Yes yes you are right. I am so sorry. How dare I reply to such a silly
email Bad weather in England?
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Talbot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Canon EOS 1Ds Price
>
>
> > I ha
> Turn this on head and you have an even more revealing question:
> "Why the need to get upset about someone saying something about a
> camera?"
I am just surprised by people who treat cameras or lenses in silly ways,
that's all. I am surprised at people at some sites that buy cameras because
the
YOu have a good point, there are cases where you can't back up a bit...
Do you have a website for these train pictures? One of my projects when I go
to Turkey is to do something similar...
evrim
> I guess I must be one of the "weird one percent". My
> personal passion is photographing Swiss t
How many times did you REALLY need a shot in that range? HOw many film
photographers have a 14mm lens?
There are advantages/disadvantages to each 'tool'. What does a film
photographer do when he has an ISO 100 in his camera when he needs ISO 800?
etc. etc.
For me, I just step back a little, or
> The new camera will be a must for any business pro - and a bummer for
> anyone who does not earn enough to cover it.
> The D60 is relegated from a real camera to an amateur's toy.
Is this for real? What kind of a remark is that.
I guess suddenly D60 started taking worse pictures
There is
Hi Ken,
How are you? Hope all is well!
I look at couple places... ebay, keh, adorama, to determine how much it is
worth. PLus Chip here is also informed about prices, so you might ask him
(Chip, it's always very nice to read your emails, btw).
Fyi, I paid ~$590 for my lens. It had the tripod c
Peter,
Since I use available light only I use f2.8 a lot. f8 for me is not that
important, almost all lenses are pretty ok by then.
I am surprised to see how sharp the Sigma is :)
But sharpness is only part of the equation, I am convinved about this after
getting the 80-200. The contrast and co
HI there,
I meant the older 80-200 2.8L that does NOT have USM.
I know what you mean about the weight though, after shooting 12 hours of
wedding it feels so heavy!!! And that is with only a D60 (granted it had the
battery grip and a flash but...).
Somehow the 80-200 2.8L is different then the 7
Mehrdad,
I actually used to have this lens (the 4L) and then switched to the 80-200
2.8L.
Somehow, the pictures from the 80-200 2.8L seems sharper, 'more alive'. If
you do not need very fast autofocus speed (and the 80-200 is not slow
either), then I would buy a used 80-200 2.8L over the 4L anyd
Alex,
I am not very happy with the low light focusing of that particular lens.
Some users at dpreview.com reported that if you back up from the widest
angle and the most telephoto (that is, isntead of 28mm, use 29-30mm, and do
not zoom in fully), then it improves the focus with that lens.
Person
Hi there,
I had both of these flashes for a while.
They both work very well. For film cameras, I definitely recommend the Sigma
Super 500. However for digital D30 and D60, I found the E-TTL to be
inconsistent, and switched to the Sunpak PZ5000af.
I am sure both would be fine for you, however
I like this lens. For the price, great value. Check this out:
http://www.evrimgallery.com/Dance/dance_005.jpg
> Hi folks,
> has anyone had a hands on experience using ZENITAR 2.8/16
> FISH-EYE LENS
> with canon mount with elan7/eos33?
> would you please share the experience?
> Thanks!
> Anatol
Look at the Tokina 19-35, newer version. It's good enough, though prone to
flare (more so then is expected from a wide angle zoom of this range). I
currently have the Sigma 15-30 and it works fine, though whoever designed
that af/mf switch mechanism must be smoking something!
> Does anyone have
I see what you are thinking of...
I guess I always liked carrying just one lens and I found that I am always
looking for more wide angle. But if you have an 16-35 then it does not make
sense!
as somebody said, this is an update to this great lens.
-e
> -Original Message-
> > Al Ruscelli
I bought from this guy and he delivered what he promised. But I take no
responsibility.
EOS 3 + Canon IS 28-135 in exc. condition for sale, $1200 obo.
Direct all inquiries to :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mervyn christoffels
Sr. Network Engineer
AOL/IC/Int'l Network Architecture
Office,+1 703-2655376
P
Hi Alex!
Welcome to the club.
Seems like you are in Israel? NOw sure what the availability of the
following is there...
If money is an issue, I can recommend couple alternatives that might help
you while you get the rest of the gear. EOS 3 is a great body, good choice.
Now that digital is all t
So 28-80 performs at f8 the same as a 50mm at f2.8. I think that is not very
impressive. The point is, there is a noticable difference between these two
lenses, imho. When I tried my 85mm 1.8 vs 28-135, I was able tosee how much
sharper the 85mm was from a 4x6, which is amazing.
