On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:38, Louis Garcia wrote:
Is evolution going to still require db3-3.1.17 for storing the address
book?
yes
I would like to see it stored in an xml file.
this would make it unbearably slow, either that or hog memory worse than
a pig that's been starved for a few days.
Hi Lark and evolutioner,
The translation of file/importing... is not exact. Here is a patch for it.
The three dot ... means it will open a dialog, so do not need to
translate out.
Thanks
Regards
York Du
diff
Description: application/java-vm
tor, 2003-01-16 kl. 08:17 skrev Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder:
His mail is normal ASCII, not html, but has a def. after the text:
It comes before the text, sorry.
_
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID:
I normally recieve my email messages in plain text form and have not
had a problem (other than spellchecking never working) with Evolution
1.2.1. However, I recently recieved an HTML mail that is set up as
Content-Type: Multipart/related. It then has an HTML portion, and then
various
Install spamassassin.
Create a filter with:
pipe message to shell command
command is: /usr/bin/spamc -c /tmp/spamc.out
returns greater than '0'
Then setup to move to Spam folder, or whatever.
Dave
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 18:58, Manolo wrote:
How can check mails with spamassassing when
I've determined the problem with evolution failing properly line wrap
received emails.
If the email has a long line with no white space (e.g. a long URL
embedded in the message) and the message has long lines of text within
it then the viewer wraps the lines at the length of the longest word
(the
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:05, Dave Finnegan wrote:
What I'd like to see is the viewer to wrap lines at the width of the
viewer window and simply cut long words at the specified character
count.
While on the subject, some messages don't get wrapped well and quoted
when replying to such a
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 11:13, Rupert Heesom wrote:
Hi:
I have a new DSL ISP which I'm trying to migrate my email to.
My ISP is using Linux/sendmail on it's side.
I'm currently using Evo 1.0.2, so that itself may be a problem.
The email details I'm trying to use within Evo are:
Hello All,
I've written a statistical spam filter for Evolution. It works by
analyzing the e-mail that you consider spam and eventually learning to
automatically filter it into a special folder. Because it doesn't use a
set of rigid rules, it should theoretically adapt dynamically, without
Under Normal header display (the smallest view) the email gets
displayed with all header information shown in full. The CC list, for
example, can be quite large. With other mail tools the CC list gets
displayed with the classic + or - button to shrink or expand the
list.
Any way to do this?
tor, 2003-01-16 kl. 16:00 skrev Tony Earnshaw:
Here's an Apple mailer thing of which the body doesn't show up in Evo.
And this one is how it's supposed to be.
Best,
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw
When all's said and done ...
there's nothing left to say or do.
e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 21:24, Enver ALTIN wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:05, Dave Finnegan wrote:
What I'd like to see is the viewer to wrap lines at the width of the
viewer window and simply cut long words at the specified character
count.
While on the subject, some messages don't get
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:20, Marco Tabini wrote:
Hello All,
I've written a statistical spam filter for Evolution. It works by
analyzing the e-mail that you consider spam and eventually learning to
automatically filter it into a special folder. Because it doesn't use a
set of rigid rules, it
UPDATE: I found what was causing this to happen. The message was
crafted using a content-type boundry that included a colon. If I hand
edited that colon out of the message, evolution was able to display the
message properly. Oddly enough, this only happens if you view the
message via IMAP (I
probably the imap server was truncating the boundary in the BODY
response then? *shrug*
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:32, Aaron Smith wrote:
UPDATE: I found what was causing this to happen. The message was
crafted using a content-type boundry that included a colon. If I hand
edited that
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:39, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:36:07PM -0500, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but is the gist of this thread that I can add a
Reply to list toolbar button, with a stock icon and accelerator, just by
editing my
What do you use? Bayesian filter?
I use a filtering technique *similar* to a Bayesian filter, but because
the conditions are usually Bayesian I didn't want to call it as such.
