OK, This post is clearer. forget my early reply.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 15:55, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/11 Bruno Marchal
On 10 Oct 2012, at 20:13, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal :
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t
The quote might be wrong, as you answer statements which are not mine.
On 16 Oct 2012, at 15:49, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Alberto G. Corona
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal :
>
> On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
>>
>> The same
2012/10/11 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 10 Oct 2012, at 20:13, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> 2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal :
>>
>>>
>>> On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>>
>>> It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is
2012/10/10 Alberto G. Corona
> 2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal :
> >
> > On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
> >
> >> It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
> >>
> >> The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
> >> zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I ha
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> > if you could tell me how to determine if a computer has intelligence
The same way I determine if one of my fellow human beings is intelligent,
if he beats me at a intellectual task then he's intelligent, in fact he's
more intelligent tha
t; -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-11, 13:30:44
Subject: Re: I believe that comp's requirement is one of "as if" rather
than"is"
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
&
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
>
> > Comp seems to avoid this insurmountable problem by avoiding the issue of
> whether the computer actually had an experience, only that it appeared to
> have an experience. So comp's requirement is "as if" rather than "is".
>
In other word
On 10 Oct 2012, at 20:13, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal :
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is
made of
zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I have
2012/10/10 Bruno Marchal :
>
> On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
>>
>> The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
>> zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I have an harcoded belief in
>> the conventional th
On 09 Oct 2012, at 18:58, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I have an harcoded belief in
the conventional thing. Maybe it is, because otherwise, I wi
It may be a zombie or not. I can´t know.
The same applies to other persons. It may be that the world is made of
zombie-actors that try to cheat me, but I have an harcoded belief in
the conventional thing. Maybe it is, because otherwise, I will act
in strange and self destructive ways. I would ac
On 09 Oct 2012, at 13:29, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
But still after this reasoning, I doubt that the self conscious
philosopher robot have the kind of thing, call it a soul, that I have.
?
You mean it is a zombie?
I can't conceive consciousness without a soul. Even if only the
universal
On 09 Oct 2012, at 11:50, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Alberto G. Corona and Bruno,
Perhaps I can express the problem of solipsism as this.
To have a mind means that one can experience.
Hmm... Not really, with "my terminology". A mind is not enough for an
experience. You need a soul. It is a fi
That is true. To pressupose an experience of self in others is a leap
on faith based on similarity. It is duck philosophy. What seems a
Duck, must be a Duck. Even Hume had to limit its destructive
philosophy to avoid self destructiveness. Because there are core
beliefs that we don´t doubt, or we
14 matches
Mail list logo