The 28-80 sharpne
I am surprised that you would want a extr 10mm at the long end then 4mm at
the short end. The 4mm at the wide end is much more pronounced effect then
you will get at the 10mm, don't you think? Also you can always crop tighter
and enlarge but can't put detail that is not there that youw ould get wi
> Image quality... well the 50 f/1.8 will be better than your
> zoom - but not
> that much. I would perhaps not buy this lens to get better
> image quality
> alone.
Hugo,
I agree with your email but not this poiunt. The 50mm is a very sharp lens
and nice contrast. THe 28-80 is a not a good le
You would be very advised to get this lens. I do not agree with the build
quality issues unless you use this very veyr often or very demanding. Esp.
compared to the lens you have, you will see GREAT improvement.
You will be able to take shots much further away, but you woul dbe at
1.8
> Hi
I will buy a digital body that has better ISO noise, and better Autofocus.
Anything over 6mp is not such an attraction.
> At this moment true every word. But I suppose dropping of
> body prices gets slower in future. For example, editorial
> staff at my client magazine use now digitals in gener
I use these units quite a bit with my D60 and so far didn't kill anything :)
I know a lot of photographers using them too.
> Eos List,
> Does anyone use these flash units - Alien Bees.
> And do you know what the actual sync voltage is. I'm
> using... well will be
> using a Eos A2e w
They don't afaik. I could not find mercury cells even in canada, and the
ones I found were not what i wa slooking for :(((
> Might they have Mercury cells?
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://
avoid filmshop.com (a.ka. uniquephoto.com). Overall bad experience, undated
film etc.
I really like isofilms.com - they also sell batteries. Always prompt and
nice to me so far.
evrim
> -Original Message-
> From: Francis Zhou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 200
They are fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: Francis Zhou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:26 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: EOS OT: Adorama reliable mail order house?
>
>
> I want to order some Fuji Reala film. I usually order from
> B&H, but th
Look for a 80-200 2.8L lens used. I swapped my 70-200 4L with this and
though it focuses a little less faster, I have been very very happy.
I was out shooting today at the park while I went out to swing dance, and
these are couple shots with this lens, wide open:
http://www.zuga.net/forums/showth
is it just me or that this Rebel Ti is very ugly?
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
Why then have exactly the same range for already a cheap(ish) lens? I think
canon is just trying to increase their profit margin ?
> As the new EF 28-105mm f4-5.6 will be a slower lens than the
> existing EF
> 28-105mm f3.5-4.5, it would seem unlikely that the older lens will be
> dropped. Espec
they seem to work fine with D30 and D60. AT least my Zenitar seems to be ok.
-e
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was wondering whether the widely reported metering problems
> of the EOS 30/33/Elan7/7e with non chipped, non EF lenses is
> also an issue with the D30 and D60? Has anyone had an
> opportuni
Anybody knows where you can rent one of these?
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
Hi Chip,
HOw are you :)
The 1D is the one I would buy over D60 if I had the money. FRom what I heard
it is in fact similar to D60 for noise characteristics, and better for
higher ISO's.
Getting a D60 migyht be a tough even if you want to. There is a very long
backlog...
-e
> -Original Me
it crashed my web browser couple times.
>
> > http://www.invisitec.com/invisitec/protec_demo_ns.shtml
>
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
www.quickstopphoto.net is pretty good. they are decently priced. send your
files in sRGB. The quality has been really goodfor me.
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerin
why does ti do this?
> Its my understanding that the frontier converts anything it
> gets to 300dpi
> before it processes and it magnifies the image by 6% as it prints.
> If you give them an image for a 4x6 at 300dpi plus 6% that would be
> 6*300*1.06=1908 x 4*300*1.06=1272.
*
***
I think the reference was to your 'good' portrait comment, not to being in
focus. Also there is a lot more out there for portraits then those done in
studio's :)
> Craig Zendel wrote:
> >From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >(edited)
>
> > ..Agreed on more light but neve
Those are very young tennis players.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mehrdad Sadat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS Canon 1D and 400 DO IS in action
>
>
> here are some of the shots i took with the 1D and 400 DO IS,
Hi Bob,
I placed a hold on it. I never use TC's anyway. Cosmetically it is in Good
condition, optically excellent. Has tripod collar, hood (though one of the
clip on's has the plastic pulled out). I use this for candids and portraits.