Also, from your mail it's not clear: is spam discarded? I'd advice
*strongly* against it - false positives do
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 14:44, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 02:21, Brendan Murphy wrote:
Using Gnome. I've checked for config discrepancies in the .gnome,
.gnome2, and .gtkrc directories (not to mention looking in the evolution
directory) but haven't found anything that strikes
It displays fine for me in both Evolution 1.3.0.99 and 1.2.1.99
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 11:54, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
tor, 2003-01-16 kl. 16:00 skrev Tony Earnshaw:
Here's an Apple mailer thing of which the body doesn't show up in Evo.
And this one is how it's supposed to be.
Best,
I'd be interested if it wasn't binary only. This probably isn't (but could be) an attempt to get users to load their very own trojan. How does someone prove their legitimacy currently? Even a signature can just be bought. I guess you'll get a lot of people saying something similar until you
tor, 2003-01-16 kl. 18:22 skrev Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder:
spamassassin 2.5 will make bogofilter obsolete, I hope.
My mail server, Exim, has been using SA 2.5 (o.k., CSV, regular updates)
for months.I have no complaints.
Best,
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw
When all's said and done ...
[no cc:s please, I read the list]
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 18:44, Marco Tabini wrote:
What do you use? Bayesian filter?
I use a filtering technique *similar* to a Bayesian filter, but because
the conditions are usually Bayesian I didn't want to call it as such.
Ok.
Also, from your mail
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:15, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
Personally, I'd hate it when evo would start breaking up long lines -
when I send mail with a long line, I'd like it to be kept because I made
it long on purpose...
But this is again one of those areas where tastes
Visor Pro
Mandrake 8.2
Evolution 1.2.1
All conduits would synchronize except for the Contacts. Today, I found
the problem. Below is a list of files within home/w/evolution/Contacts/
addressbook.db*
addressbook.db.summary
create-initial*
I have been blessed with a new comp with a high-res screen.
Unfortunately this means the default font sizes are too small on menus
and such.
As I run RH8, I do not have the gnome1.4 control center. Instead I
specify a new default font in .gtkrc.mine (which is sourced from
.gtkrc):
style default
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 19:22, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
My setup:
- mail comes in
- mail goes through bogofilter
- mail goes through spamassassin
a spamassassin rule gives a score if bogofilter said it's spam.
- mail goes through bogofilter in learning mode
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 13:46, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
[no cc:s please, I read the list]
Fair enough. Sorry about that.
Huh!? Ok, forget it.
Thanks for your summary dismissal.
I'm interested in fighting spam. But I'm also somewhat strict in the use
of opensource
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:22, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:20, Marco Tabini wrote:
snip
For those who can easily install software on the computer receiving
their mail: use procmail and spamassassin and bogofilter (both are free
Software).
My setup:
tor, 2003-01-16 kl. 19:11 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
It displays fine for me in both Evolution 1.3.0.99 and 1.2.1.99
Jeff,
My original posting asked if I had the wrong settings or something I'd
forgotten, done wrong.
Other things with Evo 1.2.1 don't work for me as they should, either,
but then
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 22:42, Eric Lambart wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:51, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
That's my understanding, too. Am I the only one who finds that
Evolution has amnesia when it comes to threading preferences (but
remembers sorting, column, and some other preferences)?
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
probably the imap server was truncating the boundary in the BODY
response then? *shrug*
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:32, Aaron Smith wrote:
UPDATE: I found what was causing this to happen. The message was
crafted using a
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:00, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
tor, 2003-01-16 kl. 19:11 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
It displays fine for me in both Evolution 1.3.0.99 and 1.2.1.99
Jeff,
My original posting asked if I had the wrong settings or something I'd
forgotten, done wrong.
there's no settings
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:25, Aaron Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
probably the imap server was truncating the boundary in the BODY
response then? *shrug*
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:32, Aaron Smith wrote:
UPDATE: I found what was causing this
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 17:47, Bill Hartwell wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 08:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I go through every so often and run RAV on my system
Is this a default package with most installations?
Nope. RAV is available from GeCAD The Software Company, at
My shell command (which seems to work fine) is /usr/bin/spamc -c
Then if it returns = 1. then move to spam folder.
