to shoot with a (EOS) T-mount . I have read that with some
tele-converters on some EOS bodies, t
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 04:12:21 +0100, you wrote:
>All I said is, of course, based on pure speculation. Maybe things will turn
>out completely different. I hope not. I'd still like to own a pro EOS
>camera, one day.
Maybe someday they will be available on the used market for low cost
like the form
Very good question. I've been asking myself that since the 1D was released
(I guess I was just trying to find a justification to buy a 1V :-). My guess
is that the EOS 1V will be one of the last pro film cameras made by Canon,
but not the last. I came to this conclusion for several reasons:
- The
Hi there,
I'm about to take the plunge and buy a Canon D-60. No questions about it
really, but I'll have to upgrade my old flash (430ez) to the 550ex.
When using my old 430ez off-camera with older 10s bodies, I find it performs
flawlessly. The only reason I'm upgrading is to maintain compatibi
>
>Why do you all prefer Canon ? :-)
Because there ain't nothing like the D60 anywhere else! :)
--
Harrison McClary
http://www.mcclary.net
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phom
I've got the 100-300 and I'm very happy with it, especially for the price. I
paid about $200 three years ago, and it's never let me down. I agree that it
could be a bit sharper when it's near 300mm, but I've never noticed anything
that would make an image unsellable, in my opinion.
The only pr
I was a Nikon man. Had an N70 and was thinking of upgrading to an N80 or
F100. I left Nikon and came to Canon because of the lenses. I got an EOS 3.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rachid
> Heffels
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 2:54 P
> Why do you all prefer Canon ? :-)
I chose Canon equipment many years ago because I started looking
through a Photography Buyer's Guide and Canon came first in the alphabet
of all the SLR's. I have never regretted this decision.
--Ken S.
*
***
> Terry Danks wrote:
> > I have the need for fast recycle time but don't understand the advantage
> > of this unit. It uses AA cells . . . just like the 550ex alone. What's
> > the advantage?
>> Martijn Stol wrote:
> I think you mean the CP-E2.
> It takes 6 aa cells, and has its own high-voltage g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rachid
> Heffels
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 2:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS Canon vs Nikon
>
>
> Hi,
> I need a new camera and I really don't know if what camera to choose.
> Should I
I have owned both lenses and currently use the 75-300 IS. The 100 to 300mm is
internal focusing (non- rotating front barrel), and this produces much faster
focusing. It is also easier to use with a polarizer. The 75 to 300mm is less
expensive, except for the IS function, which really does work
Terry Danks wrote:
> I have the need for fast recycle time but don't understand the advantage
> of this unit. It uses AA cells . . . just like the 550ex alone. What's
> the advantage?
I think you mean the CP-E2.
It takes 6 aa cells, and has its own high-voltage generator built in.
These are used
What will you use it for mainly?
> -Original Message-
> From: Shah, Lokesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 11:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS Canon EF 75-300mm vs EF 100-300mm lenses
>
>
> I am planning to buy one of Canon EF 75-300mm or Canon EF
I have the need for fast recycle time but don't understand the advantage
of this unit. It uses AA cells . . . just like the 550ex alone. What's
the advantage?
--
Terry Danks
Wildlife and Nature Photography
http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/danksta/home/htm
*
***
*
I am planning to buy one of Canon EF 75-300mm or Canon EF 100-300mm. Can anyone advice
as to the pros and cons of either?
Thanks,
Lokesh
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepa
From: Ken Durling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Interesting question, the future of film SLR's. I don't own an
> EOS-1V, but to those of you who do, and can envision a successor to
> it, what would you change/improve?
Perhaps another system to change the AF point.
With a good pad for example.
<+> W
17 matches
Mail list logo