Thanks again!
evrim
> The 80-200 is a great lens. In fact, s
I bought a new 70-200 4L last year. It's in mint condition. But i rarely use
it, and when I do, f4 is sometimes not as convenient. I do not shoot sports,
mostly candid pictures.
I am thinking of picking up a used 80-200 2.8L at my local store for $595
with hood, tripod bracket and is in very good
I think a combination of disabling right mouse click, putting invisible
image on top of the actual image, and a proof mark will make sure not many
people will steal. But if you can see it on the screen, then it can be
captured. YOu are just making sure it is harder.
> I'd not normally burden the
All fit and all work the same way :) unlike Nikon where it works but works
in a downgraded fashion depending on camera.
> At 8:56 PM +0200 7/18/02, Rachid Heffels wrote:
> >Can I fit new lenses on a EOS Rebel as well ?
>
> As long as they're EF-mount lenses designed for EOS cameras.
>
> All
Worked for me.
>
>
> I had notification of this a few days ago, but haven't had
> time to look so
> far. If anyone has upgraded their firmware are the results
> good, or are
> there any unpleasant side-effects to report?
>
*
***
*
Does anybody use this lens? There are some good reviews on dpreview forums,
but somehow I trust the opinions on this list more.
This is for my D60. I found that my Tokina 19-35mm (new version) was
incredibly flare prone, for example :
http://www.swingout.net/photos/karendan/GettingAway/0655_img_7
Somebody mentioned this new lens here. Did anybody actually read anything
abut it?
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
It has no focusing problems at all with canon. it had problem with 1 or 2
nikon bodies. this is my main lens and i agree about being built like a
tank. one major plus is that it has a great manual focus ring and mechanism.
where did you hear about the 28-70 SV? any more info? i would be very
int
Did anyone use Vivitar 850af? Specifically, I am interested with D30/D60. I
was going to purchase a Sunpak 5000af, but this flash seems pretty capable
as well.
evrim
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, s
Did anyone use Vivitar 850af? Specifically, I am interested with D30/D60. I
was going to purchase a sunpak 5000af, but this flash seems pretty capable
as well.
evrim
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
HOw are they optically the same then? One would provide better bokeh, right?
I guess that does not count.
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: EOS 28-105 v1 vs v2
>
>
> At 5:21 PM
The pictures and items are here:
http://www.pbase.com/evrim/sell
Photo items:
Quantaray QTB-9500A TTL flash with fill flash for Canon EOS autofocus
cameras - $75
Hoya CLose UP Filter 77mm - $50
Tiffen 812 77mm - $20 (for overcast skies)
Tiffen 81A 77mm - $25 (for overcast and very o
Never mind :) I figured it out.
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
Is there a difference between Cano 28-105 I and II ? HOw can you tell which
one I have?
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
*
Try the Tokina 28-80 2.8 ATX Pro, same price as the 28-135, but optically
pretty good.
you are relatively new to the Canon so try before you fork out lots of cash.
deltainternational.com is a good source.
-e
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Parrott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: We
Actually try the Sunpak 5000af. Has a focus assist light as well,a nd it
communicates with the camera for ISO etc.
> > Might just have to give the Thrystor a try.
>
> Yep. Metz 54 MZ highly recommended.
>
>
> Michael Quack
*
***
***
Hi there,
I think if you read zuga.net and dpreview.com, you will see that for some it
works well and for some it does not. So it is not just you two. I am pretty
sure Glen here also experienced this.
I tried the fill flash yesterday with my Sigma Super. I think I am going to
sell this flash bec
I have a 85mm in excellent condition. Want to trade it for 50mm 1.4.
Anybody up for it?
-e
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
I have a 85mm in excellent condition. Want to trade it for 50mm 1.4.
Anybody up for it?
-e
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
**
I always thought some optical element was made floating. Thanks Patrick -
for clarifying this.
-e
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 6:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS IS gives you more than you realize
>
>
Right tools for right applications!
> -Original Message-
> From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:57 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: EOS IS gives you more than you realize
*
***
***
Look at the Tokina 80-200 2.8. Very highly regarded.
> Erwin Harkink wrote:
> I understand what you mean, but I need a *fast* medium-tele,
> and preferably
> black! Maybe I'll go for the Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX HSM. Same
> price as the
> EF200mm but with the advantage of zoom... But since I only hav
That is light reflecting from dust.