In order for this to work the daemon, spamd must be running. I don't
think the default spamassassin install loads the daemon.
Without the daemon, you can run spamassassin -e
What determines what actual fonts size (in points) is assigned to the Composer values of +0, -1, etc.? There doesn't seem to be a setting in gnomecc.
Lane
Lane P. Lester / Madison County, Georgia
Running Linux more and Windows less
I have a question for the list, and the best way to explain it is to insert some screen shots into the Email. Is this an acceptable thing to do? I know there are some purists out there who frown on Email which contains anything but text.
Steve
--
Steven P. Auerbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SAIC
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 11:05, Dave Finnegan wrote:
I've determined the problem with evolution failing properly line wrap
received emails.
If the email has a long line with no white space (e.g. a long URL
embedded in the message) and the message has long lines of text within
it then the
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:22, Steven P. Auerbach wrote:
I have a question for the list, and the best way to explain it is to
insert some screen shots into the Email. Is this an acceptable thing
to do? I know there are some purists out there who frown on Email
which contains anything but text.
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 19:50, Richard Bellavance wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:15, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
Personally, I'd hate it when evo would start breaking up long lines -
when I send mail with a long line, I'd like it to be kept because I made
it long on
Or you could just put it up on a web page and email out the URL... ;)
-I
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:01, Mark Gordon wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:22, Steven P. Auerbach wrote:
I have a question for the list, and the best way to explain it is to
insert some screen shots into the
I'm not sure where this Normal vs preformat option is that you refer
to, but that isn't the solution I seek.
When I receive email messages that contain:
long lines; admitadly due to a poorly configured server
And
any, one or more, long lines with no white space (e.g. long URL)
Then
The
This example message is NOT examplary of the problem.
The problem is that every single line is too wide. Not just the one URL
line.
I simply can't create an example from here as the formating is done
correctly on outbound messages by evolution. Other, bad, servers,
create long lines.
Again,
-Forwarded Message-
From: Dave Finnegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Long Lines Test
Date: 16 Jan 2003 18:21:36 -0500
Ensure that your mail view window is more narrow than the last line in this buffer and
you *should* see that all of the lines in this message are as
Finally. When I view the message that I am replying to it has the line
wrapping for ALL lines occuring at the full width of the final line (the
one without whitespace in it) regardless of the width of the view
window.
Now, is there some way of getting the main body of the email to wrap at
the
cheers();
Ensure that your mail view window is more narrow than the last line in this buffer
and you *should* see that all of the lines in this message are as long as the last
line and need to be scrolled from left to right.
Wouldn't it be nice if the evolution would line wrap these
cheers();
I just filed 2 new bugs in bugzilla. If someone had same experiences,
please add additional info.
bug #36862 : create new account / authentication
bug #36863 : resend mail / preformat
...guenther
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
cheers();
Finally. When I view the message that I am replying to it has the line
wrapping for ALL lines occuring at the full width of the final line (the
one without whitespace in it) regardless of the width of the view
window.
Nope, thats apparently not true. Try window width greater than
I've had moderate success installing a spam filter server side (I'm
working with Bogofilter at the moment) but am interested in how people
are making use of the Spam scores to then get Evolution to deal with it
appropriately.
I think I'm doing something backwards with my filters, perhaps someone
4) PNG is the format of choice for screenshots, IMHO.
However, you should be aware that not everyone (like me!) will get your
.png's since we are not using Evo at work.
R
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:44, Marco Tabini wrote:
And exactly what happens if *you* happen to disagree with spamassassin?
You make fine adjustments using either the global configuration file or
the individual user_prefs file. In addition to adjusting the weighting
of the scoring, it also
cheers();
bug #36863 : resend mail / preformat
RESOLVED NOTABUG
--- snip ---
this isn't a bug, since your mesage was saved as text/plain it doesn't
hold any formatting options and so re-editing it will always go back
to Preformat because otherwise the line-wrapping may not stay consistant.
