On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Bill Essig wrote:
I downloaded fedora core 3 7 times yesterday and today. Everytime I get
the wrong MD5 sum and a different sum every time. I finally tried to
just burn a image to a cd to try and se how badly it is damaged, it was
bad. I'm wondering if any of you had any id
an average of 3 degrees. Does Symantec still
have that office by Gateway? I thought they had moved.
--- Po Petz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
My six-degrees-o-separation mojo isn't working well right now.
I was
wondering if anyone who works at Symantec up by Gateway is on
this list
co
Hi,
My six-degrees-o-separation mojo isn't working well right now. I was
wondering if anyone who works at Symantec up by Gateway is on this list
could drop me a line, please.
Thanks,
-po
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Allen Brown wrote:
All addresses work by IP address. None work by name, except for those
we have inserted into /etc/hosts.
Just to rule out /etc/nsswitch.conf, what does the line beginning with
"hosts:" include? It should have something like "hosts: files nis dns" in
it.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, larry price wrote:
currently my backup strategy (for my stuff) consists of Raid 1 on one
machine and selective directory mirroring using rsync from the other
machines, plus a monthly session of cd burning for critical data. It's
starting to look inadequate and in the case of
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Jim Beard wrote:
In /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0 there exists a file called CGI.pm, and CGI.pm.newcgi.
I created the CGI.pm file from the .newcgi file in hopes that it would see it
and execute. Is this my problem? I had the same issue with CGI::Carp.pm and
it went away when I made
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Jim Beard wrote:
Only problem is my Perl and Apache config seems a bit boinked.
Describe the perl and apache. Are they redhat 9 defaults? Did you update
them with some other rpms? Rebuilt from srpms? Built from source?
I added the '/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/CGI.pm' line myself
d. A little more expensive than others but both
the service and customer support are fast and responsive. A minor nit is
their Linux distribution selection is a touch limited.
-po
Po Petz wrote the following on 12/1/2004 1:52 PM:
I was wondering if anyone had any experience with VPS providers;
pr
I was wondering if anyone had any experience with VPS providers;
preferrably with Open/Freebsd instances but Debian or FCore are fine. I've
worked with JohnCompanies before but I was shopping around for a slightly
better deal than $65 a month since this is for a low-bandwidth, small
footprint p
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Darren Hayes wrote:
RightO. That's why the thread belongs in the null hole.
Procmail is your friend.
-po
___
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Jim Beard wrote:
Thanks for the response, I'll check out mantisbt. I was looking at FogBugz
the other day. Have you used it? I have read several of Joel Spolsky's
articles in the past and thought that he has a real good head on his
shoulders in regards to software develop
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Jim Beard wrote:
I, and many of the developers I was working with at the time, eventually
stopped using Bugzilla because it seemed to be overly complex. There
too many features and things to track, it became cumbersome and a bit
overwhelming.
That's too bad. I've found Bug
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, larry price wrote:
> I rather doubt that anyone on this list is using passwords this weak.
You'd also have to be running OpenSSH with "PermitRootLogin yes" for all
the checkauth("root",,) calls, no?
> I guess I'm mildly surprised at how crude the damn thing is, couldn't
> th
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Bob Miller wrote:
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > But then again, using safer functions, W^X, randomized memory allocation
> > and mapping, privilege separation, propolice, etc, minimize the risk
> > of bugs becoming serious security problems. Some of these things are
> > availabl
I am not a lawyer but I need someone who is.
I just burned a bunch of time negotiating and ultimately withdrawing my
bid on contact because of some disagreement over IP and non-compete
provisions. Law is just one of those weird programming languages that I
will just have to take a course in event
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> What's the point of encryption for an archived mailing list?
Signatures for non-repudiation/non-disavowal of bad advice.
"That iptables rule came from, uhm, a different Po..."
-po
___
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMA
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Russ Johnson wrote:
> Just because you lose the key to your house, with the address tag
> attached, does not give anyone the right to enter your house without
> your permission.
>
> How is this different?
If they came in and left cookies, you wouldn't hear me complain. But if
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Mr O wrote:
> You just confused me. Looking for DDR for a desktop? That's
> 184pin. SDRAM is 168pin. Laptop DDR is 200pin, laptop SDRAM is
> 144pin.
>
> --- Po Petz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need a 168pin 256MB PC2100 DDR DIMM (non reg,
I need a 168pin 256MB PC2100 DDR DIMM (non reg, non ecc).
In exchange for:
W. Richard Stevens' Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment
and Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography 2nd edition
(both read, good condition, no markings)
or
new Dell laptop battery type 3R305 (4320mAh) - fits newer
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Bob Miller wrote:
> So is there an X program that can explicitly set the selection
> from the command line?
>
> $ xsettheprimaryselection http://w3.org/
Xclip does but not with the same syntax
It'd be:
$ echo http://w3.org/ | xclip
http://people.debian.org/~kims/xclip/
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, perdurabo wrote:
> While I agree to a large extent, I think there's something to be said
> for large corporate ISPs with too many users, too many policies, too
> many eyes, and too much work to make "privacy violation" ventures
> feasible/desirable. I'd wager that it affords m
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, perdurabo wrote:
> Additionally, if you are concerned about your privacy, you might want to
> give weight to a big corporation, as I am personally aware of local
> folks at a few local ISPs who like "examining web/nntp traffic" and
> "grepping for interesting keywords" in mail
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Larry Price wrote:
> Actually, I had someone go in and dump the list roster for me last night,
> I suspect that someone who had turned off mail delivery for their address
> but not formally unsubscribed would display exactly these symptoms.
I've avoided this (after many prior
23 matches
Mail list logo
