I've heard of "Altered States", but what is this "alert status" business?
(And why do you think I should remember falling asleep, when short term
memory doesn't operate during sleep?)
On 30 May 2015 at 02:48, John Clark wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 LizR wrote:
>
>
>> >> an ameoba may be no l
On Saturday, May 30, 2015, Samiya Illias wrote:
>
>
> On 29-May-2015, at 5:41 pm, Stathis Papaioannou > wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, May 30, 2015, Samiya Illias > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:33 AM, LizR wrote:
>>
>>> On 29 May 2015 at 16:34, Samiya Illias wrote:
>>>
If we
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:48:47AM -0400, John Clark wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 LizR wrote:
> > > It's possible, if consciousness is something that can be either on or
> > off. It seems that way to me,
> >
>
> Interesting. So you have only 2 states of alertness, zero or 100%; thus you
> must
"No compulsion" when the choice is between Heaven and Hell - and on the
basis of something we can't remember having done...? Let's try that in a
non-religious context. "But, m'lud, I warned the victim that I was going to
murder him if he went through with his planned visit to Midsomer - and then
I
> On 29-May-2015, at 5:41 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Saturday, May 30, 2015, Samiya Illias wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:33 AM, LizR wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 16:34, Samiya Illias wrote:
If we do not make the necessary effort, we will end up in the F
On Saturday, May 30, 2015, Samiya Illias wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:33 AM, LizR > wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2015 at 16:34, Samiya Illias > > wrote:
>>
>>> If we do not make the necessary effort, we will end up in the Fire due
>>> to our own negligence.
>>>
>>
>> That is known as "victim
On 30 May 2015 at 07:01, Samiya Illias wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:33 AM, LizR wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2015 at 16:34, Samiya Illias wrote:
>>
>>> If we do not make the necessary effort, we will end up in the Fire due
>>> to our own negligence.
>>>
>>
>> That is known as "victim blaming
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:33 AM, LizR wrote:
> On 29 May 2015 at 16:34, Samiya Illias wrote:
>
>> If we do not make the necessary effort, we will end up in the Fire due to
>> our own negligence.
>>
>
> That is known as "victim blaming". It's the psychology of a sadist - the
> same as the rapist'
On Thu, May 28, 2015 LizR wrote:
> >> an ameoba may be no less conscious, or more, than a kangaroo rat-all
>> the same.
>>
>
> > It's possible, if consciousness is something that can be either on or
> off. It seems that way to me,
>
Interesting. So you have only 2 states of alertness, zero or
On Fri, May 29, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Wolfram is not an expert in logic.
>>
>>
>>And as has been demonstrated many times neither is Bruno Marchal.
>
>
> > By who?
>
As demonstrated by Bruno Marchal of course.
> >>> A function computable by a physical device?
> >> Obviously, unle
On 28 May 2015, at 20:12, Terren Suydam wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 28 May 2015, at 05:16, Terren Suydam wrote:
Language starts to get in the way here, but what you're suggesting
is akin to someone who is blind-drunk - they will have no memory of
On 29 May 2015 at 16:34, Samiya Illias wrote:
> If we do not make the necessary effort, we will end up in the Fire due to
> our own negligence.
>
That is known as "victim blaming". It's the psychology of a sadist - the
same as the rapist's "she was asking for it".
--
You received this message
On 28 May 2015, at 19:18, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> But citing Bruno Marchal as an authority is valid?? If you say
one thing and Wolfram says another I'll put my money on Wolfram.
> Wolfram is not an expert in logic.
And as has been demonstrated many
13 matches
Mail list logo