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:10, Ian Watkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:22, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:20, Marco Tabini wrote:
snip
For those who can easily install software on the computer receiving
their mail: use procmail and spamassassin and
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 14:07, Marco Tabini wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 13:46, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
[no cc:s please, I read the list]
Fair enough. Sorry about that.
I am really happy that I learned how to create a Reply to List toolbar
button by following this list.
Unfortunately this isn't possible, and I'm sure it'd be a good idea even
if it were?
I think that it's best that the Sent folder contains the exact
byte-for-byte copy that was sent so that you as the user can confirm
that it sent what you expected it to send - (WYSIWYG?).
the reason that it's
cheers();
Unfortunately this isn't possible, and I'm sure it'd be a good idea even
if it were?
I think that it's best that the Sent folder contains the exact
byte-for-byte copy that was sent so that you as the user can confirm
that it sent what you expected it to send - (WYSIWYG?).
I'm
Ah, well format=flowed is on the TODO list for GtkHTML...
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 21:57, guenther wrote:
cheers();
Unfortunately this isn't possible, and I'm sure it'd be a good idea even
if it were?
I think that it's best that the Sent folder contains the exact
byte-for-byte
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 13:57, guenther wrote:
cheers();
Unfortunately this isn't possible, and I'm sure it'd be a good idea even
if it were?
I think that it's best that the Sent folder contains the exact
byte-for-byte copy that was sent so that you as the user can confirm
that it
cheers();
If you find that you are sending similar mails a lot of the time... then
you can probably use templates... haven't seem them in evolution yet
(probably under some menu option.. i hope) - but have seen such options
in mozilla mail etc... creating mail templates that is.
Thanks,
cheers();
Ah, well format=flowed is on the TODO list for GtkHTML...
Thanks, good news -- good nite... ;)
...guenther
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:46, guenther wrote:
cheers();
If you find that you are sending similar mails a lot of the time... then
you can probably use templates... haven't seem them in evolution yet
(probably under some menu option.. i hope) - but have seen such options
in mozilla mail
cheers();
FYI: Templates
- Create a new Mail, then File / Safe Draft
- The drafts (templates) are stored in Local Folders / Drafts
Just tried that... but found that the draft message gets deleted from
drafts once the message is sent... so its not really template
functionality...
Oh,
I conducted a radical restructuring of my filesystem today, which
included tarring up everything in my home directory, moving it all to a
new directory, and untarring it there. My old home directory is now a
symbolic link to my new directory.
Now when I launch Evolution, several of the folders I
Hi!
Damn. That 'single dot on a line' problem again. Anybody else who
couldn't verify my mail, or is it my own mail setup after all?
On my side involved: evo, postfix - then it goes to ximian - then again
postfix, procmail, bogofilter, spamassassin, uw-imapd and evo again. We
established that it
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 00:01, Dave Finnegan wrote:
This example message is NOT examplary of the problem.
The problem is that every single line is too wide. Not just the one URL
line.
I simply can't create an example from here as the formating is done
correctly on outbound messages by
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 20:10, Ian Watkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:22, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:20, Marco Tabini wrote:
snip
For those who can easily install software on the computer receiving
their mail: use procmail and spamassassin and
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 20:07, Marco Tabini wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 13:46, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
[no cc:s please, I read the list]
Fair enough. Sorry about that.
No problem.
Huh!? Ok, forget it.
Thanks for your summary dismissal.
I'm interested in
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 01:13, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 19:22, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
My setup:
- mail comes in
- mail goes through bogofilter
- mail goes through spamassassin
a spamassassin rule gives a score if bogofilter said it's spam.
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 02:13, Andrew Cowie wrote:
I tried quite hard to make something along these lines work, but kept
getting tripped up.
Some questions for you Mika:
1.
I must be missing something really fundamental, but how does one make
filters run WHEN MESSAGES ARRIVE?
You need to
How can empty trash?
___
Yahoo! Móviles
Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito
en http://moviles.yahoo.es
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
70 matches
Mail list logo