> -Original Message-
> From: JSGR & HHBK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:29 PM
> To: EOS Listserv
> Cc: Brad Crafton
> Subject: EOS digital anomaly explanation? (off topic Canon S30)
>
>
>
> Hello everyone. I got a Canon
The 2.8 pics so different that i wonder if there was another variable
involved. One is incredibly soft.
> Take a look at this site:
> http://www.fredmiranda.com/17_35VS16_35/index.html
> It gives a pretty comprehensive comparo of the two lenses in question.
*
***
I have to say that fill flash worked very well with e-ttl - that is one
thing that I would definitely keep this flash for :)))
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/
Hi Bob,
So it is confirmed (almost :) ). My experience is parallel to yours, in that
E-ttl and film is ok but with digital it does not seem to work reliably, at
least with d30 (and even with FEL). How about 1D users?
-e
> I moved from an EOS-5 and 540-EX to an EOS-3 and 550-EX. My
> flash sho
Then why don't you just use manual flash? :)
I am sure many of you expect the camera to work well in E(valuative) mode.
My point is that is it too much to expect that when you put a flash in auto
mode and the camera in auto mode, you should get somewhat consistent
exposures?
I actually can't
Ok, reading these discussions, and other's, I am just curious - if E-TTL
requires this much user intervention, is it really that great a flash
system?
When I buy a super duper flash system that is 2x the price of the other
flashes, I expect it to work well in point and shoot mode, which is
somet
I read that their test camera's have EOS mount on them. So who knows...
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananda Subramaniam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:09 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: EOS Re: Ohhh c'mon Skip, be real! Scanning film
>
>
> Suppose
I have a Polaroid Sprint Scan 4000. Apart from scanning older negatives, it
does not do anything. I htink I have not used it in the last 3 months, and
shot 2 rolls of film in total (other then the wedding I shot). After I
started going digital, never went back. But then I do not do anything beyond
Neil,
I thought you said zenitar on elan 7 was of by a fixed amount? Did I
misunderstand? Just making sure i have the right information.
thanks,
evrim
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
April 27, 2002 1:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EF28-70 f/2.8 & EOS 1D (from Photo.net)
>
>
> "Icoz, Evrim" wrote:
> >
> > Himm, seems like we should not buy Canon lenses, since they might be
> > incompatible for future cameras. :))
>
Himm, seems like we should not buy Canon lenses, since they might be
incompatible for future cameras. :))
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EF28-70 f/2.8 & EOS 1D (from Photo.net)
Thanks Gary :)))
> Oh, and Evrim the CP-E2 costs $119.95 at B&H, that's where I got mine.
>
> Gary Russell
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
**
Well, depends on what you will use for but ... I used the 100-300mm 5.6 ,
older style, constant f5.6. Quite sharp, nice contrast. I bought it on the
advice of Peter K. from this list, and was happy. No, you won't catch action
well with this lens, it focuses slow, but then I am not sure if the
(75)
So I assume you can also use this with NiMH batteries? How much does it
cost?
-e
> Long time no chat. This flash booster sounds like it might
> help on the odd
> indoor/low light job I do where I have been hampered by
> recycle time. I
> switched the 550 over to NiMh batteries and got the recyc
What will you use it for mainly?
> -Original Message-
> From: Shah, Lokesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 11:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS Canon EF 75-300mm vs EF 100-300mm lenses
>
>
> I am planning to buy one of Canon EF 75-300mm or Canon EF
Hi Jan,
It has no such problems in Canon's, as far as I know. I have one that i Have
used with Elan II's and D30, it is my regular lens when I take only one
lens. I also own 28-135, and 28-105 Canon's. I would not say it flares more
then 28-135. Flare has not been a thing that bothered me, esp. i
I very muhc prefer film at 1600 iso. at 800, i think esp after some digital
cleaning it is a tie.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Henkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS D30 vs. film at ISO 1600
>
>
> Hi all,
>
It is real - though I never really managed to use it that much...
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Durling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS Elan II EC DOF preview?
>
>
> I read somebody saying (on another site) th
I apologize for this message, I was trying to email Michael directly...
> -Original Message-
> From: Icoz, Evrim
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 1:31 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: EOS Canon Lens Hoods FS
>
>
> Michael,
>
>
>
Michael,
> Canon ET-65III Lens Hood for 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2, 135mm f/2.8 SF,
> 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 LNIB $15
I am interested in this. Do you still hjave it?
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*ht
Sounds like camera world of oregon vs pro photo supplu, though pro photo
supply has some great stuff too. Great guys (cute girls too *lol*)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS d60 - where is a good place to get it?
>
>
> "Icoz, Evrim" wrote:
> >
> > I sold my D30... Now getting a D60. I think for weddings it
> will be good for
> > me to have 6megapixels, esp. for group shouts...
>
Their price for D60 is $2799... Normally it is $1999!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS d60 - where is a good place to get it?
>
>
> Glazers is not my favorite s
think I can live with slow AF, since I don't shoot sports.
> I just hope
> that I can successfully get it on Ebay.
>
> Thanks again and best regards,
>
> Lawrance Lee
> Melbourne, Australia
>
>
> Original Message Follows
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 1
I sold my D30... Now getting a D60. I think for weddings it will be good for
me to have 6megapixels, esp. for group shouts...
Anyway - now I can't find a place that has it in less then a month!
any places you know that might carry this in 1-2 week frame?
---
Harrison,
There is also Yarc, which might be cross platform...
> -Original Message-
> From: Harrison McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: EOS Query about the D30
>
>
> >>oh also, you will need breezebrowser
> I am wondering what the negatives of an EOS D30 are - I hear
D30 does not use negatives, it is a digital camera.
Joking :) negatives of d30 -> low light focusing, fast moving object
focusing. the first one remedied by using a flash that has some sort of
focus assist and using f2.8 o
I never noticed that D30 had a big shutter lag, it is pretty good, imho... I
do dance photography and I am ok with it... with birds maybe it might be
something different..
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael J. Shupe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 12:39 PM
>
I have to disagree somehow - even though I was very surprised how small
28-105 was,i would not consider 28-135 huge, or even that big. a tokina
28-80 i smuch heavier and slightly bigger...
> -Original Message-
> From: Gunars Smerlins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2
Seems like the idea is to sell film camera's. Lenses can be used with their
digital camera's so they don't seem to include much rebate, but appaerntly
they are trying ot push the film camera's..
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28,
There is a lot of room between f2 and f16 ! FOr portraits, considering how
far you are, you should not need anything more then f8.
How far away are these little doggies? Even with f2.8, with pitch dark
ballroom, my focusing is pretty acceptable, so not sure why this is
happening to you!
> -
Hi Peter,
105 vs 135 really does not make that much of a difference imho for portraits
purposes. both of these are slow lenses for portrait work.
28-135 is not really sharper then 28-105. or even my Tokina 28-80 2.8. All
of them have advantages and disadvantages. I have all three of these lens
I didn't get peter's original email, so i can only see this part:
> > As to sharpness, its the old saga again and again. Check
> out the list below
> > which are the test results from Photodo comparing the
> 28-105mm v. 28-135mm
> > IS. In every case the 28-135IS is sharper and has a bit less
Hi Peter,
105 vs 135 really does not make that much of a difference imho for portraits
purposes. both of these are slow lenses for portrait work.
28-135 is not really sharper then 28-105. or even my Tokina 28-80 2.8. All
of them have advantages and disadvantages. I have all three of these lens
This is what I wonder:
I understand that camera picks the rigth EV based on whatever the algorithm
it has (center weighed, spot, evaluative whatever). But after that, how does
it decide which combination of aperture and shutter speed?
-e
*
***
***
sorry abou thtis. wrong list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Icoz, Evrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:38 PM
> To: eos
> Subject: EOS michigan'da buyuk skandal
>
>
> http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/ce/multi/0,1329,5157126_55,00.ht
Icoz, Evrim would like to recall the message, "michigan'da buyuk skandal".
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
I thought the rule was that some FS: type of adds were ok, as long as it was
not abused. Ebay was out.I personally do not mind seeing some FS: adds but
once a week from the same person is a bit too much. If no FS adds are
allowed, then I am sorry since I sent an occasional one or two (ended up
sel
http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/ce/multi/0,1329,5157126_55,00.html
Gozuken o ki Muhtesem beslinin kurulumu biraz da para yardimiyla olmus!
Webber'in kisiligi hakkinda da ipucu verebilir bize.
*
***
***
* For list instructions, includ
This is really stupid.
I lost my manual for Elan II and D30 manual is confusing me. In the manual
it says that the BOX mode [] is center weighted, () mode is partial and (.)
mode is evaluative. (Sorry for the approximate symbols) Is that true?
http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/customer/manual
Seems like there is incompatibility even between Canon parts! Forget about
the third party!
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Loke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 7:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EOS 550EX Folklore
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
